P. 70 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6901-7000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	enen1 6901	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶))
Theorem	enen2 6902	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domen1 6903	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	domen2 6904	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼ 𝐵))
2.6.29  Equinumerosity (cont.)
Theorem	xpf1o 6905*	Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑌):𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):(𝐴 × 𝐶)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpen 6906	Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	mapen 6907	Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐷))
Theorem	mapdom1g 6908	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶))
Theorem	mapxpen 6909	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpmapenlem 6910*	Lemma for xpmapen 6911. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶))
Theorem	xpmapen 6911	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶))
Theorem	ssenen 6912*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)})
2.6.30  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 6913	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2 6914	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem3 6915	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. For a version without the redundant hypotheses, see phplem3g 6917. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem4 6916	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	phplem3g 6917	A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 6915 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	nneneq 6918	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	php5 6919	A natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	snnen2og 6920	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a proper class, see snnen2oprc 6921. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o)
Theorem	snnen2oprc 6921	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a set, see snnen2og 6920. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o)
Theorem	1nen2 6922	One and two are not equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ¬ 1o ≈ 2o
Theorem	phplem4dom 6923	Dominance of successors implies dominance of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≼ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	php5dom 6924	A natural number does not dominate its successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	nndomo 6925	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	phpm 6926*	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. By "proper subset" here we mean that there is an element which is in the natural number and not in the subset, or in symbols ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (which is stronger than not being equal in the absence of excluded middle). Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 6913 through phplem4 6916, nneneq 6918, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	phpelm 6927	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to an element of itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	phplem4on 6928	Equinumerosity of successors of an ordinal and a natural number implies equinumerosity of the originals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
2.6.31  Finite sets
Theorem	fict 6929	A finite set is dominated by ω. Also see finct 7182. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≼ ω)
Theorem	fidceq 6930	Equality of members of a finite set is decidable. This may be counterintuitive: cannot any two sets be elements of a finite set? Well, to show, for example, that {𝐵, 𝐶} is finite would require showing it is equinumerous to 1o or to 2o but to show that you'd need to know 𝐵 = 𝐶 or ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → DECID 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	fidifsnen 6931	All decrements of a finite set are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ≈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	fidifsnid 6932	If we remove a single element from a finite set then put it back in, we end up with the original finite set. This strengthens difsnss 3768 from subset to equality when the set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∪ {𝐵}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnfi 6933	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	enfi 6934	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	enfii 6935	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfilem 6936*	Lemma for ssfiexmid 6937. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ Fin    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ssfiexmid 6937*	If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	infiexmid 6938*	If the intersection of any finite set and any other set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Fin → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	domfiexmid 6939*	If any set dominated by a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	dif1en 6940	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1enen 6941	Subtracting one element from each of two equinumerous finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐶}) ≈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐷}))
Theorem	fiunsnnn 6942	Adding one element to a finite set which is equinumerous to a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ≈ suc 𝑁)
Theorem	php5fin 6943	A finite set is not equinumerous to a set which adds one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}))
Theorem	fisbth 6944	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	0fin 6945	The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
Theorem	fin0 6946*	A nonempty finite set has at least one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	fin0or 6947*	A finite set is either empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	diffitest 6948*	If subtracting any set from a finite set gives a finite set, any proposition of the form ¬ 𝜑 is decidable. This is not a proof of full excluded middle, but it is close enough to show we won't be able to prove 𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ Fin ∀𝑏(𝑎 ∖ 𝑏) ∈ Fin    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	findcard 6949*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 6950*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 6951*	Variation of findcard2 6950 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 6952*	Deduction version of findcard2 6950. If you also need 𝑦 ∈ Fin (which doesn't come for free due to ssfiexmid 6937), use findcard2sd 6953 instead. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	findcard2sd 6953*	Deduction form of finite set induction . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	diffisn 6954	Subtracting a singleton from a finite set produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	diffifi 6955	Subtracting one finite set from another produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	infnfi 6956	An infinite set is not finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ominf 6957	The set of natural numbers is not finite. Although we supply this theorem because we can, the more natural way to express "ω is infinite" is ω ≼ ω which is an instance of domrefg 6826. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ¬ ω ∈ Fin
Theorem	isinfinf 6958*	An infinite set contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛))
Theorem	ac6sfi 6959*	Existence of a choice function for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	tridc 6960*	A trichotomous order is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐵𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	fimax2gtrilemstep 6961*	Lemma for fimax2gtri 6962. The induction step. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ¬ 𝑍𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑈 ∪ {𝑉}) ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	fimax2gtri 6962*	A finite set has a maximum under a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	finexdc 6963*	Decidability of existence, over a finite set and defined by a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	dfrex2fin 6964*	Relationship between universal and existential quantifiers over a finite set. Remark in Section 2.2.1 of [Pierik], p. 8. Although Pierik does not mention the decidability condition explicitly, it does say "only finitely many x to check" which means there must be some way of checking each value of x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	infm 6965*	An infinite set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infn0 6966	An infinite set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	inffiexmid 6967*	If any given set is either finite or infinite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Fin ∨ ω ≼ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	en2eqpr 6968	Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ≈ 2o ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	exmidpw 6969	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o having two elements. Remark of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o ≈ 2o)
Theorem	exmidpweq 6970	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o = 2o)
Theorem	pw1fin 6971	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pw1dc0el 6972	Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	exmidpw2en 6973	The power set of a set being equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o is equivalent to excluded middle. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. The forward direction uses excluded middle expressed as EXMID to show this equinumerosity. The reverse direction is the one which establishes that power set being equinumerous to set exponentiation implies excluded middle. This resolves the question of whether we will be able to prove this equinumerosity theorem in the negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥𝒫 𝑥 ≈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝑥))
Theorem	ss1o0el1o 6974	Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4230 using 1o instead of {∅}. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 1o → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 1o))
Theorem	pw1dc1 6975	If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID 𝑥 = 1o)
Theorem	fientri3 6976	Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	nnwetri 6977*	A natural number is well-ordered by E. More specifically, this order both satisfies We and is trichotomous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ( E We 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 E 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 E 𝑥)))
Theorem	onunsnss 6978	Adding a singleton to create an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	unfiexmid 6979*	If the union of any two finite sets is finite, excluded middle follows. Remark 8.1.17 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	unsnfi 6980	Adding a singleton to a finite set yields a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	unsnfidcex 6981	The 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 condition in unsnfi 6980. This is intended to show that unsnfi 6980 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) → DECID ¬ 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	unsnfidcel 6982	The ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 condition in unsnfi 6980. This is intended to show that unsnfi 6980 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) → DECID ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	unfidisj 6983	The union of two disjoint finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	undifdcss 6984*	Union of complementary parts into whole and decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	undifdc 6985*	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3531 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	undiffi 6986	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3531 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	unfiin 6987	The union of two finite sets is finite if their intersection is. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	prfidisj 6988	A pair is finite if it consists of two unequal sets. For the case where 𝐴 = 𝐵, see snfig 6873. For the cases where one or both is a proper class, see prprc1 3730, prprc2 3731, or prprc 3732. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-May-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	prfidceq 6989*	A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	tpfidisj 6990	A triple is finite if it consists of three unequal sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	tpfidceq 6991*	A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fiintim 6992*	If a class is closed under pairwise intersections, then it is closed under nonempty finite intersections. The converse would appear to require an additional condition, such as 𝑥 and 𝑦 not being equal, or 𝐴 having decidable equality. This theorem is applicable to a topology, which (among other axioms) is closed under finite intersections. Some texts use a pairwise intersection and some texts use a finite intersection, but most topology texts assume excluded middle (in which case the two intersection properties would be equivalent). (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ Fin) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	xpfi 6993	The Cartesian product of two finite sets is finite. Lemma 8.1.16 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	3xpfi 6994	The Cartesian product of three finite sets is a finite set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ Fin → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fisseneq 6995	A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	phpeqd 6996	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of phpm 6926 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ssfirab 6997*	A subset of a finite set is finite if it is defined by a decidable property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfidc 6998*	A subset of a finite set is finite if membership in the subset is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	opabfi 6999*	Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	infidc 7000*	The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)