| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 373 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30880) |
(30881-32403) |
(32404-49791) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | crrbar 37201 | Syntax for the set of extended real numbers. |
| class ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrbar 37202 | Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11172. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cinfty 37203 | Syntax for ∞. |
| class ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-infty 37204 | Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | ccchat 37205 | Syntax for ℂ̂. |
| class ℂ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-cchat 37206 | Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | crrhat 37207 | Syntax for ℝ̂. |
| class ℝ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrhat 37208 | Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrhatsscchat 37209 | The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂ | ||
We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations. | ||
| Syntax | caddcc 37210 | Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers. |
| class +ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-addc 37211 | Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, 〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))〉, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Syntax | coppcc 37212 | Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). |
| class -ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-oppc 37213* | Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ 〈1/2, 0R〉))))) | ||
In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11173 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11041. | ||
| Syntax | cltxr 37214 | Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. |
| class <ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-lt 37215* | Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑦, 0R〉 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑧, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞}))) | ||
Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 37219. | ||
| Syntax | carg 37216 | Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. |
| class Arg | ||
| Definition | df-bj-arg 37217 | Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 37172), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π)))) | ||
| Syntax | cmulc 37218 | Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers. |
| class ·ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-mulc 37219 |
Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex
projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is
0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves
products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication
is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails
(0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 37221).
Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ)))))) | ||
| Syntax | cinvc 37220 | Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers. |
| class -1ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-invc 37221* | Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 37219, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0))) | ||
| Syntax | ciomnn 37222 | Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). |
| class iω↪ℕ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-iomnn 37223* |
Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪
{ω}) onto
(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 37170 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 37232 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ 〈[〈{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P〉] ~R , 0R〉) ∪ {〈ω, +∞〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-imafv 37224 | If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-funun 37225 | Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn1 37226 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn2 37227 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun1 37228 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun2 37229 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7123. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn1 37230* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn2 37231* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iomnnom 37232 | The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞ | ||
| Syntax | cnnbar 37233 | Syntax for the extended natural numbers. |
| class ℕ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-nnbar 37234 | Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzbar 37235 | Syntax for the extended integers. |
| class ℤ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzbar 37236 | Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzhat 37237 | Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers. |
| class ℤ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzhat 37238 | Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cdivc 37239 | Syntax for the divisibility relation. |
| class ∥ℂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-divc 37240* |
Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16182).
Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∥ℂ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} | ||
See ccmn 19677 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 19677. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 19678 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency. | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgm 37241 | Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgmel 37242 | Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm) | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrp 37243 | Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrpel 37244 | Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmnd 37245 | Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmndel 37246 | Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 19694, which relies on iscmn 19686. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmnd 37247 | Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmndel 37248 | Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 18837. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrp 37249 | Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrpel 37250 | Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 19682. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmn 37251 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmnel 37252 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 19684. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-modssabl 37253 | (The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 20830; see also lmodgrp 20788 and lmodcmn 20831.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmod 37254 | Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmodel 37255 | Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21028. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod) | ||
UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17364 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand). | ||
| Syntax | cfinsum 37256 | Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids". |
| class FinSum | ||
| Definition | df-bj-finsum 37257* | Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-finsumval0 37258* | Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼))))) | ||
A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls. | ||
In this section, we introduce real vector spaces. | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvimacnv0 37259 | Variant of fvimacnv 6991 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. Note that this antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 47105. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isvec 37260 | The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fldssdrng 37261 | Fields are division rings. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Field ⊆ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-flddrng 37262 | Fields are division rings (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrdrg 37263 | The field of real numbers is a division ring. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-isclm 37264 | The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))) | ||
| Syntax | crrvec 37265 | Syntax for the class of real vector spaces. |
| class ℝ-Vec | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rvec 37266 | Definition of the class of real vector spaces. The previous definition, ⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LMod ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}, can be recovered using bj-isrvec 37267. The present one is preferred since it does not use any dummy variable. That ℝ-Vec could be defined with LVec in place of LMod is a consequence of bj-isrvec2 37273. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec = (LMod ∩ (◡Scalar “ {ℝfld})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec 37267 | The predicate "is a real vector space". Using df-sca 17195 instead of scaid 17237 would shorten the proof by two syntactic steps, but it is preferable not to rely on the precise definition df-sca 17195. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecmod 37268 | Real vector spaces are modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssmod 37269 | Real vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecrr 37270 | The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvecd 37271 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecvec 37272 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec2 37273 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssvec 37274 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccmod 37275 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscmod 37276 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscvec 37277 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccvec 37278 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssabl 37279 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecabl 37280 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ Abel) | ||
Some lemmas to ease algebraic manipulations. | ||
| Theorem | bj-subcom 37281 | A consequence of commutativity of multiplication. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) − (𝐵 · 𝐴)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-lineqi 37282 | Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴)) | ||
Lemmas about barycentric coordinates. For the moment, this is limited to the one-dimensional case (complex line), where existence and uniqueness of barycentric coordinates are proved by bj-bary1 37285 (which computes them). It would be nice to prove the two-dimensional case (is it easier to use ad hoc computations, or Cramer formulas?), in order to do some planar geometry. | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem 37283 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37285: expression for a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐴) + (((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem1 37284 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37285: computation of one of the two barycentric coordinates of a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) → 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1 37285 | Barycentric coordinates in one dimension (complex line). In the statement, 𝑋 is the barycenter of the two points 𝐴, 𝐵 with respective normalized coefficients 𝑆, 𝑇. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) ↔ (𝑆 = ((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))))) | ||
| Syntax | cend 37286 | Token for the monoid of endomorphisms. |
| class End | ||
| Definition | df-bj-end 37287* | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ End = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑥)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑥, 𝑥〉(comp‘𝑐)𝑥)〉})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endval 37288 | Value of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endbase 37289 | Base set of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endcomp 37290 | Composition law of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endmnd 37291 | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category is a monoid. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem3 37292 | Lemma for tau-related theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | taupilemrplb 37293* | A set of positive reals has (in the reals) a lower bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ 𝐴)𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | taupilem1 37294 | Lemma for taupi 37296. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem2 37295 | Lemma for taupi 37296. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | taupi 37296 | Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ = (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | dfgcd3 37297* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdifflemf 37298 | Lemma for irrdiff 37299. The forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdiff 37299* | The irrationals are exactly those reals that are a different distance from every rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | iccioo01 37300 | The closed unit interval is equinumerous to the open unit interval. Based on a Mastodon post by Michael Kinyon. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (0[,]1) ≈ (0(,)1) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |