Theorem rabsspr 32529

Description: Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of an unordered pair. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabsspr	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑋   𝑥,𝑌

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabsspr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3444	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		dfpr2 4668	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑋, 𝑌} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)}
3	1, 2	sseq12i 4039	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)})
4		ss2ab 4085	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)))
5		impexp 450	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌))))
6	5	albii 1817	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌))))
7		df-ral 3068	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌))))
8	6, 7	bitr4i 278	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)))
9	3, 4, 8	3bitri 297	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 846  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  ∀wral 3067  {crab 3443   ⊆ wss 3976  {cpr 4650

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ral 3068  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651

This theorem is referenced by:  constrfin  33736