Theorem nss 3998

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nss	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanali 1892	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		df-ss 3919	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 338	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
4	3	bicomi 227	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3902

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-ss 3919

This theorem is used by:  nssrex  3999  grur1  10833  psslinpr  11044  reclem2pr  11061  mreexexlem2d  17739  prmcyg  20027  filconn  24115  alexsubALTlem4  24282  wilthlem2  27313  shne0i  31937  onvf1odlem2  35709  erdszelem10  35787  fundmpss  36354  ntrneineine1lem  44932  nssd  45945  nsssmfmbf  47615