| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabnc | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Law of noncontradiction, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabnc | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | inrab 4266 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | pm3.24 402 | . . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) | |
| 3 | 2 | rgenw 3053 | . . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) |
| 4 | rabeq0 4338 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | mpbir 231 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ |
| 6 | 1, 5 | eqtri 2757 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∀wral 3049 {crab 3397 ∩ cin 3898 ∅c0 4283 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2182 ax-ext 2706 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2809 df-ral 3050 df-rab 3398 df-v 3440 df-dif 3902 df-in 3906 df-nul 4284 |
| This theorem is referenced by: elneldisj 4342 vtxdgoddnumeven 29576 esumrnmpt2 34174 hasheuni 34191 ddemeas 34342 ballotth 34644 jm2.22 43179 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |