| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 373 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30854) |
(30855-32377) |
(32378-49798) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cinftyexpi 37201 | Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞. |
| class +∞ei | ||
| Definition | df-bj-inftyexpi 37202 | Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 37208. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 37194 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ (-π(,]π) ↦ 〈𝑥, ℂ〉) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinv 37203 | Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinj 37204 | Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 37203 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (-π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpidisj 37205 | An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cccinfty 37206 | Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞. |
| class ℂ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccinfty 37207 | Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftydisj 37208 | The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-elccinfty 37209 | A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞) | ||
| Syntax | cccbar 37210 | Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. |
| class ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccbar 37211 | Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccssccbar 37212 | Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftyssccbar 37213 | Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Syntax | cpinfty 37214 | Syntax for "plus infinity". |
| class +∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-pinfty 37215 | Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftyccb 37216 | The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynrr 37217 | The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cminfty 37218 | Syntax for "minus infinity". |
| class -∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-minfty 37219 | Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π) | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftyccb 37220 | The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftynrr 37221 | The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynminfty 37222 | The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ | ||
| Syntax | crrbar 37223 | Syntax for the set of extended real numbers. |
| class ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrbar 37224 | Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11219. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cinfty 37225 | Syntax for ∞. |
| class ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-infty 37226 | Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | ccchat 37227 | Syntax for ℂ̂. |
| class ℂ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-cchat 37228 | Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | crrhat 37229 | Syntax for ℝ̂. |
| class ℝ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrhat 37230 | Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrhatsscchat 37231 | The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂ | ||
We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations. | ||
| Syntax | caddcc 37232 | Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers. |
| class +ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-addc 37233 | Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, 〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))〉, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Syntax | coppcc 37234 | Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). |
| class -ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-oppc 37235* | Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ 〈1/2, 0R〉))))) | ||
In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11220 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11088. | ||
| Syntax | cltxr 37236 | Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. |
| class <ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-lt 37237* | Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑦, 0R〉 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑧, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞}))) | ||
Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 37241. | ||
| Syntax | carg 37238 | Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. |
| class Arg | ||
| Definition | df-bj-arg 37239 | Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 37194), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π)))) | ||
| Syntax | cmulc 37240 | Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers. |
| class ·ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-mulc 37241 |
Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex
projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is
0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves
products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication
is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails
(0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 37243).
Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ)))))) | ||
| Syntax | cinvc 37242 | Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers. |
| class -1ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-invc 37243* | Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 37241, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0))) | ||
| Syntax | ciomnn 37244 | Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). |
| class iω↪ℕ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-iomnn 37245* |
Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪
{ω}) onto
(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 37192 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 37254 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ 〈[〈{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P〉] ~R , 0R〉) ∪ {〈ω, +∞〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-imafv 37246 | If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-funun 37247 | Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn1 37248 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn2 37249 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun1 37250 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun2 37251 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7160. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn1 37252* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn2 37253* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iomnnom 37254 | The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞ | ||
| Syntax | cnnbar 37255 | Syntax for the extended natural numbers. |
| class ℕ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-nnbar 37256 | Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzbar 37257 | Syntax for the extended integers. |
| class ℤ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzbar 37258 | Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzhat 37259 | Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers. |
| class ℤ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzhat 37260 | Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cdivc 37261 | Syntax for the divisibility relation. |
| class ∥ℂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-divc 37262* |
Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16230).
Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∥ℂ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} | ||
See ccmn 19717 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 19717. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 19718 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency. | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgm 37263 | Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgmel 37264 | Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm) | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrp 37265 | Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrpel 37266 | Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmnd 37267 | Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmndel 37268 | Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 19734, which relies on iscmn 19726. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmnd 37269 | Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmndel 37270 | Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 18879. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrp 37271 | Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrpel 37272 | Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 19722. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmn 37273 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmnel 37274 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 19724. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-modssabl 37275 | (The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 20822; see also lmodgrp 20780 and lmodcmn 20823.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmod 37276 | Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmodel 37277 | Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21020. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod) | ||
UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17412 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand). | ||
| Syntax | cfinsum 37278 | Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids". |
| class FinSum | ||
| Definition | df-bj-finsum 37279* | Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-finsumval0 37280* | Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼))))) | ||
A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls. | ||
In this section, we introduce real vector spaces. | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvimacnv0 37281 | Variant of fvimacnv 7028 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. Note that this antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 47125. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isvec 37282 | The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fldssdrng 37283 | Fields are division rings. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Field ⊆ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-flddrng 37284 | Fields are division rings (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrdrg 37285 | The field of real numbers is a division ring. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-isclm 37286 | The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))) | ||
| Syntax | crrvec 37287 | Syntax for the class of real vector spaces. |
| class ℝ-Vec | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rvec 37288 | Definition of the class of real vector spaces. The previous definition, ⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LMod ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}, can be recovered using bj-isrvec 37289. The present one is preferred since it does not use any dummy variable. That ℝ-Vec could be defined with LVec in place of LMod is a consequence of bj-isrvec2 37295. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec = (LMod ∩ (◡Scalar “ {ℝfld})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec 37289 | The predicate "is a real vector space". Using df-sca 17243 instead of scaid 17285 would shorten the proof by two syntactic steps, but it is preferable not to rely on the precise definition df-sca 17243. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecmod 37290 | Real vector spaces are modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssmod 37291 | Real vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecrr 37292 | The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvecd 37293 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecvec 37294 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec2 37295 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssvec 37296 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccmod 37297 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscmod 37298 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscvec 37299 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccvec 37300 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂVec) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |