Theorem difab 3269

Description: Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem difab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-clab 2076	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2		sban 1878	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2076	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4	3	bicomi 131	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
5		sbn 1875	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
6		df-clab 2076	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
7	5, 6	xchbinxr 644	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
8	4, 7	anbi12i 449	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
9	1, 2, 8	3bitrri 206	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
10	9	difeqri 3121	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1290   ∈ wcel 1439  [wsb 1693  {cab 2075   ∖ cdif 2997

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 580  ax-in2 581  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1293  df-fal 1296  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-v 2622  df-dif 3002

This theorem is referenced by:  notab  3270  difrab  3274  notrab  3277  imadiflem  5106  imadif  5107