Theorem sbcop1 5462

Description: The proper substitution of an ordered pair for a setvar variable corresponds to a proper substitution of its first component. (Contributed by AV, 8-Apr-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sbcop.z	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcop1	⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑎,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝜓,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧, 𝑎)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎)

Proof of Theorem sbcop1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbc5 3770	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝜓))
2		opeq1 4843	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
3	2	equcoms 2054	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
4	3	eqeq2d 2774	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
5		sbcop.z	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
6	5	biimprd 251	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
7	4, 6	biimtrdi 256	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
8	7	com23 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜓 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑)))
9	8	imp 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑))
10	9	exlimiv 1964	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑))
11	1, 10	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑))
12	11	alrimiv 1961	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑))
13		opex 5436	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
14	13	sbc6 3773	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → 𝜑))
15	12, 14	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑)
16		sbc5 3770	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
17	5	biimpd 232	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
18	4, 17	biimtrdi 256	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
19	18	com3l 90	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝜓)))
20	19	imp 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝜓))
21	20	alrimiv 1961	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝜓))
22		vex 3458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
23	22	sbc6 3773	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝜓))
24	21, 23	sylibr 237	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓)
25	24	exlimiv 1964	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓)
26	16, 25	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓)
27	15, 26	impbii 212	1 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [⟨𝑎, 𝑦⟩ / 𝑧]𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811  [wsbc 3742  ⟨cop 4838

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839

This theorem is used by:  sbcop  5463