P. 373 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37201-37300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	cccinftyN 37201	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞N.
class ℂ∞N
Definition	df-bj-ccinftyN 37202	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞N = ran +∞eiτ
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaufo 37203	The function +∞eiτ written as a surjection with domain and range. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ +∞eiτ:ℝ–onto→ℂ∞N
Syntax	chalf 37204	Syntax for the temporary one-half.
class 1/2
Definition	df-bj-onehalf 37205	Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is developed, the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7405) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $.
⊢ 1/2 = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37206	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cinftyexpi 37207	Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞ei
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpi 37208	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 37214. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 37200 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ (-π(,]π) ↦ ⟨𝑥, ℂ⟩)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinv 37209	Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinj 37210	Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 37209 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (-π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-inftyexpidisj 37211	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cccinfty 37212	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞.
class ℂ∞
Definition	df-bj-ccinfty 37213	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei
Theorem	bj-ccinftydisj 37214	The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅
Theorem	bj-elccinfty 37215	A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞)
Syntax	cccbar 37216	Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅.
class ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-ccbar 37217	Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞)
Theorem	bj-ccssccbar 37218	Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-ccinftyssccbar 37219	Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅
Syntax	cpinfty 37220	Syntax for "plus infinity".
class +∞
Definition	df-bj-pinfty 37221	Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0)
Theorem	bj-pinftyccb 37222	The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-pinftynrr 37223	The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cminfty 37224	Syntax for "minus infinity".
class -∞
Definition	df-bj-minfty 37225	Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π)
Theorem	bj-minftyccb 37226	The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-minftynrr 37227	The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	bj-pinftynminfty 37228	The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Syntax	crrbar 37229	Syntax for the set of extended real numbers.
class ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-rrbar 37230	Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11299. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	cinfty 37231	Syntax for ∞.
class ∞
Definition	df-bj-infty 37232	Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Syntax	ccchat 37233	Syntax for ℂ̂.
class ℂ̂
Definition	df-bj-cchat 37234	Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	crrhat 37235	Syntax for ℝ̂.
class ℝ̂
Definition	df-bj-rrhat 37236	Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞})
Theorem	bj-rrhatsscchat 37237	The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂
21.19.6.6  Addition and opposite We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations.
Syntax	caddcc 37238	Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers.
class +ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-addc 37239	Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, ⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))⟩, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥))))
Syntax	coppcc 37240	Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere).
class -ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-oppc 37241*	Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ ⟨1/2, 0R⟩)))))
21.19.6.7  Order relation on the extended reals In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11300 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11168.
Syntax	cltxr 37242	Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals.
class <ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-lt 37243*	Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑦, 0R⟩ ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞})))
21.19.6.8  Argument, multiplication and inverse Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 37247.
Syntax	carg 37244	Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number.
class Arg
Definition	df-bj-arg 37245	Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 37200), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π))))
Syntax	cmulc 37246	Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers.
class ·ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-mulc 37247	Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is 0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails (0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 37249). Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ))))))
Syntax	cinvc 37248	Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers.
class -1ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-invc 37249*	Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 37247, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0)))
21.19.6.9  The canonical bijection from the finite ordinals
Syntax	ciomnn 37250	Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
class iω↪ℕ
Definition	df-bj-iomnn 37251*	Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 37198 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 37260 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ⟨[⟨{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) ∪ {⟨ω, +∞⟩})
Theorem	bj-imafv 37252	If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-funun 37253	Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn1 37254	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn2 37255	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	bj-fvsnun1 37256	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷))
Theorem	bj-fvsnun2 37257	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7203. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn1 37258*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn2 37259*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺)
Theorem	bj-iomnnom 37260	The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞
21.19.6.10  Divisibility
Syntax	cnnbar 37261	Syntax for the extended natural numbers.
class ℕ̅
Definition	df-bj-nnbar 37262	Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞})
Syntax	czzbar 37263	Syntax for the extended integers.
class ℤ̅
Definition	df-bj-zzbar 37264	Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	czzhat 37265	Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers.
class ℤ̂
Definition	df-bj-zzhat 37266	Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	cdivc 37267	Syntax for the divisibility relation.
class ∥ℂ
Definition	df-bj-divc 37268*	Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16291). Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∥ℂ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
21.19.7  Monoids See ccmn 19798 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 19798. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 19799 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency.
Theorem	bj-smgrpssmgm 37269	Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm
Theorem	bj-smgrpssmgmel 37270	Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	bj-mndsssmgrp 37271	Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp
Theorem	bj-mndsssmgrpel 37272	Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp)
Theorem	bj-cmnssmnd 37273	Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-cmnssmndel 37274	Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 19815, which relies on iscmn 19807. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-grpssmnd 37275	Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-grpssmndel 37276	Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 18958. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-ablssgrp 37277	Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp
Theorem	bj-ablssgrpel 37278	Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 19803. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	bj-ablsscmn 37279	Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-ablsscmnel 37280	Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 19805. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
Theorem	bj-modssabl 37281	(The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 20907; see also lmodgrp 20865 and lmodcmn 20908.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel
Theorem	bj-vecssmod 37282	Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod
Theorem	bj-vecssmodel 37283	Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21105. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod)
21.19.7.1  Finite sums in monoids UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17487 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand).
Syntax	cfinsum 37284	Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids".
class FinSum
Definition	df-bj-finsum 37285*	Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	bj-finsumval0 37286*	Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼)))))
21.19.8  Affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls.
21.19.8.1  Real vector spaces In this section, we introduce real vector spaces.
Theorem	bj-fvimacnv0 37287	Variant of fvimacnv 7073 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. Note that this antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 47132. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-isvec 37288	The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)))
Theorem	bj-fldssdrng 37289	Fields are division rings. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Field ⊆ DivRing
Theorem	bj-flddrng 37290	Fields are division rings (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing)
Theorem	bj-rrdrg 37291	The field of real numbers is a division ring. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ℝfld ∈ DivRing
Theorem	bj-isclm 37292	The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
Syntax	crrvec 37293	Syntax for the class of real vector spaces.
class ℝ-Vec
Definition	df-bj-rvec 37294	Definition of the class of real vector spaces. The previous definition, ⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LMod ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}, can be recovered using bj-isrvec 37295. The present one is preferred since it does not use any dummy variable. That ℝ-Vec could be defined with LVec in place of LMod is a consequence of bj-isrvec2 37301. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec = (LMod ∩ (◡Scalar “ {ℝfld}))
Theorem	bj-isrvec 37295	The predicate "is a real vector space". Using df-sca 17313 instead of scaid 17359 would shorten the proof by two syntactic steps, but it is preferable not to rely on the precise definition df-sca 17313. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld))
Theorem	bj-rvecmod 37296	Real vector spaces are modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LMod)
Theorem	bj-rvecssmod 37297	Real vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LMod
Theorem	bj-rvecrr 37298	The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld)
Theorem	bj-isrvecd 37299	The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld)))
Theorem	bj-rvecvec 37300	Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec)