| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 37 of 169) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | r19.28mv 3601* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.45mv 3602* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.44mv 3603* | Restricted version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27m 3604* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | r19.27mv 3605* | Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | rzal 3606* | Vacuous quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexn0 3607* | Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is nonempty (it is also inhabited as shown in rexm 3608). (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rexm 3608* | Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ralidm 3609* | Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ral0 3610 | Vacuous universal quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | ralf0 3611* | The quantification of a falsehood is vacuous when true. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ralm 3612 | Inhabited classes and restricted quantification. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | raaanlem 3613* | Special case of raaan 3614 where 𝐴 is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | raaan 3614* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | raaanv 3615* | Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbss 3616* | Set substitution into the first argument of a subset relation. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 7-Jul-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbcssg 3617 | Distribute proper substitution through a subclass relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dcun 3618 | The union of two decidable classes is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Oct-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | cif 3619 | Extend class notation to include the conditional operator. See df-if 3620 for a description. (In older databases this was denoted "ded".) |
| class if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-if 3620* |
Define the conditional operator. Read if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) as "if
𝜑 then 𝐴 else 𝐵".
See iftrue 3626 and iffalse 3629 for its
values. In mathematical literature, this operator is rarely defined
formally but is implicit in informal definitions such as "let
f(x)=0 if
x=0 and 1/x otherwise."
In the absence of excluded middle, this will tend to be useful where 𝜑 is decidable (in the sense of df-dc 843). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))} | ||
| Theorem | dfif6 3621* | An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 3620 as a simple class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | if0ab 3622* | Expression of a conditional class as a class abstraction when the False alternative is the empty class: in that case, the conditional class is the extension, in the True alternative, of the condition. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | if0ss 3623 | A conditional class with the False alternative being sent to the empty class is included in the class corresponding to the True alternative. (Contributed by BJ, 5-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1 3624 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2 3625 | Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iftrue 3626 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iftruei 3627 | Inference associated with iftrue 3626. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iftrued 3628 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iffalse 3629 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | iffalsei 3630 | Inference associated with iffalse 3629. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | iffalsed 3631 | Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifnefalse 3632 | When values are unequal, but an "if" condition checks if they are equal, then the "false" branch results. This is a simple utility to provide a slight shortening and simplification of proofs versus applying iffalse 3629 directly in this case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → if(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | elif 3633 | Membership in a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ifsbdc 3634 | Distribute a function over an if-clause. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → 𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐷, 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | dfif3 3635* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 3620. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ifssun 3636 | A conditional class is included in the union of its two alternatives. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifidss 3637 | A conditional class whose two alternatives are equal is included in that alternative. With excluded middle, we can prove it is equal to it. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ifeq12 3638 | Equality theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1d 3639 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2d 3640 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq12d 3641 | Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbi 3642 | Equivalence theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 15-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbid 3643 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq1d 3644 | Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by JJ, 25-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜒, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq2i 3645 | Equivalence/equality inference for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq2d 3646 | Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq12i 3647 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | ifbieq12d 3648 | Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | nfifd 3649 | Deduction version of nfif 3650. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfif 3650 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ifcldadc 3651 | Conditional closure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq1dadc 3652 | Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeq2dadc 3653 | Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifeqdadc 3654 | Separation of the values of the conditional operator. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifbothdadc 3655 | A formula 𝜃 containing a decidable conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜂 → DECID 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | ifbothdc 3656 | A wff 𝜃 containing a conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ DECID 𝜑) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | ifiddc 3657 | Identical true and false arguments in the conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | eqifdc 3658 | Expansion of an equality with a conditional operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | ifcldcd 3659 | Membership (closure) of a conditional operator, deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ifnotdc 3660 | Negating the first argument swaps the last two arguments of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if(¬ 𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | 2if2dc 3661 | Resolve two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → DECID 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = if(𝜓, 𝐴, if(𝜃, 𝐵, 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ifandc 3662 | Rewrite a conjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵), 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ifordc 3663 | Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ifmdc 3664 | If a conditional class is inhabited, then the condition is decidable. This shows that conditionals are not very useful unless one can prove the condition decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) → DECID 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnetruedc 3665 | Deduce truth from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnefals 3666 | Deduce falsehood from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ifnebibdc 3667 | The converse of ifbi 3642 holds if the two values are not equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Syntax | cpw 3668 | Extend class notation to include power class. (The tilde in the Metamath token is meant to suggest the calligraphic font of the P.) |
| class 𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwjust 3669* | Soundness justification theorem for df-pw 3670. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-pw 3670* | Define power class. Definition 5.10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17, but we also let it apply to proper classes, i.e. those that are not members of V. When applied to a set, this produces its power set. A power set of S is the set of all subsets of S, including the empty set and S itself. For example, if 𝐴 is { 3 , 5 , 7 }, then 𝒫 𝐴 is { (/) , { 3 } , { 5 } , { 7 } , { 3 , 5 } , { 3 , 7 } , { 5 , 7 } , { 3 , 5 , 7 } }. We will later introduce the Axiom of Power Sets. Still later we will prove that the size of the power set of a finite set is 2 raised to the power of the size of the set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | pweq 3671 | Equality theorem for power class. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pweqi 3672 | Equality inference for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | pweqd 3673 | Equality deduction for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 = 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elpw 3674 | Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | velpw 3675* | Setvar variable membership in a power class (common case). See elpw 3674. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elpwg 3676 | Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2000.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwi 3677 | Subset relation implied by membership in a power class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elpwb 3678 | Characterization of the elements of a power class. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elpwid 3679 | An element of a power class is a subclass. Deduction form of elpwi 3677. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elelpwi 3680 | If 𝐴 belongs to a part of 𝐶 then 𝐴 belongs to 𝐶. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sspw 3681 | The powerclass preserves inclusion. See sspwb 4331 for the biconditional version. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1996.) Extract forward implication of sspwb 4331 since it requires fewer axioms. (Revised by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sspwi 3682 | The powerclass preserves inclusion (inference form). (Contributed by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | sspwd 3683 | The powerclass preserves inclusion (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfpw 3684 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for power class. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwidg 3685 | Membership of the original in a power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pwid 3686 | A set is a member of its power class. Theorem 87 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pwss 3687* | Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | csn 3688 | Extend class notation to include singleton. |
| class {𝐴} | ||
| Syntax | cpr 3689 | Extend class notation to include unordered pair. |
| class {𝐴, 𝐵} | ||
| Syntax | ctp 3690 | Extend class notation to include unordered triplet. |
| class {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} | ||
| Syntax | cop 3691 | Extend class notation to include ordered pair. |
| class 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 | ||
| Syntax | cotp 3692 | Extend class notation to include ordered triple. |
| class 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Theorem | snjust 3693* | Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3694. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-sn 3694* | Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3702. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} | ||
| Definition | df-pr 3695 | Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 3766. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3707. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵}) | ||
| Definition | df-tp 3696 | Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶}) | ||
| Definition | df-op 3697* |
Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition
{{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets.
Since the
behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes,
we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3904 and opprc2 3905). For
Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3881.
Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 3697 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3697 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})} | ||
| Definition | df-ot 3698 | Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 = 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Theorem | sneq 3699 | Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | sneqi 3700 | Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |