Theorem rmorabex 5375

Description: Restricted "at most one" existence implies a restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmorabex	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rmorabex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		moabex 5374	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rmo 3071	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 3073	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	eleq1i 2829	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
5	1, 2, 4	3imtr4i 292	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2106  ∃*wmo 2538  {cab 2715  ∃*wrmo 3067  {crab 3068  Vcvv 3432

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564

This theorem is referenced by:  supexd  9212