Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ralcomf | GIF version |
Description: Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 |
ralcomf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ancomsimp 1416 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
2 | 1 | 2albii 1447 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
3 | alcom 1454 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 183 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
5 | ralcomf.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
6 | 5 | r2alf 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
7 | ralcomf.2 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
8 | 7 | r2alf 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
9 | 4, 6, 8 | 3bitr4i 211 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1329 ∈ wcel 1480 Ⅎwnfc 2266 ∀wral 2414 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-nfc 2268 df-ral 2419 |
This theorem is referenced by: ralcom 2592 ssiinf 3857 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |