Theorem nss 3999

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nss	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanali 1860	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		df-ss 3919	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 335	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
4	3	bicomi 224	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2111   ⊆ wss 3902

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-ss 3919

This theorem is referenced by:  grur1  10708  psslinpr  10919  reclem2pr  10936  mreexexlem2d  17548  prmcyg  19804  filconn  23796  alexsubALTlem4  23963  wilthlem2  27004  shne0i  31423  onvf1odlem2  35136  erdszelem10  35232  fundmpss  35799  ntrneineine1lem  44116  nssrex  45122  nssd  45141  nsssmfmbf  46816