Theorem sbim 1972

Description: Implication inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbim	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Proof of Theorem sbim

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbimv 1908	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2	1	sbbii 1779	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
3		sbimv 1908	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
4	2, 3	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
5		ax-17 1540	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓))
6	5	sbco2vh 1964	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓))
7		ax-17 1540	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
8	7	sbco2vh 1964	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
9		ax-17 1540	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)
10	9	sbco2vh 1964	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
11	8, 10	imbi12i 239	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
12	4, 6, 11	3bitr3i 210	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  [wsb 1776

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777

This theorem is referenced by:  sbrim  1975  sblim  1976  sbbi  1978  moimv  2111  nfraldya  2532  sbcimg  3031  zfregfr  4610  tfi  4618  peano2  4631