Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6901-7000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmap2g 6901* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This
version of ixpssmapg 6902 avoids ax-coll 4205. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmapg 6902* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 0elixp 6903 |
Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product.
(Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ X𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ixpm 6904* |
If an infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) is inhabited,
every 𝐵(𝑥) is inhabited. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
22-Jun-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ixp0 6905 |
The infinite Cartesian product of a family 𝐵(𝑥) with an empty
member is empty. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ → X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpssmap 6906* |
An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark
in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by
NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | resixp 6907* |
Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product.
(Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
31-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | mptelixpg 6908* |
Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽) ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐽 ∈ 𝐾)) |
| |
| Theorem | elixpsn 6909* |
Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐹 = {〈𝐴, 𝑦〉})) |
| |
| Theorem | ixpsnf1o 6910* |
A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→X𝑦 ∈ {𝐼}𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnf1o 6911* |
A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ({𝐼} × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐼})) |
| |
| 2.6.28 Equinumerosity
|
| |
| Syntax | cen 6912 |
Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation
("approximately equals" symbol)
|
| class ≈ |
| |
| Syntax | cdom 6913 |
Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly
less-than-or-equal)
|
| class ≼ |
| |
| Syntax | cfn 6914 |
Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
|
| class Fin |
| |
| Definition | df-en 6915* |
Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129.
We define ≈ to be a binary relation rather
than a connective, so
its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because
we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the
usual definition as bren 6922. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦} |
| |
| Definition | df-dom 6916* |
Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145.
Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6926 and domen 6927.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦} |
| |
| Definition | df-fin 6917* |
Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition
10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91,
whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to
our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is
meaningful whether or not we
accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 16631. (Contributed by NM,
22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥 ≈ 𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | relen 6918 |
Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≈ |
| |
| Theorem | reldom 6919 |
Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≼ |
| |
| Theorem | encv 6920 |
If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by
AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | breng 6921* |
Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 6922
does not require the
Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a
subproof of bren 6922. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | bren 6922* |
Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdom2g 6923* |
Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 6924 does not require the
Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a
subproof of brdomg 6924. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomg 6924* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomi 6925* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdom 6926* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | domen 6927* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | domeng 6928* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement
expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | ctex 6929 |
A class dominated by ω is a set. See also ctfoex 7322 which says that
a countable class is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
(Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen4g 6930 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are
equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6935 does not require the Axiom of
Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau,
7-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom4g 6931 |
The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain
when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 6936 does not require
the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by
BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen3g 6932 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6935 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen2g 6933 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6935 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom2g 6934 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This
variation of f1domg 6936 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oeng 6935 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1domg 6936 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen 6937 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom 6938 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | isfi 6939* |
Express "𝐴 is finite". Definition 10.29
of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91
(whose "Fin " is a predicate instead
of a class). (Contributed by
NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 ≈ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | enssdom 6940 |
Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼ |
| |
| Theorem | endom 6941 |
Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94.
(Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | enrefg 6942 |
Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | enref 6943 |
Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | eqeng 6944 |
Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | domrefg 6945 |
Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | en2d 6946* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
12-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | en3d 6947* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
12-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | en2i 6948* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | en3i 6949* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dom2lem 6950* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶):𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom2d 6951* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | dom3d 6952* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom2 6953* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be
read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom3 6954* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be
read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | idssen 6955 |
Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ I ⊆ ≈ |
| |
| Theorem | domssr 6956 |
If 𝐶 is a superset of 𝐵 and
𝐵
dominates 𝐴, then 𝐶
also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau,
7-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ssdomg 6957 |
A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed
by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | ener 6958 |
Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM,
19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ Er V |
| |
| Theorem | ensymb 6959 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ensym 6960 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by
NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ensymi 6961 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ensymd 6962 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6960. (Contributed
by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | entr 6963 |
Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | domtr 6964 |
Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | entri 6965 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | entr2i 6966 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | entr3i 6967 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | entr4i 6968 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | endomtr 6969 |
Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM,
7-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | domentr 6970 |
Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM,
7-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaeng 6971 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous
to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaen2g 6972 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous
to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6973 does not need ax-setind 4637.)
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
25-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaen 6973 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is
equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | en0 6974 |
The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 88.
(Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | ensn1 6975 |
A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM,
4-Nov-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴} ≈ 1o |
| |
| Theorem | ensn1g 6976 |
A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM,
23-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | enpr1g 6977 |
{𝐴, 𝐴} has only one element.
(Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴, 𝐴} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | en1 6978* |
A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥}) |
| |
| Theorem | en1bg 6979 |
A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = {∪ 𝐴})) |
| |
| Theorem | reuen1 6980* |
Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
28-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | euen1 6981 |
Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
28-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | euen1b 6982* |
Two ways to express "𝐴 has a unique element".
(Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | en1uniel 6983 |
A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
16-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑆 ≈ 1o → ∪ 𝑆
∈ 𝑆) |
| |
| Theorem | en1m 6984* |
A set with one element is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
3-Jan-2026.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | 2dom 6985* |
A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | fundmen 6986 |
A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | fundmeng 6987 |
A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐹) → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | cnven 6988 |
A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ≈ ◡𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvct 6989 |
If a set is dominated by ω, so is its converse.
(Contributed by
Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → ◡𝐴 ≼ ω) |
| |
| Theorem | fndmeng 6990 |
A function is equinumerate to its domain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
22-Jun-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnen 6991 |
Set exponentiation to a singleton exponent is equinumerous to its base.
Exercise 4.43 of [Mendelson] p. 255.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | map1 6992 |
Set exponentiation: ordinal 1 to any set is equinumerous to ordinal 1.
Exercise 4.42(b) of [Mendelson] p.
255. (Contributed by NM,
17-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o
↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | en2sn 6993 |
Two singletons are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴} ≈ {𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | snfig 6994 |
A singleton is finite. For the proper class case, see snprc 3735.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ Fin) |
| |
| Theorem | fiprc 6995 |
The class of finite sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 3-Oct-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Fin ∉ V |
| |
| Theorem | unen 6996 |
Equinumerosity of union of disjoint sets. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 92.
(Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | en2prd 6997 |
Two proper unordered pairs are equinumerous. (Contributed by
BTernaryTau, 23-Dec-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷}) |
| |
| Theorem | 1dom1el 6998 |
If a set is dominated by one, then any two of its elements are equal.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2025.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | modom 6999 |
Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
28-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≼ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | modom2 7000* |
Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
24-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 1o) |