Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6901-7000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | pmfun 6901 |
A partial function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
30-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) → Fun 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | elmapex 6902 |
Eliminate antecedent for mapping theorems: domain can be taken to be a
set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | elmapi 6903 |
A mapping is a function, forward direction only with superfluous
antecedent removed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → 𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elmapfn 6904 |
A mapping is a function with the appropriate domain. (Contributed by AV,
6-Apr-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → 𝐴 Fn 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | elmapfun 6905 |
A mapping is always a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → Fun 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elmapssres 6906 |
A restricted mapping is a mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | fpmg 6907 |
A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
31-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑pm 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | pmss12g 6908 |
Subset relation for the set of partial functions. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ↑pm 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | pmresg 6909 |
Elementhood of a restricted function in the set of partial functions.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐶)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | elmap 6910 |
Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM,
8-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mapval2 6911* |
Alternate expression for the value of set exponentiation. (Contributed
by NM, 3-Nov-2007.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = (𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∩ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓 Fn 𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | elpm 6912 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | elpm2 6913 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | fpm 6914 |
A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑pm 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsspm 6915 |
Set exponentiation is a subset of partial maps. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | pmsspw 6916 |
Partial maps are a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product of
its arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsspw 6917 |
Set exponentiation is a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product
of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | fvmptmap 6918* |
Special case of fvmpt 5753 for operator theorems. (Contributed by NM,
27-Nov-2007.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑅 ↑𝑚 𝐷) ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑅 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | map0e 6919 |
Set exponentiation with an empty exponent (ordinal number 0) is ordinal
number 1. Exercise 4.42(a) of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 ∅) =
1o) |
| |
| Theorem | map0b 6920 |
Set exponentiation with an empty base is the empty set, provided the
exponent is nonempty. Theorem 96 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by
NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∅
↑𝑚 𝐴) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | map0g 6921 |
Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is
not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89.
(Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠
∅))) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnd 6922* |
The value of set exponentiation with a singleton exponent. Theorem 98
of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by
Glauco Siliprandi, 24-Dec-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐵}) = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑓 = {〈𝐵, 𝑦〉}}) |
| |
| Theorem | map0 6923 |
Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is
not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89.
(Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠
∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsn 6924* |
The value of set exponentiation with a singleton exponent. Theorem 98
of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐵}) = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑓 = {〈𝐵, 𝑦〉}} |
| |
| Theorem | mapss 6925 |
Subset inheritance for set exponentiation. Theorem 99 of [Suppes]
p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | fdiagfn 6926* |
Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐼 × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐼)) |
| |
| Theorem | fvdiagfn 6927* |
Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐼 × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐼 × {𝑋})) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnconst 6928 |
Every singleton map is a constant function. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 25-Mar-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) → 𝐹 = (𝑆 × {(𝐹‘𝑋)})) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsncnv 6929* |
Expression for the inverse of the canonical map between a set and its
set of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
21-Mar-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑆 × {𝑦})) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnf1o2 6930* |
Explicit bijection between a set and its singleton functions.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆)–1-1-onto→𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnf1o3 6931* |
Explicit bijection in the reverse of mapsnf1o2 6930. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 24-Mar-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑆 × {𝑦})) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) |
| |
| 2.6.28 Infinite Cartesian products
|
| |
| Syntax | cixp 6932 |
Extend class notation to include infinite Cartesian products.
|
| class X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Definition | df-ixp 6933* |
Definition of infinite Cartesian product of [Enderton] p. 54. Enderton
uses a bold "X" with 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 written underneath or as a
subscript, as
does Stoll p. 47. Some books use a capital pi, but we will reserve that
notation for products of numbers. Usually 𝐵 represents a class
expression containing 𝑥 free and thus can be thought of as
𝐵(𝑥). Normally, 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴,
although this is
not a requirement of the definition. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
| |
| Theorem | dfixp 6934* |
Eliminate the expression {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} in df-ixp 6933, under the
assumption that 𝐴 and 𝑥 are disjoint. This way,
we can say that
𝑥 is bound in X𝑥 ∈
𝐴𝐵 even if it appears free in 𝐴.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|
| ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
| |
| Theorem | ixpsnval 6935* |
The value of an infinite Cartesian product with a singleton.
(Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ {𝑋}𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑋} ∧ (𝑓‘𝑋) ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}) |
| |
| Theorem | elixp2 6936* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. See df-ixp 6933 for
discussion of the notation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | fvixp 6937* |
Projection of a factor of an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpfn 6938* |
A nuple is a function. (Contributed by FL, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elixp 6939* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | elixpconst 6940* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵.
(Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2008.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpconstg 6941* |
Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpconst 6942* |
Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpeq1 6943* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpeq1d 6944* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ss2ixp 6945 |
Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpeq2 6946 |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpeq2dva 6947* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpeq2dv 6948* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | cbvixp 6949* |
Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | cbvixpv 6950* |
Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | nfixpxy 6951* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | nfixp1 6952 |
The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | ixpprc 6953* |
A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any
function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain 𝐴,
which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpf 6954* |
A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of
the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | uniixp 6955* |
The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian
product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ∪ X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpexgg 6956* |
The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. 𝑥 is normally a
free-variable parameter in 𝐵. Remark in Enderton p. 54.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpin 6957* |
The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) = (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∩ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpiinm 6958* |
The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∩
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpintm 6959* |
The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | ixp0x 6960 |
An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by
NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
|
| ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = {∅} |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmap2g 6961* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This
version of ixpssmapg 6962 avoids ax-coll 4224. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmapg 6962* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 0elixp 6963 |
Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product.
(Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ixpm 6964* |
If an infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) is inhabited,
every 𝐵(𝑥) is inhabited. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
22-Jun-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ixp0 6965 |
The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty
member is empty. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ → X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmap 6966* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark
in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by
NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | resixp 6967* |
Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product.
(Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
31-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | mptelixpg 6968* |
Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐽 ∈ 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | elixpsn 6969* |
Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐹 = {〈𝐴, 𝑦〉})) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpsnf1o 6970* |
A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→X𝑦 ∈ {𝐼}𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnf1o 6971* |
A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐼})) |
| |
| 2.6.29 Equinumerosity
|
| |
| Syntax | cen 6972 |
Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation
("approximately equals" symbol)
|
| class ≈ |
| |
| Syntax | cdom 6973 |
Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly
less-than-or-equal)
|
| class ≼ |
| |
| Syntax | cfn 6974 |
Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
|
| class Fin |
| |
| Definition | df-en 6975* |
Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129.
We define ≈ to be a binary relation rather
than a connective, so
its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because
we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the
usual definition as bren 6982. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦} |
| |
| Definition | df-dom 6976* |
Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145.
Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6986 and domen 6987.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦} |
| |
| Definition | df-fin 6977* |
Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition
10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91,
whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to
our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is
meaningful whether or not we
accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 16733. (Contributed by NM,
22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥 ≈ 𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | relen 6978 |
Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≈ |
| |
| Theorem | reldom 6979 |
Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≼ |
| |
| Theorem | encv 6980 |
If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by
AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | breng 6981* |
Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 6982
does not require the
Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a
subproof of bren 6982. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | bren 6982* |
Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdom2g 6983* |
Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 6984 does not require the
Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a
subproof of brdomg 6984. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomg 6984* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomi 6985* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdom 6986* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | domen 6987* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | domeng 6988* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement
expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | ctex 6989 |
A class dominated by ω is a set. See also ctfoex 7408 which says that
a countable class is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
(Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen4g 6990 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are
equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6995 does not require the Axiom of
Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau,
7-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom4g 6991 |
The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain
when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 6996 does not require
the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by
BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen3g 6992 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6995 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen2g 6993 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6995 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom2g 6994 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This
variation of f1domg 6996 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oeng 6995 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1domg 6996 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen 6997 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom 6998 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | isfi 6999* |
Express "𝐴 is finite". Definition 10.29
of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91
(whose "Fin " is a predicate instead
of a class). (Contributed by
NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 ≈ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | enssdom 7000 |
Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼ |