| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nelprd | GIF version | ||
| Description: If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nelprd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) |
| nelprd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| nelprd | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nelprd.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | |
| 2 | nelprd.2 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) | |
| 3 | neanior 2463 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | |
| 4 | elpri 3656 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | |
| 5 | 4 | con3i 633 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) |
| 6 | 3, 5 | sylbi 121 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) |
| 7 | 1, 2, 6 | syl2anc 411 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∨ wo 710 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2176 ≠ wne 2376 {cpr 3634 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-io 711 ax-5 1470 ax-7 1471 ax-gen 1472 ax-ie1 1516 ax-ie2 1517 ax-8 1527 ax-10 1528 ax-11 1529 ax-i12 1530 ax-bndl 1532 ax-4 1533 ax-17 1549 ax-i9 1553 ax-ial 1557 ax-i5r 1558 ax-ext 2187 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1484 df-sb 1786 df-clab 2192 df-cleq 2198 df-clel 2201 df-nfc 2337 df-ne 2377 df-v 2774 df-un 3170 df-sn 3639 df-pr 3640 |
| This theorem is referenced by: tpfidisj 7026 sumtp 11725 perfectlem2 15472 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |