![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabnc | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Law of noncontradiction, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabnc | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | inrab 4305 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
2 | pm3.24 403 | . . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) | |
3 | 2 | rgenw 3065 | . . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) |
4 | rabeq0 4383 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | mpbir 230 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} = ∅ |
6 | 1, 5 | eqtri 2760 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅ |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1541 ∀wral 3061 {crab 3432 ∩ cin 3946 ∅c0 4321 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2703 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 846 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2724 df-clel 2810 df-ral 3062 df-rab 3433 df-v 3476 df-dif 3950 df-in 3954 df-nul 4322 |
This theorem is referenced by: elneldisj 4387 vtxdgoddnumeven 28799 esumrnmpt2 33054 hasheuni 33071 ddemeas 33222 ballotth 33524 jm2.22 41719 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |