Theorem sbim 1951

Description: Implication inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbim	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Proof of Theorem sbim

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbimv 1891	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2	1	sbbii 1763	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
3		sbimv 1891	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
4	2, 3	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓))
5		ax-17 1524	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓))
6	5	sbco2vh 1943	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓))
7		ax-17 1524	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
8	7	sbco2vh 1943	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
9		ax-17 1524	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)
10	9	sbco2vh 1943	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
11	8, 10	imbi12i 239	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
12	4, 6, 11	3bitr3i 210	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  [wsb 1760

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1445  ax-7 1446  ax-gen 1447  ax-ie1 1491  ax-ie2 1492  ax-8 1502  ax-10 1503  ax-11 1504  ax-i12 1505  ax-4 1508  ax-17 1524  ax-i9 1528  ax-ial 1532  ax-i5r 1533

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1459  df-sb 1761

This theorem is referenced by:  sbrim  1954  sblim  1955  sbbi  1957  moimv  2090  nfraldya  2510  sbcimg  3002  zfregfr  4567  tfi  4575  peano2  4588