![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nss | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nss | ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | exanali 1855 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
2 | dfss2 3967 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | xchbinxr 335 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) |
4 | 3 | bicomi 223 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1532 ∃wex 1774 ∈ wcel 2099 ⊆ wss 3947 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1790 ax-4 1804 ax-5 1906 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2101 ax-9 2109 ax-ext 2699 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-tru 1537 df-ex 1775 df-sb 2061 df-clab 2706 df-cleq 2720 df-clel 2806 df-v 3473 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 |
This theorem is referenced by: grur1 10844 psslinpr 11055 reclem2pr 11072 mreexexlem2d 17625 prmcyg 19849 filconn 23800 alexsubALTlem4 23967 wilthlem2 27014 shne0i 31271 erdszelem10 34810 fundmpss 35362 ntrneineine1lem 43514 nssrex 44452 nssd 44471 nsssmfmbf 46167 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |