P. 59 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5801-5900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ovprc2 5801	The value of an operation when the second argument is a proper class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel dom 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	csbov123g 5802	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵𝐹𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	csbov12g 5803*	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵𝐹𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	csbov1g 5804*	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵𝐹𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	csbov2g 5805*	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵𝐹𝐶) = (𝐵𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	rspceov 5806*	A frequently used special case of rspc2ev 2799 for operation values. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 = (𝐶𝐹𝐷)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑆 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fnotovb 5807	Equivalence of operation value and ordered triple membership, analogous to fnopfvb 5456. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐶𝐹𝐷) = 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝑅⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	opabbrex 5808*	A collection of ordered pairs with an extension of a binary relation is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → (𝑓(𝑉𝑊𝐸)𝑝 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ 𝜃} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑉𝑊𝐸)𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	0neqopab 5809	The empty set is never an element in an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	brabvv 5810*	If two classes are in a relationship given by an ordered-pair class abstraction, the classes are sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝑋{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
Theorem	dfoprab2 5811*	Class abstraction for operations in terms of class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	reloprab 5812*	An operation class abstraction is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.)
⊢ Rel {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfoprab1 5813	The abstraction variables in an operation class abstraction are not free. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfoprab2 5814	The abstraction variables in an operation class abstraction are not free. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfoprab3 5815	The abstraction variables in an operation class abstraction are not free. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfoprab 5816*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	oprabbid 5817*	Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	oprabbidv 5818*	Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	oprabbii 5819*	Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	ssoprab2 5820	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2 4192. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	ssoprab2b 5821	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2b 4193. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	eqoprab2b 5822	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and biconditional. Compare eqopab2b 4196. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	mpoeq123 5823*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 = 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐹)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 𝐹))
Theorem	mpoeq12 5824*	An equality theorem for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸))
Theorem	mpoeq123dva 5825*	An equality deduction for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 𝐹))
Theorem	mpoeq123dv 5826*	An equality deduction for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 𝐹))
Theorem	mpoeq123i 5827	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐸    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 𝐹)
Theorem	mpoeq3dva 5828*	Slightly more general equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	mpoeq3ia 5829	An equality inference for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	mpoeq3dv 5830*	An equality deduction for the maps-to notation restricted to the value of the operation. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	nfmpo1 5831	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	nfmpo2 5832	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	nfmpo 5833*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	mpo0 5834	A mapping operation with empty domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∅
Theorem	oprab4 5835*	Two ways to state the domain of an operation. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	cbvoprab1 5836*	Rule used to change first bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvoprab2 5837*	Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvoprab12 5838*	Rule used to change first two bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvoprab12v 5839*	Rule used to change first two bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvoprab3 5840*	Rule used to change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvoprab3v 5841*	Rule used to change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2004.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvmpox 5842*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. This version of cbvmpo 5843 allows 𝐵 to be a function of 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐸    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸)
Theorem	cbvmpo 5843*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐷    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	cbvmpov 5844*	Rule to change the bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. With a longer proof analogous to cbvmpt 4018, some distinct variable requirements could be eliminated. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → 𝐸 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	dmoprab 5845*	The domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧𝜑}
Theorem	dmoprabss 5846*	The domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	rnoprab 5847*	The range of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2004.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ran {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑}
Theorem	rnoprab2 5848*	The range of a restricted operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ran {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑}
Theorem	reldmoprab 5849*	The domain of an operation class abstraction is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Rel dom {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	oprabss 5850*	Structure of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2006.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ((V × V) × V)
Theorem	eloprabga 5851*	The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4175. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eloprabg 5852*	The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. Compare elopab 4175. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	ssoprab2i 5853*	Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	mpov 5854*	Operation with universal domain in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝐶}
Theorem	mpomptx 5855*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. In this version 𝐵(𝑥) is not assumed to be constant w.r.t 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	mpompt 5856*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	mpodifsnif 5857	A mapping with two arguments with the first argument from a difference set with a singleton and a conditional as result. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2019.)
⊢ (𝑖 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}), 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑖 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐷)) = (𝑖 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}), 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	mposnif 5858	A mapping with two arguments with the first argument from a singleton and a conditional as result. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2019.)
⊢ (𝑖 ∈ {𝑋}, 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑖 = 𝑋, 𝐶, 𝐷)) = (𝑖 ∈ {𝑋}, 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	fconstmpo 5859*	Representation of a constant operation using the mapping operation. (Contributed by SO, 11-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	resoprab 5860*	Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	resoprab2 5861*	Restriction of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑)})
Theorem	resmpo 5862*	Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸) ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸))
Theorem	funoprabg 5863*	"At most one" is a sufficient condition for an operation class abstraction to be a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∃*𝑧𝜑 → Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	funoprab 5864*	"At most one" is a sufficient condition for an operation class abstraction to be a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	fnoprabg 5865*	Functionality and domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∃!𝑧𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	mpofun 5866*	The maps-to notation for an operation is always a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐹
Theorem	fnoprab 5867*	Functionality and domain of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	ffnov 5868*	An operation maps to a class to which all values belong. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	fovcl 5869	Closure law for an operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqfnov 5870*	Equality of two operations is determined by their values. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐷)) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦))))
Theorem	eqfnov2 5871*	Two operators with the same domain are equal iff their values at each point in the domain are equal. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 7-Jun-2010.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐺𝑦)))
Theorem	fnovim 5872*	Representation of a function in terms of its values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥𝐹𝑦)))
Theorem	mpo2eqb 5873*	Bidirectional equality theorem for a mapping abstraction. Equivalent to eqfnov2 5871. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	rnmpo 5874*	The range of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 20-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶}
Theorem	reldmmpo 5875*	The domain of an operation defined by maps-to notation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel dom 𝐹
Theorem	elrnmpog 5876*	Membership in the range of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elrnmpo 5877*	Membership in the range of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 = 𝐶)
Theorem	ralrnmpo 5878*	A restricted quantifier over an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐹𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rexrnmpo 5879*	A restricted quantifier over an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐹𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	ovid 5880*	The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	ovidig 5881*	The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 5882. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)
Theorem	ovidi 5882*	The value of an operation class abstraction (weak version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧))
Theorem	ov 5883*	The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	ovigg 5884*	The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovig 5885. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by FL, 24-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶))
Theorem	ovig 5885*	The value of an operation class abstraction (weak version). (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶))
Theorem	ovmpt4g 5886*	Value of a function given by the maps-to notation. (This is the operation analog of fvmpt2 5497.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝐶)
Theorem	ovmpos 5887*	Value of a function given by the maps-to notation, expressed using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝑅)
Theorem	ov2gf 5888*	The value of an operation class abstraction. A version of ovmpog 5898 using bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐺    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑆    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpodxf 5889*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpodx 5890*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpod 5891*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpox 5892*	The value of an operation class abstraction. Variant of ovmpoga 5893 which does not require 𝐷 and 𝑥 to be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐷 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpoga 5893*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpoa 5894*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpodf 5895*	Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 5899, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑅 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → 𝜓))
Theorem	ovmpodv 5896*	Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 5899, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑅 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → 𝜓))
Theorem	ovmpodv2 5897*	Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 5899, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆))
Theorem	ovmpog 5898*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovmpo 5899*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐺 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑆)
Theorem	ovi3 5900*	The value of an operation class abstraction. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐻)) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐻)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐹⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = 𝑆)