Theorem bdreu 13224

Description: Boundedness of existential uniqueness.

Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 need not be bounded even if 𝐴 and 𝜑 are. Indeed, V is bounded by bdcvv 13226, and ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 13193, if ∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 were bounded when 𝜑 is bounded, then ∀𝑥𝜑 would be bounded as well when 𝜑 is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with ∃, ∃!, ∃*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdreu.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdreu	⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bdreu

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdreu.1	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	ax-bdex 13188	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑
3		ax-bdeq 13189	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 = 𝑧
4	1, 3	ax-bdim 13183	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
5	4	ax-bdal 13187	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
6	5	ax-bdex 13188	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
7	2, 6	ax-bdan 13184	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
8		reu3 2878	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
9	7, 8	bd0r 13194	1 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wral 2417  ∃wrex 2418  ∃!wreu 2419  BOUNDED wbd 13181

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-bd0 13182  ax-bdim 13183  ax-bdan 13184  ax-bdal 13187  ax-bdex 13188  ax-bdeq 13189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-reu 2424  df-rmo 2425

This theorem is referenced by:  bdrmo  13225