Theorem notzfaus 5369

Description: In the Separation Scheme zfauscl 5304, we require that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑 (which can be generalized to "not be free in"). Here we show special cases of 𝐴 and 𝜑 that result in a contradiction if that requirement is not met. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
notzfaus.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {∅}
notzfaus.2	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notzfaus	⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem notzfaus

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		notzfaus.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 = {∅}
2		0ex 5313	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3	2	snnz 4781	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ≠ ∅
4	1, 3	eqnetri 3009	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ ∅
5		n0 4359	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
6	4, 5	mpbi 230	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
7		pm5.19 386	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
8		ibar 528	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
9		notzfaus.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
10	8, 9	bitr3di 286	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
11	10	bibi2d 342	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)))
12	7, 11	mtbiri 327	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
13	6, 12	eximii 1834	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
14		exnal 1824	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
15	13, 14	mpbi 230	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
16	15	nex 1797	1 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2938  ∅c0 4339  {csn 4631

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2706  ax-nul 5312

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2939  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-nul 4340  df-sn 4632

This theorem is referenced by: (None)