Theorem dcand 945

Description: A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.) (Revised by BJ, 14-Nov-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dcand.1	⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓)
dcand.2	⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dcand	⊢ (𝜑 → DECID (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem dcand

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dcand.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓)
2		df-dc 847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
3		id 19	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜓)
4	3	intnanrd 944	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
5	4	orim2i 773	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	2, 5	sylbi 121	. . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
7	1, 6	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
8		dcand.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜒)
9		df-dc 847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (DECID 𝜒 ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜒))
10		id 19	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜒)
11	10	intnand 943	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
12	11	orim2i 773	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜒) → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
13	9, 12	sylbi 121	. . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜒 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
14	8, 13	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
15		ordir 829	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
16	7, 14, 15	sylanbrc 421	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
17		df-dc 847	. 2 ⊢ (DECID (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
18	16, 17	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 720  DECID wdc 846

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847

This theorem is used by:  dcan  946  dcfi  7315  fdcf1  7316  nn0n0n1ge2b  9727  infssfzcldc  10671  infssfzledc  10672  hashfibclem  11284  fzowrddc  11421  bitsinv1  12731  gcdsupex  12736  gcdsupcl  12737  gcdaddm  12763  nnwosdc  12818  lcmval  12843  lcmcllem  12847  lcmledvds  12850  prmdc  12910  pclemdc  13069  infpnlem2  13141  ballotfilemdifcfi  13227  ballotfilemiex  13246  nninfdclemcl  13341  wexmiddiffi  17056