MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  notsep Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem notsep 5332
Description: In the Separation Scheme sepgi 5258, we require that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑 (which can be generalized to "not be free in"). That requirement is necessary: notsep 5332, which requires only ax-ext 2734 and ax-nul 5267 on top of first-order logic, derives *non*-existence of a "separating set" for specific values of the containing set 𝐴 and of the separating condition 𝜑. Therefore, from the axioms required by notsep 5332 and an overly strong axiom of separation without the requirement that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑, we could derive , a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
notsep.1 𝐴 = {∅}
notsep.2 (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑦)
Assertion
Ref Expression
notsep ¬ ∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem notsep
StepHypRef Expression
1 notsep.1 . . . . . 6 𝐴 = {∅}
2 0ex 5268 . . . . . . 7 ∅ ∈ V
32snnz 4740 . . . . . 6 {∅} ≠ ∅
41, 3eqnetri 3027 . . . . 5 𝐴 ≠ ∅
5 n0 4303 . . . . 5 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴)
64, 5mpbi 233 . . . 4 𝑥 𝑥𝐴
7 pm5.19 391 . . . . 5 ¬ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑦)
8 ibar 538 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
9 notsep.2 . . . . . . 7 (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑦)
108, 9bitr3di 289 . . . . . 6 (𝑥𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑦))
1110bibi2d 345 . . . . 5 (𝑥𝐴 → ((𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑦)))
127, 11mtbiri 330 . . . 4 (𝑥𝐴 → ¬ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
136, 12eximii 1870 . . 3 𝑥 ¬ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
14 exnal 1860 . . 3 (∃𝑥 ¬ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
1513, 14mpbi 233 . 2 ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
1615nex 1833 1 ¬ ∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3  wb 209  wa 401  wal 1568   = wceq 1570  wex 1812  wcel 2145  wne 2957  c0 4282  {csn 4587
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734  ax-nul 5267
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-nul 4283  df-sn 4588
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator