Theorem rmorabex 5369

Description: Restricted "at most one" existence implies a restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmorabex	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rmorabex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		moabex 5368	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rmo 3071	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 3072	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	eleq1i 2829	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
5	1, 2, 4	3imtr4i 291	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃*wmo 2538  {cab 2715  ∃*wrmo 3066  {crab 3067  Vcvv 3422

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561

This theorem is referenced by:  supexd  9142