Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabnc | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Law of noncontradiction, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabnc | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | inrab 4245 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
2 | pm3.24 402 | . . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) | |
3 | 2 | rgenw 3077 | . . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) |
4 | rabeq0 4323 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | mpbir 230 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ |
6 | 1, 5 | eqtri 2767 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∀wral 3065 {crab 3069 ∩ cin 3890 ∅c0 4261 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2140 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2174 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1786 df-nf 1790 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-ral 3070 df-rab 3074 df-v 3432 df-dif 3894 df-in 3898 df-nul 4262 |
This theorem is referenced by: elneldisj 4327 vtxdgoddnumeven 27901 esumrnmpt2 32015 hasheuni 32032 ddemeas 32183 ballotth 32483 jm2.22 40797 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |