| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 325 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31281) |
(31282-32804) |
(32805-50680) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | lncnbd 32401 | A continuous linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) = BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | lnopcnre 32402 | A linear operator is continuous iff it is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinOp → (𝑇 ∈ ContOp ↔ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnli 32403 | Basic property of a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘((𝐴 ·ℎ 𝐵) +ℎ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · (𝑇‘𝐵)) + (𝑇‘𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnfi 32404 | A linear Hilbert space functional is a functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | lnfn0i 32405 | The value of a linear Hilbert space functional at zero is zero. Remark in [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇‘0ℎ) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | lnfnaddi 32406 | Additive property of a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) + (𝑇‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnmuli 32407 | Multiplicative property of a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐴 ·ℎ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 · (𝑇‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnaddmuli 32408 | Sum/product property of a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐵 +ℎ (𝐴 ·ℎ 𝐶))) = ((𝑇‘𝐵) + (𝐴 · (𝑇‘𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnsubi 32409 | Subtraction property for a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) − (𝑇‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfn0 32410 | The value of a linear Hilbert space functional at zero is zero. Remark in [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → (𝑇‘0ℎ) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnmul 32411 | Multiplicative property of a linear Hilbert space functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐴 ·ℎ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 · (𝑇‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | nmbdfnlbi 32412 | A lower bound for the norm of a bounded linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmbdfnlb 32413 | A lower bound for the norm of a bounded linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnexi 32414 | The norm of a continuous linear Hilbert space functional exists. Theorem 3.5(i) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnlbi 32415 | A lower bound for the norm of a continuous linear functional. Theorem 3.5(ii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnex 32416 | The norm of a continuous linear Hilbert space functional exists. Theorem 3.5(i) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn) → (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnlb 32417 | A lower bound of the norm of a continuous linear Hilbert space functional. Theorem 3.5(ii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnconi 32418* | A condition equivalent to "𝑇 is continuous" when 𝑇 is linear. Theorem 3.5(iii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ (abs‘(𝑇‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfncon 32419* | A condition equivalent to "𝑇 is continuous" when 𝑇 is linear. Theorem 3.5(iii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ (abs‘(𝑇‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfncnbd 32420 | A linear functional is continuous iff it is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | imaelshi 32421 | The image of a subspace under a linear operator is a subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝐴) ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | rnelshi 32422 | The range of a linear operator is a subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | nlelshi 32423 | The null space of a linear functional is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | nlelchi 32424 | The null space of a continuous linear functional is a closed subspace. Remark 3.8 of [Beran] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | riesz3i 32425* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Existence part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) | ||
| Theorem | riesz4i 32426* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) | ||
| Theorem | riesz4 32427* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. See riesz2 32429 for the bounded linear functional version. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) | ||
| Theorem | riesz1 32428* | Part 1 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. A linear functional is bounded iff its value can be expressed as an inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 2, see riesz2 32429. For the continuous linear functional version, see riesz3i 32425 and riesz4 32427. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → ((normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | riesz2 32429* | Part 2 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. The value of a bounded linear functional corresponds to a unique inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 1, see riesz1 32428. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem1 32430* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439 (Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104: every continuous linear operator has an adjoint). The value of the auxiliary functional 𝐺. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺‘𝐴) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·ih 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem2 32431* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. 𝐺 is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ContFn)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem3 32432* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. By riesz4 32427, 𝐵 is the unique vector such that (𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) for all 𝑣. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem4 32433* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. The values of auxiliary function 𝐹 are vectors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem5 32434* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. 𝐹 is an adjoint of 𝑇 (later, we will show it is unique). (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝑇‘𝐶) ·ih 𝐴) = (𝐶 ·ih (𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem6 32435* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. 𝐹 is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ LinOp | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem7 32436* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. Helper lemma to show that 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem8 32437* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ContOp | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem9 32438* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32439. 𝐹 provides an example showing the existence of a continuous linear adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑧) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadji 32439* | Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjeui 32440* | Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp ⇒ ⊢ ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjeu 32441* | Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadj 32442* | Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnssadj 32443 | Every continuous linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) ⊆ dom adjℎ | ||
| Theorem | bdopssadj 32444 | Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ BndLinOp ⊆ dom adjℎ | ||
| Theorem | bdopadj 32445 | Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) | ||
| Theorem | adjbdln 32446 | The adjoint of a bounded linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjbdlnb 32447 | An operator is bounded and linear iff its adjoint is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjbd1o 32448 | The mapping of adjoints of bounded linear operators is one-to-one onto. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (adjℎ ↾ BndLinOp):BndLinOp–1-1-onto→BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | adjlnop 32449 | The adjoint of an operator is linear. Proposition 1 of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ LinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjsslnop 32450 | Every operator with an adjoint is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ dom adjℎ ⊆ LinOp | ||
| Theorem | nmopadjlei 32451 | Property of the norm of an adjoint. Part of proof of Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘((adjℎ‘𝑇)‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmopadjlem 32452 | Lemma for nmopadji 32453. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | nmopadji 32453 | Property of the norm of an adjoint. Theorem 3.11(v) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) = (normop‘𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | adjeq0 32454 | An operator is zero iff its adjoint is zero. Theorem 3.11(i) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 = 0hop ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) = 0hop ) | ||
| Theorem | adjmul 32455 | The adjoint of the scalar product of an operator. Theorem 3.11(ii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·op (adjℎ‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | adjadd 32456 | The adjoint of the sum of two operators. Theorem 3.11(iii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom adjℎ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑆) +op (adjℎ‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | nmoptrii 32457 | Triangle inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) + (normop‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoi 32458 | Upper bound for the norm of the composition of two bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) · (normop‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | bdophsi 32459 | The sum of two bounded linear operators is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 +op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | bdophdi 32460 | The difference between two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 −op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | bdopcoi 32461 | The composition of two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | nmoptri2i 32462 | Triangle-type inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ ((normop‘𝑆) − (normop‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | adjcoi 32463 | The adjoint of a composition of bounded linear operators. Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (adjℎ‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadji 32464 | The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ 𝑇)) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadj2i 32465 | The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇))) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadj0i 32466 | An operator composed with its adjoint is zero iff the operator is zero. Theorem 3.11(vii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇)) = 0hop ↔ 𝑇 = 0hop ) | ||
| Theorem | unierri 32467 | If we approximate a chain of unitary transformations (quantum computer gates) 𝐹, 𝐺 by other unitary transformations 𝑆, 𝑇, the error increases at most additively. Equation 4.73 of [NielsenChuang] p. 195. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ UniOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) −op (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇))) ≤ ((normop‘(𝐹 −op 𝑆)) + (normop‘(𝐺 −op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | branmfn 32468 | The norm of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) = (normℎ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brabn 32469 | The bra of a vector is a bounded functional. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rnbra 32470 | The set of bras equals the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ran bra = (LinFn ∩ ContFn) | ||
| Theorem | bra11 32471 | The bra function maps vectors one-to-one onto the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ bra: ℋ–1-1-onto→(LinFn ∩ ContFn) | ||
| Theorem | bracnln 32472 | A bra is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (bra‘𝐴) ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbraval 32473* | Value of the converse of the bra function. Based on the Riesz Lemma riesz4 32427, this very important theorem not only justifies the Dirac bra-ket notation, but allows to extract a unique vector from any continuous linear functional from which the functional can be recovered; i.e. a single vector can "store" all of the information contained in any entire continuous linear functional (mapping from ℋ to ℂ). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) = (℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbracl 32474 | Closure of the converse of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbrabra 32475 | The converse bra of the bra of a vector is the vector itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (◡bra‘(bra‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bracnvbra 32476 | The bra of the converse bra of a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (bra‘(◡bra‘𝑇)) = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | bracnlnval 32477* | The vector that a continuous linear functional is the bra of. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → 𝑇 = (bra‘(℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbramul 32478 | Multiplication property of the converse bra function. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) → (◡bra‘(𝐴 ·fn 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·ℎ (◡bra‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass1 32479 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴〉〈𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶〉 = ∣ 𝐴〉(〈𝐵 ∣ 𝐶〉), i.e., the juxtaposition of an outer product with a ket equals a bra juxtaposed with an inner product. Since 〈𝐵 ∣ 𝐶〉 is a complex number, it is the first argument in the inner product ·ℎ that it is mapped to, although in Dirac notation it is placed after the ket. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) = (((bra‘𝐵)‘𝐶) ·ℎ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass2 32480 | Dirac bra-ket associative law (〈𝐴 ∣ 𝐵〉)〈𝐶 ∣ = 〈𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵〉〈𝐶 ∣ ), i.e., the juxtaposition of an inner product with a bra equals a ket juxtaposed with an outer product. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶)) = ((bra‘𝐴) ∘ (𝐵 ketbra 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass3 32481 | Dirac bra-ket associative law 〈𝐴 ∣ 𝐵〉〈𝐶 ∣ 𝐷〉 = (〈𝐴 ∣ 𝐵〉〈𝐶 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐷〉. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶))‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass4 32482 | Dirac bra-ket associative law 〈𝐴 ∣ 𝐵〉〈𝐶 ∣ 𝐷〉 = 〈𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵〉〈𝐶 ∣ 𝐷〉). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((bra‘𝐴)‘(((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷) ·ℎ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass5 32483 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴〉〈𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶〉〈𝐷 ∣ ) = (( ∣ 𝐴〉〈𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶〉)〈𝐷 ∣. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) ketbra 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass6 32484 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴〉〈𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶〉〈𝐷 ∣ ) = ∣ 𝐴〉(〈𝐵 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐶〉〈𝐷 ∣ )). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (𝐴 ketbra (◡bra‘((bra‘𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷))))) | ||
| Theorem | leopg 32485* | Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈 −op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | leop 32486* | Ordering relation for operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leop2 32487* | Ordering relation for operators. Definition of operator ordering in [Young] p. 141. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ≤ ((𝑈‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leop3 32488 | Operator ordering in terms of a positive operator. Definition of operator ordering in [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝑈 −op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | leoppos 32489* | Binary relation defining a positive operator. Definition VI.1 of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leoprf2 32490 | The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | leoprf 32491 | The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | leopsq 32492 | The square of a Hermitian operator is positive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | 0leop 32493 | The zero operator is a positive operator. (The literature calls it "positive", even though in some sense it is really "nonnegative".) Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0hop ≤op 0hop | ||
| Theorem | idleop 32494 | The identity operator is a positive operator. Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0hop ≤op Iop | ||
| Theorem | leopadd 32495 | The sum of two positive operators is positive. Exercise 1(i) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑈)) → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 +op 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leopmuli 32496 | The scalar product of a nonnegative real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑇)) → 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | leopmul 32497 | The scalar product of a positive real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | leopmul2i 32498 | Scalar product applied to operator ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → (𝐴 ·op 𝑇) ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leoptri 32499 | The positive operator ordering relation satisfies trichotomy. Exercise 1(iii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → ((𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≤op 𝑇) ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leoptr 32500 | The positive operator ordering relation is transitive. Exercise 1(iv) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (𝑆 ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → 𝑆 ≤op 𝑈) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |