ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difab GIF version

Theorem difab 3269
Description: Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difab ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem difab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-clab 2076 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2 sban 1878 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓))
3 df-clab 2076 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
43bicomi 131 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑})
5 sbn 1875 . . . . 5 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
6 df-clab 2076 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
75, 6xchbinxr 644 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓})
84, 7anbi12i 449 . . 3 (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}))
91, 2, 83bitrri 206 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
109difeqri 3121 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wa 103   = wceq 1290  wcel 1439  [wsb 1693  {cab 2075  cdif 2997
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 580  ax-in2 581  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1293  df-fal 1296  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-v 2622  df-dif 3002
This theorem is referenced by:  notab  3270  difrab  3274  notrab  3277  imadiflem  5106  imadif  5107
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator