Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN 40069

Description: Same as 4atex2 40066 except that 𝑆 and 𝑇 are zero. TODO: do we need this one or 4atex2-0aOLDN 40067 or 4atex2-0bOLDN 40068? (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
4that.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
4that.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4that.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4that.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
4atex2-0cOLDN	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑟,𝐴   𝐻,𝑟   ∨ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝐾,𝑟,𝑧   ≤ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝑃,𝑟,𝑧   𝑄,𝑟,𝑧   𝑆,𝑟,𝑧   𝑊,𝑟,𝑧   𝑇,𝑟,𝑧   𝑧,𝐻

Proof of Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp21l 1291	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
2		simp21r 1292	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)
3		simp23 1209	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾))
4	3	oveq1d 7404	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
5		simp32 1211	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾))
6	5	oveq1d 7404	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
7	4, 6	eqtr4d 2768	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
8		breq1 5112	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
9	8	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
10		oveq2 7397	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃))
11		oveq2 7397	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
12	10, 11	eqeq12d 2746	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃)))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))))
14	13	rspcev 3591	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))
15	1, 2, 7, 14	syl12anc 836	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  ∃wrex 3054   class class class wbr 5109  ‘cfv 6513  (class class class)co 7389  lecple 17233  joincjn 18278  0.cp0 18388  Atomscatm 39251  HLchlt 39338  LHypclh 39973

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-ss 3933  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-br 5110  df-iota 6466  df-fv 6521  df-ov 7392

This theorem is referenced by: (None)