Theorem supeq1 6987

Description: Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supeq1	⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem supeq1

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq 2673	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
2		rexeq 2674	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
3	2	imbi2d 230	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ↔ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
4	3	ralbidv 2477	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
5	1, 4	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
6	5	rabbidv 2728	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
7	6	unieqd 3822	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
8		df-sup 6985	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
9		df-sup 6985	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2235	1 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353  ∀wral 2455  ∃wrex 2456  {crab 2459  ∪ cuni 3811   class class class wbr 4005  supcsup 6983

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-rab 2464  df-uni 3812  df-sup 6985

This theorem is referenced by:  supeq1d  6988  supeq1i  6989  infeq1  7012