Theorem riotabidva 5698

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 2643 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
riotabidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
riotabidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem riotabidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		riotabidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	pm5.32da 445	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
3	2	iotabidv 5065	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4		df-riota 5682	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
5		df-riota 5682	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
6	3, 4, 5	3eqtr4g 2170	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1312   ∈ wcel 1461  ℩cio 5042  ℩crio 5681

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1404  ax-7 1405  ax-gen 1406  ax-ie1 1450  ax-ie2 1451  ax-8 1463  ax-10 1464  ax-11 1465  ax-i12 1466  ax-bndl 1467  ax-4 1468  ax-17 1487  ax-i9 1491  ax-ial 1495  ax-i5r 1496  ax-ext 2095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1315  df-nf 1418  df-sb 1717  df-clab 2100  df-cleq 2106  df-clel 2109  df-nfc 2242  df-rex 2394  df-uni 3701  df-iota 5044  df-riota 5682

This theorem is referenced by:  riotabiia  5699  divfnzn  9309