![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > sbn | GIF version |
Description: Negation inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbn | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbnv 1888 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
2 | 1 | sbbii 1765 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧] ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
3 | sbnv 1888 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧] ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 184 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
5 | ax-17 1526 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) | |
6 | 5 | hbn 1654 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝜑) |
7 | 6 | sbco2vh 1945 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑) |
8 | 5 | sbco2vh 1945 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
9 | 8 | notbii 668 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
10 | 4, 7, 9 | 3bitr3i 210 | 1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 105 [wsb 1762 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 614 ax-in2 615 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1356 df-fal 1359 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 |
This theorem is referenced by: sbcng 3004 difab 3405 rabeq0 3453 abeq0 3454 ssfirab 6933 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |