P. 325 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 32401-32500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cnlnadjlem5 32401*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32406. 𝐹 is an adjoint of 𝑇 (later, we will show it is unique). (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝑇‘𝐶) ·ih 𝐴) = (𝐶 ·ih (𝐹‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem6 32402*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32406. 𝐹 is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ LinOp
Theorem	cnlnadjlem7 32403*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32406. Helper lemma to show that 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem8 32404*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32406. 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ContOp
Theorem	cnlnadjlem9 32405*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32406. 𝐹 provides an example showing the existence of a continuous linear adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑧) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑧))
Theorem	cnlnadji 32406*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeui 32407*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeu 32408*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnadj 32409*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnssadj 32410	Every continuous linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopssadj 32411	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ BndLinOp ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopadj 32412	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ)
Theorem	adjbdln 32413	The adjoint of a bounded linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbdlnb 32414	An operator is bounded and linear iff its adjoint is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbd1o 32415	The mapping of adjoints of bounded linear operators is one-to-one onto. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (adjℎ ↾ BndLinOp):BndLinOp–1-1-onto→BndLinOp
Theorem	adjlnop 32416	The adjoint of an operator is linear. Proposition 1 of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ LinOp)
Theorem	adjsslnop 32417	Every operator with an adjoint is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom adjℎ ⊆ LinOp
Theorem	nmopadjlei 32418	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Part of proof of Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘((adjℎ‘𝑇)‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	nmopadjlem 32419	Lemma for nmopadji 32420. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	nmopadji 32420	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Theorem 3.11(v) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) = (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	adjeq0 32421	An operator is zero iff its adjoint is zero. Theorem 3.11(i) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 = 0hop ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) = 0hop )
Theorem	adjmul 32422	The adjoint of the scalar product of an operator. Theorem 3.11(ii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	adjadd 32423	The adjoint of the sum of two operators. Theorem 3.11(iii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom adjℎ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑆) +op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	nmoptrii 32424	Triangle inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) + (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	nmopcoi 32425	Upper bound for the norm of the composition of two bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) · (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	bdophsi 32426	The sum of two bounded linear operators is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 +op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdophdi 32427	The difference between two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 −op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdopcoi 32428	The composition of two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	nmoptri2i 32429	Triangle-type inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((normop‘𝑆) − (normop‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇))
Theorem	adjcoi 32430	The adjoint of a composition of bounded linear operators. Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (adjℎ‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑆))
Theorem	nmopcoadji 32431	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ 𝑇)) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj2i 32432	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇))) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj0i 32433	An operator composed with its adjoint is zero iff the operator is zero. Theorem 3.11(vii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇)) = 0hop ↔ 𝑇 = 0hop )
20.6.13  Quantum computation error bound theorem
Theorem	unierri 32434	If we approximate a chain of unitary transformations (quantum computer gates) 𝐹, 𝐺 by other unitary transformations 𝑆, 𝑇, the error increases at most additively. Equation 4.73 of [NielsenChuang] p. 195. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ UniOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) −op (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇))) ≤ ((normop‘(𝐹 −op 𝑆)) + (normop‘(𝐺 −op 𝑇)))
20.6.14  Dirac bra-ket notation (cont.)
Theorem	branmfn 32435	The norm of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) = (normℎ‘𝐴))
Theorem	brabn 32436	The bra of a vector is a bounded functional. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rnbra 32437	The set of bras equals the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ran bra = (LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bra11 32438	The bra function maps vectors one-to-one onto the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ bra: ℋ–1-1-onto→(LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bracnln 32439	A bra is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (bra‘𝐴) ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn))
Theorem	cnvbraval 32440*	Value of the converse of the bra function. Based on the Riesz Lemma riesz4 32394, this very important theorem not only justifies the Dirac bra-ket notation, but allows to extract a unique vector from any continuous linear functional from which the functional can be recovered; i.e. a single vector can "store" all of the information contained in any entire continuous linear functional (mapping from ℋ to ℂ). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) = (℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))
Theorem	cnvbracl 32441	Closure of the converse of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	cnvbrabra 32442	The converse bra of the bra of a vector is the vector itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (◡bra‘(bra‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bracnvbra 32443	The bra of the converse bra of a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (bra‘(◡bra‘𝑇)) = 𝑇)
Theorem	bracnlnval 32444*	The vector that a continuous linear functional is the bra of. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → 𝑇 = (bra‘(℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))))
Theorem	cnvbramul 32445	Multiplication property of the converse bra function. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) → (◡bra‘(𝐴 ·fn 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·ℎ (◡bra‘𝑇)))
Theorem	kbass1 32446	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩ = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩), i.e., the juxtaposition of an outer product with a ket equals a bra juxtaposed with an inner product. Since ⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩ is a complex number, it is the first argument in the inner product ·ℎ that it is mapped to, although in Dirac notation it is placed after the ket. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) = (((bra‘𝐵)‘𝐶) ·ℎ 𝐴))
Theorem	kbass2 32447	Dirac bra-ket associative law (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩)⟨𝐶 ∣ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ), i.e., the juxtaposition of an inner product with a bra equals a ket juxtaposed with an outer product. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶)) = ((bra‘𝐴) ∘ (𝐵 ketbra 𝐶)))
Theorem	kbass3 32448	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐷⟩. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶))‘𝐷))
Theorem	kbass4 32449	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((bra‘𝐴)‘(((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷) ·ℎ 𝐵)))
Theorem	kbass5 32450	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = (( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩)⟨𝐷 ∣. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) ketbra 𝐷))
Theorem	kbass6 32451	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ )). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (𝐴 ketbra (◡bra‘((bra‘𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)))))
20.6.15  Positive operators (cont.)
Theorem	leopg 32452*	Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈 −op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Theorem	leop 32453*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop2 32454*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of operator ordering in [Young] p. 141. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ≤ ((𝑈‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop3 32455	Operator ordering in terms of a positive operator. Definition of operator ordering in [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝑈 −op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leoppos 32456*	Binary relation defining a positive operator. Definition VI.1 of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leoprf2 32457	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leoprf 32458	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leopsq 32459	The square of a Hermitian operator is positive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	0leop 32460	The zero operator is a positive operator. (The literature calls it "positive", even though in some sense it is really "nonnegative".) Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op 0hop
Theorem	idleop 32461	The identity operator is a positive operator. Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op Iop
Theorem	leopadd 32462	The sum of two positive operators is positive. Exercise 1(i) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑈)) → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 +op 𝑈))
Theorem	leopmuli 32463	The scalar product of a nonnegative real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑇)) → 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇))
Theorem	leopmul 32464	The scalar product of a positive real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leopmul2i 32465	Scalar product applied to operator ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → (𝐴 ·op 𝑇) ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptri 32466	The positive operator ordering relation satisfies trichotomy. Exercise 1(iii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → ((𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≤op 𝑇) ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptr 32467	The positive operator ordering relation is transitive. Exercise 1(iv) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (𝑆 ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → 𝑆 ≤op 𝑈)
Theorem	leopnmid 32468	A bounded Hermitian operator is less than or equal to its norm times the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → 𝑇 ≤op ((normop‘𝑇) ·op Iop ))
Theorem	nmopleid 32469	A nonzero, bounded Hermitian operator divided by its norm is less than or equal to the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ 0hop ) → ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇) ≤op Iop )
Theorem	opsqrlem1 32470*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0hop ≤op 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑢 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑢 ∧ (𝑢 ∘ 𝑢) = 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑣 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑣 ∧ (𝑣 ∘ 𝑣) = 𝑇))
Theorem	opsqrlem2 32471*	Lemma for opsqri . 𝐹‘𝑁 is the recursive function An (starting at n=1 instead of 0) of Theorem 9.4-2 of [Kreyszig] p. 476. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘1) = 0hop
Theorem	opsqrlem3 32472*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))
Theorem	opsqrlem4 32473*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶HrmOp
Theorem	opsqrlem5 32474*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op ((𝐹‘𝑁) ∘ (𝐹‘𝑁))))))
Theorem	opsqrlem6 32475*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ≤op Iop    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤op Iop )
20.6.16  Projectors as operators
Theorem	pjhmopi 32476	A projector is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp
Theorem	pjlnopi 32477	A projector is a linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ LinOp
Theorem	pjnmopi 32478	The operator norm of a projector on a nonzero closed subspace is one. Part of Theorem 26.1 of [Halmos] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ≠ 0ℋ → (normop‘(projℎ‘𝐻)) = 1)
Theorem	pjbdlni 32479	A projector is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	pjhmop 32480	A projection is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp)
Theorem	hmopidmchi 32481	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	hmopidmpji 32482	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Halmos seems to omit the proof that 𝐻 is a closed subspace, which is not trivial as hmopidmchi 32481 shows.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇)
Theorem	hmopidmch 32483	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	hmopidmpj 32484	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdii 32485	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) +op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjddii 32486	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 −op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) −op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdi2i 32487	Chained distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) +op (𝑅 ∘ 𝑇)) → (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑆) +op (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑇)))
Theorem	pjcoi 32488	Composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjcocli 32489	Closure of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	pjcohcli 32490	Closure of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	pjadjcoi 32491	Adjoint of composition of projections. Special case of Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·ih (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐺))‘𝐵)))
Theorem	pjcofni 32492	Functionality of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) Fn ℋ
Theorem	pjss1coi 32493	Subset relationship for projections. Theorem 4.5(i)<->(iii) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐺)) = (projℎ‘𝐺))
Theorem	pjss2coi 32494	Subset relationship for projections. Theorem 4.5(i)<->(ii) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) = (projℎ‘𝐺))
Theorem	pjssmi 32495	Projection meet property. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66. Also Theorem 4.5(i)->(iv) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐺 → (((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjssge0i 32496	Theorem 4.5(iv)->(v) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴) → 0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴)))
Theorem	pjdifnormi 32497	Theorem 4.5(v)<->(vi) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴) ↔ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ≤ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴))))
Theorem	pjnormssi 32498*	Theorem 4.5(i)<->(vi) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝑥)) ≤ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝑥)))
Theorem	pjorthcoi 32499	Composition of projections of orthogonal subspaces. Part (i)->(iia) of Theorem 27.4 of [Halmos] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐻) → ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) = 0hop )
Theorem	pjscji 32500	The projection of orthogonal subspaces is the sum of the projections. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐻) → (projℎ‘(𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝐻)) = ((projℎ‘𝐺) +op (projℎ‘𝐻)))