Theorem rexxfrd 5374

Description: Transfer existential quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 10-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralxfrd.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
ralxfrd.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)
ralxfrd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexxfrd	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐶   𝜒,𝑥   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)   𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rexxfrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralxfrd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		ralxfrd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)
3		ralxfrd.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	notbid 321	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
5	1, 2, 4	ralxfrd 5373	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜒))
6	5	notbid 321	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜒))
7		dfrex2 3089	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
8		dfrex2 3089	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜒)
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087

This theorem is used by:  swrdrn3  14723  cmpfi  23634  elfm  24174  rlimcnp  27203  rmoxfrd  32969  iunrdx  33038  dvh4dimat  42312  mapdcv  42534  fimgmcyc  43417  elrfirn  43541  fargshiftfo  48343