Theorem nss 4002

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nss	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanali 1889	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		df-ss 3923	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 338	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
4	3	bicomi 227	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143   ⊆ wss 3906

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1810  df-ss 3923

This theorem is referenced by:  nssrex  4003  grur1  10806  psslinpr  11017  reclem2pr  11034  mreexexlem2d  17702  prmcyg  19965  filconn  24021  alexsubALTlem4  24188  wilthlem2  27211  shne0i  31778  onvf1odlem2  35566  erdszelem10  35670  fundmpss  36237  ntrneineine1lem  44790  nssd  45803  nsssmfmbf  47473