Theorem sbcrexgOLD 39726

Description: Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3804 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcrexgOLD	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbcrexgOLD

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3723	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		dfsbcq2 3723	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	2	rexbidv 3256	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		nfcv 2955	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5		nfs1v 2157	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfrex 3268	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
7		sbequ12 2250	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	7	rexbidv 3256	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	6, 8	sbie 2521	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10	1, 3, 9	vtoclbg 3517	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1538  [wsb 2069   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3107  [wsbc 3720

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-sbc 3721

This theorem is referenced by:  2sbcrexOLD  39727  sbc2rexgOLD  39729