Theorem nss 3995

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nss	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanali 1860	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		df-ss 3915	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 335	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
4	3	bicomi 224	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2113   ⊆ wss 3898

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-ss 3915

This theorem is referenced by:  grur1  10718  psslinpr  10929  reclem2pr  10946  mreexexlem2d  17553  prmcyg  19808  filconn  23799  alexsubALTlem4  23966  wilthlem2  27007  shne0i  31430  onvf1odlem2  35169  erdszelem10  35265  fundmpss  35832  ntrneineine1lem  44201  nssrex  45207  nssd  45226  nsssmfmbf  46901