P. 59 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5801-5900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nfiso 5801	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an isomorphism. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Theorem	isof1o 5802	An isomorphism is a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	isorel 5803	An isomorphism connects binary relations via its function values. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 ↔ (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷)))
Theorem	isoresbr 5804*	A consequence of isomorphism on two relations for a function's restriction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)))
Theorem	isoid 5805	Identity law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)
Theorem	isocnv 5806	Converse law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐻 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	isocnv2 5807	Converse law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom ◡𝑅, ◡𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores2 5808	An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores1 5809	An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)), 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores3 5810	Induced isomorphism on a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐻 “ 𝐾)) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐾) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐾, 𝑋))
Theorem	isotr 5811	Composition (transitive) law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑆, 𝑇 (𝐵, 𝐶)) → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐻) Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐶))
Theorem	iso0 5812	The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅)
Theorem	isoini 5813	Isomorphisms preserve initial segments. Proposition 6.31(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}))) = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})))
Theorem	isoini2 5814	Isomorphisms are isomorphisms on their initial segments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋}))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝑋)}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷))
Theorem	isoselem 5815*	Lemma for isose 5816. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
Theorem	isose 5816	An isomorphism preserves set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
Theorem	isopolem 5817	Lemma for isopo 5818. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Po 𝐵 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	isopo 5818	An isomorphism preserves partial ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Po 𝐵))
Theorem	isosolem 5819	Lemma for isoso 5820. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Or 𝐵 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴))
Theorem	isoso 5820	An isomorphism preserves strict ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
Theorem	f1oiso 5821*	Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. Proposition 6.33 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 = (𝐻‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 = (𝐻‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}) → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	f1oiso2 5822*	Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (◡𝐻‘𝑥)𝑅(◡𝐻‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
2.6.9  Cantor's Theorem
Theorem	canth 5823	No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1500 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴
2.6.10  Restricted iota (description binder)
Syntax	crio 5824	Extend class notation with restricted description binder.
class (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Definition	df-riota 5825	Define restricted description binder. In case there is no unique 𝑥 such that (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) holds, it evaluates to the empty set. See also comments for df-iota 5174. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 2-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	riotaeqdv 5826*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	riotabidv 5827*	Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	riotaeqbidv 5828*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	riotaexg 5829*	Restricted iota is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ∈ V)
Theorem	riotav 5830	An iota restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	riotauni 5831	Restricted iota in terms of class union. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	nfriota1 5832*	The abstraction variable in a restricted iota descriptor isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	nfriotadxy 5833*	Deduction version of nfriota 5834. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	nfriota 5834*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted iota descriptor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	cbvriota 5835*	Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvriotav 5836*	Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	csbriotag 5837*	Interchange class substitution and restricted description binder. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	riotacl2 5838	Membership law for "the unique element in 𝐴 such that 𝜑." (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	riotacl 5839*	Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	riotasbc 5840	Substitution law for descriptions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → [(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	riotabidva 5841*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 2725 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	riotabiia 5842	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted iotas (inference form). (rabbiia 2722 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	riota1 5843*	Property of restricted iota. Compare iota1 5188. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	riota1a 5844	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) = 𝑥))
Theorem	riota2df 5845*	A deduction version of riota2f 5846. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	riota2f 5846*	This theorem shows a condition that allows us to represent a descriptor with a class expression 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝐵))
Theorem	riota2 5847*	This theorem shows a condition that allows us to represent a descriptor with a class expression 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = 𝐵))
Theorem	riotaprop 5848*	Properties of a restricted definite description operator. Todo (df-riota 5825 update): can some uses of riota2f 5846 be shortened with this? (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	riota5f 5849*	A method for computing restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵)
Theorem	riota5 5850*	A method for computing restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = 𝐵)
Theorem	riotass2 5851*	Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2011.) (Revised by NM, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	riotass 5852*	Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	moriotass 5853*	Restriction of a unique element to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	snriota 5854	A restricted class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)})
Theorem	eusvobj2 5855*	Specify the same property in two ways when class 𝐵(𝑦) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eusvobj1 5856*	Specify the same object in two ways when class 𝐵(𝑦) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 → (℩𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵) = (℩𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵))
Theorem	f1ofveu 5857*	There is one domain element for each value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)
Theorem	f1ocnvfv3 5858*	Value of the converse of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝐶) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	riotaund 5859*	Restricted iota equals the empty set when not meaningful. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	acexmidlema 5860*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ ({∅} ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	acexmidlemb 5861*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)
Theorem	acexmidlemph 5862*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	acexmidlemab 5863*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (((℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)) = ∅ ∧ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)) = {∅}) → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	acexmidlemcase 5864*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. Here we divide the proof into cases (based on the disjunction implicit in an unordered pair, not the sort of case elimination which relies on excluded middle). The cases are (1) the choice function evaluated at 𝐴 equals {∅}, (2) the choice function evaluated at 𝐵 equals ∅, and (3) the choice function evaluated at 𝐴 equals ∅ and the choice function evaluated at 𝐵 equals {∅}. Because of the way we represent the choice function 𝑦, the choice function evaluated at 𝐴 is (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦(𝐴 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)) and the choice function evaluated at 𝐵 is (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦(𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)). Other than the difference in notation these work just as (𝑦‘𝐴) and (𝑦‘𝐵) would if 𝑦 were a function as defined by df-fun 5214. Although it isn't exactly about the division into cases, it is also convenient for this lemma to also include the step that if the choice function evaluated at 𝐴 equals {∅}, then {∅} ∈ 𝐴 and likewise for 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → ({∅} ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ((℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)) = ∅ ∧ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)) = {∅})))
Theorem	acexmidlem1 5865*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. List the cases identified in acexmidlemcase 5864 and hook them up to the lemmas which handle each case. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	acexmidlem2 5866*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. This builds on acexmidlem1 5865 by noting that every element of 𝐶 is inhabited. (Note that 𝑦 is not quite a function in the df-fun 5214 sense because it uses ordered pairs as described in opthreg 4552 rather than df-op 3600). The set 𝐴 is also found in onsucelsucexmidlem 4525. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	acexmidlemv 5867*	Lemma for acexmid 5868. This is acexmid 5868 with additional disjoint variable conditions, most notably between 𝜑 and 𝑥. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	acexmid 5868*	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. Theorem 1.3 in [Bauer] p. 483. The statement of the axiom of choice given here is ac2 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (version of 3-Aug-2019). In particular, note that the choice function 𝑦 provides a value when 𝑧 is inhabited (as opposed to nonempty as in some statements of the axiom of choice). Essentially the same proof can also be found at "The axiom of choice implies instances of EM", [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic". Often referred to as Diaconescu's theorem, or Diaconescu-Goodman-Myhill theorem, after Radu Diaconescu who discovered it in 1975 in the framework of topos theory and N. D. Goodman and John Myhill in 1978 in the framework of set theory (although it already appeared as an exercise in Errett Bishop's book Foundations of Constructive Analysis from 1967). For this theorem stated using the df-ac 7199 and df-exmid 4192 syntaxes, see exmidac 7202. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
2.6.11  Operations
Syntax	co 5869	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as + ) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by parentheses. Since operation values are the only possible class expressions consisting of three class expressions in a row surrounded by parentheses, the syntax is unambiguous.
class (𝐴𝐹𝐵)
Syntax	coprab 5870	Extend class notation to include class abstraction (class builder) of nested ordered pairs.
class {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Syntax	cmpo 5871	Extend the definition of a class to include maps-to notation for defining an operation via a rule.
class (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Definition	df-ov 5872	Define the value of an operation. Definition of operation value in [Enderton] p. 79. Note that the syntax is simply three class expressions in a row bracketed by parentheses. There are no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. For example, if class 𝐹 is the operation + and arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵 are 3 and 2 , the expression ( 3 + 2 ) can be proved to equal 5 . This definition is well-defined, although not very meaningful, when classes 𝐴 and/or 𝐵 are proper classes (i.e. are not sets); see ovprc1 5905 and ovprc2 5906. On the other hand, we often find uses for this definition when 𝐹 is a proper class. 𝐹 is normally equal to a class of nested ordered pairs of the form defined by df-oprab 5873. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Definition	df-oprab 5873*	Define the class abstraction (class builder) of a collection of nested ordered pairs (for use in defining operations). This is a special case of Definition 4.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 14. Normally 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧 are distinct, although the definition doesn't strictly require it. See df-ov 5872 for the value of an operation. The brace notation is called "class abstraction" by Quine; it is also called a "class builder" in the literature. The value of the most common operation class builder is given by ovmpo 6004. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
Definition	df-mpo 5874*	Define maps-to notation for defining an operation via a rule. Read as "the operation defined by the map from 𝑥, 𝑦 (in 𝐴 × 𝐵) to 𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)". An extension of df-mpt 4063 for two arguments. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	oveq 5875	Equality theorem for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺𝐵))
Theorem	oveq1 5876	Equality theorem for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	oveq2 5877	Equality theorem for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	oveq12 5878	Equality theorem for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	oveq1i 5879	Equality inference for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐶)
Theorem	oveq2i 5880	Equality inference for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	oveq12i 5881	Equality inference for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐷)
Theorem	oveqi 5882	Equality inference for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶𝐴𝐷) = (𝐶𝐵𝐷)
Theorem	oveq123i 5883	Equality inference for operation value. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jul-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐺𝐷)
Theorem	oveq1d 5884	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	oveq2d 5885	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	oveqd 5886	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐴𝐷) = (𝐶𝐵𝐷))
Theorem	oveq12d 5887	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	oveqan12d 5888	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	oveqan12rd 5889	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	oveq123d 5890	Equality deduction for operation value. (Contributed by FL, 22-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺𝐷))
Theorem	fvoveq1d 5891	Equality deduction for nested function and operation value. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐴𝑂𝐶)) = (𝐹‘(𝐵𝑂𝐶)))
Theorem	fvoveq1 5892	Equality theorem for nested function and operation value. Closed form of fvoveq1d 5891. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹‘(𝐴𝑂𝐶)) = (𝐹‘(𝐵𝑂𝐶)))
Theorem	ovanraleqv 5893*	Equality theorem for a conjunction with an operation values within a restricted universal quantification. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜓 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑋) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	imbrov2fvoveq 5894	Equality theorem for nested function and operation value in an implication for a binary relation. Technical theorem to be used to reduce the size of a significant number of proofs. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑋) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝐹‘((𝐺‘𝑌) · 𝑂))𝑅𝐴)))
Theorem	ovrspc2v 5895*	If an operation value is element of a class for all operands of two classes, then the operation value is an element of the class for specific operands of the two classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	oveqrspc2v 5896*	Restricted specialization of operands, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (𝑋𝐺𝑌))
Theorem	oveqdr 5897	Equality of two operations for any two operands. Useful in proofs using *propd theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦))
Theorem	nfovd 5898	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfov 5899. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	nfov 5899	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for operation value. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	oprabidlem 5900*	Slight elaboration of exdistrfor 1800. A lemma for oprabid 5901. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))