| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > riotabidva | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 2764 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | riotabidva.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 1 | pm5.32da 452 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 3 | 2 | iotabidv 5273 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | df-riota 5922 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 5 | df-riota 5922 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3eqtr4g 2265 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2178 ℩cio 5249 ℩crio 5921 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-ext 2189 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2194 df-cleq 2200 df-clel 2203 df-nfc 2339 df-rex 2492 df-uni 3865 df-iota 5251 df-riota 5922 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riotabiia 5940 divfnzn 9777 grpinvpropdg 13522 oppr1g 13959 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |