Theorem nelprd 3648

Description: If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nelprd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
nelprd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nelprd	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})

Proof of Theorem nelprd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nelprd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
2		nelprd.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
3		neanior 2454	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
4		elpri 3645	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
5	4	con3i 633	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
6	3, 5	sylbi 121	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
7	1, 2, 6	syl2anc 411	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 709   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167   ≠ wne 2367  {cpr 3623

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ne 2368  df-v 2765  df-un 3161  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629

This theorem is referenced by:  tpfidisj  6989  sumtp  11563