Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN 40041

Description: Same as 4atex2 40038 except that 𝑆 and 𝑇 are zero. TODO: do we need this one or 4atex2-0aOLDN 40039 or 4atex2-0bOLDN 40040? (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
4that.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
4that.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4that.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4that.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
4atex2-0cOLDN	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑟,𝐴   𝐻,𝑟   ∨ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝐾,𝑟,𝑧   ≤ ,𝑟,𝑧   𝑃,𝑟,𝑧   𝑄,𝑟,𝑧   𝑆,𝑟,𝑧   𝑊,𝑟,𝑧   𝑇,𝑟,𝑧   𝑧,𝐻

Proof of Theorem 4atex2-0cOLDN

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp21l 1290	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
2		simp21r 1291	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)
3		simp23 1208	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾))
4	3	oveq1d 7428	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
5		simp32 1210	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾))
6	5	oveq1d 7428	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃) = ((0.‘𝐾) ∨ 𝑃))
7	4, 6	eqtr4d 2772	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
8		breq1 5126	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
9	8	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
10		oveq2 7421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃))
11		oveq2 7421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))
12	10, 11	eqeq12d 2750	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃)))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑃 → ((¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))))
14	13	rspcev 3605	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑃))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))
15	1, 2, 7, 14	syl12anc 836	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑆 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑇 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑇 ∨ 𝑧)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107   ≠ wne 2931  ∃wrex 3059   class class class wbr 5123  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7413  lecple 17280  joincjn 18327  0.cp0 18437  Atomscatm 39223  HLchlt 39310  LHypclh 39945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4888  df-br 5124  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6549  df-ov 7416

This theorem is referenced by: (None)