| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 37 of 164) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2d 3601 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq12d 3602 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbi 3603 | Equivalence theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 15-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbid 3604 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq1d 3605 | Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by JJ, 25-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜒, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq2i 3606 | Equivalence/equality inference for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq2d 3607 | Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq12i 3608 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq12d 3609 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | nfifd 3610 | Deduction version of nfif 3611. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfif 3611 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifcldadc 3612 | Conditional closure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1dadc 3613 | Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2dadc 3614 | Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeqdadc 3615 | Separation of the values of the conditional operator. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifbothdadc 3616 | A formula 𝜃 containing a decidable conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜂 → DECID 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | ifbothdc 3617 | A wff 𝜃 containing a conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ DECID 𝜑) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | ifiddc 3618 | Identical true and false arguments in the conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | eqifdc 3619 | Expansion of an equality with a conditional operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifcldcd 3620 | Membership (closure) of a conditional operator, deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifnotdc 3621 | Negating the first argument swaps the last two arguments of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if(¬ 𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | 2if2dc 3622 | Resolve two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → DECID 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = if(𝜓, 𝐴, if(𝜃, 𝐵, 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ifandc 3623 | Rewrite a conjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵), 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifordc 3624 | Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ifmdc 3625 | If a conditional class is inhabited, then the condition is decidable. This shows that conditionals are not very useful unless one can prove the condition decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) → DECID 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnetruedc 3626 | Deduce truth from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnefals 3627 | Deduce falsehood from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnebibdc 3628 | The converse of ifbi 3603 holds if the two values are not equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Syntax | cpw 3629 | Extend class notation to include power class. (The tilde in the Metamath token is meant to suggest the calligraphic font of the P.) |
| class 𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwjust 3630* | Soundness justification theorem for df-pw 3631. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-pw 3631* | Define power class. Definition 5.10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17, but we also let it apply to proper classes, i.e. those that are not members of V. When applied to a set, this produces its power set. A power set of S is the set of all subsets of S, including the empty set and S itself. For example, if 𝐴 is { 3 , 5 , 7 }, then 𝒫 𝐴 is { (/) , { 3 } , { 5 } , { 7 } , { 3 , 5 } , { 3 , 7 } , { 5 , 7 } , { 3 , 5 , 7 } }. We will later introduce the Axiom of Power Sets. Still later we will prove that the size of the power set of a finite set is 2 raised to the power of the size of the set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | pweq 3632 | Equality theorem for power class. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pweqi 3633 | Equality inference for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | pweqd 3634 | Equality deduction for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elpw 3635 | Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | velpw 3636* | Setvar variable membership in a power class (common case). See elpw 3635. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elpwg 3637 | Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2000.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwi 3638 | Subset relation implied by membership in a power class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elpwb 3639 | Characterization of the elements of a power class. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwid 3640 | An element of a power class is a subclass. Deduction form of elpwi 3638. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elelpwi 3641 | If 𝐴 belongs to a part of 𝐶 then 𝐴 belongs to 𝐶. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | nfpw 3642 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for power class. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwidg 3643 | Membership of the original in a power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pwid 3644 | A set is a member of its power class. Theorem 87 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwss 3645* | Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | csn 3646 | Extend class notation to include singleton. |
| class {𝐴} | ||
| Syntax | cpr 3647 | Extend class notation to include unordered pair. |
| class {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
| Syntax | ctp 3648 | Extend class notation to include unordered triplet. |
| class {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Syntax | cop 3649 | Extend class notation to include ordered pair. |
| class 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 | ||
| Syntax | cotp 3650 | Extend class notation to include ordered triple. |
| class 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Theorem | snjust 3651* | Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3652. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-sn 3652* | Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3660. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-pr 3653 | Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 3722. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3665. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵}) | ||
| Definition | df-tp 3654 | Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶}) | ||
| Definition | df-op 3655* |
Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition
{{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets.
Since the
behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes,
we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3858 and opprc2 3859). For
Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3835.
Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 3655 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3655 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})} | ||
| Definition | df-ot 3656 | Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 = 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Theorem | sneq 3657 | Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | sneqi 3658 | Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | sneqd 3659 | Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | dfsn2 3660 | Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | elsng 3661 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elsn 3662 | There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | velsn 3663 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elsni 3664 | There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfpr2 3665* | Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)} | ||
| Theorem | elprg 3666 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | elpr 3667 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elpr2 3668 | A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elpri 3669 | If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | nelpri 3670 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | prneli 3671 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using ∉. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ {𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | nelprd 3672 | If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | eldifpr 3673 | Membership in a set with two elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 3774 and eldiftp 3692. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | rexdifpr 3674 | Restricted existential quantification over a set with two elements removed. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵, 𝐶})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | snidg 3675 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | snidb 3676 | A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | snid 3677 | A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | vsnid 3678 | A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | elsn2g 3679 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elsn2 3680 | There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nelsn 3681 | If a class is not equal to the class in a singleton, then it is not in the singleton. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | mosn 3682* | A singleton has at most one element. This works whether 𝐴 is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3764 and snprc 3711. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | ralsnsg 3683* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ralsns 3684* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | rexsns 3685* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralsng 3686* | Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rexsng 3687* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | exsnrex 3688 | There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | ralsn 3689* | Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | rexsn 3690* | Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | eltpg 3691 | Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | eldiftp 3692 | Membership in a set with three elements removed. Similar to eldifsn 3774 and eldifpr 3673. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐸))) | ||
| Theorem | eltpi 3693 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | eltp 3694 | A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | dftp2 3695* | Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)} | ||
| Theorem | nfpr 3696 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | ralprg 3697* | Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | rexprg 3698* | Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | raltpg 3699* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
| Theorem | rextpg 3700* | Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |