Theorem opthpr 3699

Description: A way to represent ordered pairs using unordered pairs with distinct members. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2007.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
preq12b.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
preq12b.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
preq12b.3	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
preq12b.4	⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opthpr	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem opthpr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		preq12b.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		preq12b.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
3		preq12b.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
4		preq12b.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V
5	1, 2, 3, 4	preq12b 3697	. 2 ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
6		idd 21	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
7		df-ne 2309	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐷)
8		pm2.21 606	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))))
9	7, 8	sylbi 120	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → (𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))))
10	9	impd 252	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
11	6, 10	jaod 706	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → (((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
12		orc 701	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
13	11, 12	impbid1 141	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → (((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
14	5, 13	syl5bb 191	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 697   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480   ≠ wne 2308  Vcvv 2686  {cpr 3528

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ne 2309  df-v 2688  df-un 3075  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534

This theorem is referenced by: (None)