Theorem difrab 3314

Description: Difference of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab	|- ( { x e. A | ph } \ { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph /\ -. ps ) }

Proof of Theorem difrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2397	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ph } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
2		df-rab 2397	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ps } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) }
3	1, 2	difeq12i 3156	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } \ { x e. A | ps } ) = ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } \ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } )
4		df-rab 2397	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ( ph /\ -. ps ) } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) }
5		difab 3309	. . . 4 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } \ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } ) = { x | ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) }
6		anass 396	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ps ) <-> ( x e. A /\ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
7		simpr 109	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( x e. A /\ ps ) -> ps )
8	7	con3i 604	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( -. ps -> -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) )
9	8	anim2i 337	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ps ) -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
10		pm3.2 138	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x e. A -> ( ps -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
11	10	adantr 272	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( ps -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
12	11	con3d 603	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) -> -. ps ) )
13	12	imdistani 439	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ps ) )
14	9, 13	impbii 125	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ps ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
15	6, 14	bitr3i 185	. . . . 5 |- ( ( x e. A /\ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
16	15	abbii 2228	. . . 4 |- { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) } = { x | ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ -. ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) }
17	5, 16	eqtr4i 2136	. . 3 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } \ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } ) = { x | ( x e. A /\ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) }
18	4, 17	eqtr4i 2136	. 2 |- { x e. A | ( ph /\ -. ps ) } = ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } \ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } )
19	3, 18	eqtr4i 2136	1 |- ( { x e. A | ph } \ { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph /\ -. ps ) }

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1312   e. wcel 1461   {cab 2099   {crab 2392   \ cdif 3032

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 586  ax-in2 587  ax-io 681  ax-5 1404  ax-7 1405  ax-gen 1406  ax-ie1 1450  ax-ie2 1451  ax-8 1463  ax-10 1464  ax-11 1465  ax-i12 1466  ax-bndl 1467  ax-4 1468  ax-17 1487  ax-i9 1491  ax-ial 1495  ax-i5r 1496  ax-ext 2095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1315  df-fal 1318  df-nf 1418  df-sb 1717  df-clab 2100  df-cleq 2106  df-clel 2109  df-nfc 2242  df-ral 2393  df-rab 2397  df-v 2657  df-dif 3037

This theorem is referenced by: (None)