Theorem nss 3995

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nss	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanali 1892	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		df-ss 3916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 338	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
4	3	bicomi 227	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-ss 3916

This theorem is used by:  nssrex  3996  grur1  10886  psslinpr  11097  reclem2pr  11114  mreexexlem2d  17799  prmcyg  20088  filconn  24182  alexsubALTlem4  24349  wilthlem2  27378  shne0i  32032  onvf1odlem2  35856  erdszelem10  35934  fundmpss  36501  ntrneineine1lem  45043  nssd  46063  nsssmfmbf  47733