Theorem nfmod2 2589

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the at-most-one quantifier. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2407. See nfmodv 2590 for a version replacing the distinctor with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2407. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) Avoid df-eu 2600. (Revised by BJ, 14-Oct-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfmod2.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfmod2.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfmod2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜓)

Proof of Theorem nfmod2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfmo 2571	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
2		nfv 1947	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfmod2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfmod2.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
5		nfeqf1 2414	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
6	5	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	4, 6	nfimd 1927	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8	3, 7	nfald2 2480	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
9	2, 8	nfexd 2365	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	1, 9	nfxfrd 1887	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦𝜓)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812  Ⅎwnf 1816  ∃*wmo 2568

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-13 2407

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-mo 2570

This theorem is used by:  nfmod  2592  nfeud2  2621  nfrmod  3415  nfrmo  3417  nfdisj  5094