Theorem sbcexf 35395

Description: Move existential quantifier in and out of class substitution, with an explicit non-free variable condition. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 29-May-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sbcexf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcexf	⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbcexf

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	sb8ev 2374	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
3	2	sbcbii 3831	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
4		sbcex2 3836	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥][𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
5		sbcexf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
6		nfs1v 2160	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑
7	5, 6	nfsbcw 3796	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥][𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑
8		nfv 1915	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
9		sbequ12r 2254	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
10	9	sbcbidv 3829	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
11	7, 8, 10	cbvexv1 2362	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥][𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
12	3, 4, 11	3bitri 299	1 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208  ∃wex 1780  [wsb 2069  Ⅎwnfc 2963  [wsbc 3774

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcexfi  35397