Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN 40039

Description: Same as 4atex2 40036 except that 𝑆 and 𝑇 are zero. TODO: do we need this one or 4atex2-0aOLDN 40037 or 4atex2-0bOLDN 40038? (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
4that.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
4that.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4that.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4that.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
4atex2-0cOLDN	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑟,𝐴   𝐻,𝑟   ∨ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝐾,𝑟,𝑧   ≤ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝑃,𝑟,𝑧   𝑄,𝑟,𝑧   𝑆,𝑟,𝑧   𝑊,𝑟,𝑧   𝑇,𝑟,𝑧   𝑧,𝐻

Proof of Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp21l 1290	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
2		simp21r 1291	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)
3		simp23 1208	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾))
4	3	oveq1d 7465	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
5		simp32 1210	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾))
6	5	oveq1d 7465	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
7	4, 6	eqtr4d 2783	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
8		breq1 5169	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
9	8	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
10		oveq2 7458	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃))
11		oveq2 7458	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
12	10, 11	eqeq12d 2756	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃)))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))))
14	13	rspcev 3635	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))
15	1, 2, 7, 14	syl12anc 836	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2946  ∃wrex 3076   class class class wbr 5166  ‘cfv 6575  (class class class)co 7450  lecple 17320  joincjn 18383  0.cp0 18495  Atomscatm 39221  HLchlt 39308  LHypclh 39943

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-iota 6527  df-fv 6583  df-ov 7453

This theorem is referenced by: (None)