| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > notnot | GIF version | ||
| Description: Double negation introduction. Theorem *2.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. The converse need not hold. It holds exactly for stable propositions (by definition, see df-stab 838) and in particular for decidable propositions (see notnotrdc 850). See also notnotnot 639. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1992.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Mar-2013.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| notnot | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id 19 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) | |
| 2 | 1 | con2i 632 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-in1 619 ax-in2 620 |
| This theorem is referenced by: notnotd 635 con3d 636 notnotnot 639 notnoti 650 pm3.24 700 biortn 752 dcn 849 con1dc 863 notnotbdc 879 imanst 895 eueq2dc 2979 ddifstab 3339 ifnotdc 3644 ismkvnex 7354 xrlttri3 10032 nltpnft 10049 ngtmnft 10052 bj-nnsn 16380 bj-nndcALT 16405 bdnthALT 16481 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |