Theorem rmorabex 5394

Description: Restricted "at most one" existence implies a restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmorabex	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rmorabex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		moabex 5393	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rmo 3350	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 3405	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	eleq1i 2828	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
5	1, 2, 4	3imtr4i 291	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2105  ∃*wmo 2537  {cab 2714  ∃*wrmo 3349  {crab 3404  Vcvv 3441

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5245  ax-pr 5367

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2539  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2887  df-rmo 3350  df-rab 3405  df-v 3443  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4268  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574

This theorem is referenced by:  supexd  9282