P. 397 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39601-39700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cnvelrels 39601	The converse of a set is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	cosscnvelrels 39602	Cosets of converse sets are elements of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels )
21.28.8  Subset relations
Definition	df-ssr 39603*	Define the subsets class or the class of subset relations. Similar to definitions of epsilon relation (df-eprel 5550) and identity relation (df-id 5545) classes. Subset relation class and Scott Fenton's subset class df-sset 36710 are the same: S = SSet (compare dfssr2 39604 with df-sset 36710), the only reason we do not use dfssr2 39604 as the base definition of the subsets class is the way we defined the epsilon relation and the identity relation classes. The binary relation on the class of subsets and the subclass relationship (df-ss 3896) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set, see brssr 39606. Yet in general we use the subclass relation 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 both for classes and for sets, see the comment of df-ss 3896. The only exception (aside from directly investigating the class S e.g. in relssr 39605 or in extssr 39614) is when we have a specific purpose with its usage, like in case of df-refs 39615 versus df-cnvrefs 39630, where we need S to define the class of reflexive sets in order to be able to define the class of converse reflexive sets with the help of the converse of S. The subsets class S has another place in set.mm as well: if we define extensional relation based on the common property in extid 39341, extep 39314 and extssr 39614, then "extrelssr" " |- ExtRel S " is a theorem along with "extrelep" " |- ExtRel E " and "extrelid" " |- ExtRel I " . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.)
⊢ S = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦}
Theorem	dfssr2 39604	Alternate definition of the subset relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Aug-2021.)
⊢ S = ((V × V) ∖ ran ( E ⋉ (V ∖ E )))
Theorem	relssr 39605	The subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ Rel S
Theorem	brssr 39606	The subset relation and subclass relationship (df-ss 3896) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	brssrid 39607	Any set is a subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 S 𝐴)
Theorem	issetssr 39608	Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 S 𝐴)
Theorem	brssrres 39609	Restricted subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	br1cnvssrres 39610	Restricted converse subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵◡( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	brcnvssr 39611	The converse of a subset relation swaps arguments. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡ S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	brcnvssrid 39612	Any set is a converse subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴◡ S 𝐴)
Theorem	br1cossxrncnvssrres 39613*	⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ and ⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ are cosets by range Cartesian product with restricted converse subsets class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ S ↾ 𝐴))⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷))))
Theorem	extssr 39614	Property of subset relation, see also extid 39341, extep 39314 and the comment of df-ssr 39603. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ S = [𝐵]◡ S ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21.28.9  Reflexivity
Definition	df-refs 39615	Define the class of all reflexive sets. It is used only by df-refrels 39616. We use subset relation S (df-ssr 39603) here to be able to define converse reflexivity (df-cnvrefs 39630), see also the comment of df-ssr 39603. The elements of this class are not necessarily relations (versus df-refrels 39616). Note the similarity of Definitions df-refs 39615, df-syms 39647 and df-trs 39681, cf. comments of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ Refs = {𝑥 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-refrels 39616	Define the class of reflexive relations. This is practically dfrefrels2 39618 (which reveals that RefRels can not include proper classes like I as is elements, see comments of dfrefrels2 39618). Another alternative definition is dfrefrels3 39619. The element of this class and the reflexive relation predicate (df-refrel 39617) are the same, that is, (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝐴 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 39625. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of symmetric (df-symrels 39648) and transitive (df-trrels 39682) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-refrel 39617	Define the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) This is a surprising definition, see the comment of dfrefrel3 39621. Alternate definitions are dfrefrel2 39620 and dfrefrel3 39621. For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive relations (df-refrels 39616) is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive relation predicate, that is (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 39625. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfrefrels2 39618	Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1. Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html). Proper classes (like I, see iprc 7923) are not elements of this (or any) class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class but a set, see elex 3471. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our main definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 39617. See also the comment of df-rels 39465. Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 39618, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 39615, df-syms 39647 and df-trs 39681 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 39618, dfsymrels2 39650 and dftrrels2 39684. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
Theorem	dfrefrels3 39619*	Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑟𝑦)}
Theorem	dfrefrel2 39620	Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfrefrel3 39621*	Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. A relation is reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if an element of its domain is the same as an element of its range, then there is the relation between them. Note that this is definitely not the definition we are accustomed to, like e.g. idref 7149 / idrefALT 6106 or df-reflexive 51032 ⊢ (𝑅 Reflexive 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥)). It turns out that the not-surprising definition which contains ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 needs symmetry as well, see refsymrels3 39675. Only when this symmetry condition holds, like in case of equivalence relations, see dfeqvrels3 39698, can we write the traditional form ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 for reflexive relations. For the special case with square Cartesian product when the two forms are equivalent see idinxpssinxp4 39351 where ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥). See also similar definition of the converse reflexive relations class dfcnvrefrel3 39636. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfrefrel5 39622*	Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑅 ∩ ran 𝑅)𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elrefrels2 39623	Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefrels3 39624*	Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefrelsrel 39625	For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive relations (df-refrels 39616) is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅))
Theorem	refreleq 39626	Equality theorem for reflexive relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ RefRel 𝑆))
Theorem	refrelid 39627	Identity relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ RefRel I
Theorem	refrelcoss 39628	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.)
⊢ RefRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	refrelressn 39629	Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the set ' A ' (see ressn2 39557) is reflexive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → RefRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}))
21.28.10  Converse reflexivity
Definition	df-cnvrefs 39630	Define the class of all converse reflexive sets, see the comment of df-ssr 39603. It is used only by df-cnvrefrels 39631. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefs = {𝑥 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))◡ S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-cnvrefrels 39631	Define the class of converse reflexive relations. This is practically dfcnvrefrels2 39633 (which uses the traditional subclass relation ⊆) : we use converse subset relation (brcnvssr 39611) here to ensure the comparability to the definitions of the classes of all reflexive (df-ref 23829), symmetric (df-syms 39647) and transitive (df-trs 39681) sets. We use this concept to define functions (df-funsALTV 39791, df-funALTV 39792) and disjoints (df-disjs 39814, df-disjALTV 39815). For sets, being an element of the class of converse reflexive relations is equivalent to satisfying the converse reflexive relation predicate, see elcnvrefrelsrel 39641. Alternate definitions are dfcnvrefrels2 39633 and dfcnvrefrels3 39634. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = ( CnvRefs ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-cnvrefrel 39632	Define the converse reflexive relation predicate (read: 𝑅 is a converse reflexive relation), see also the comment of dfcnvrefrel3 39636. Alternate definitions are dfcnvrefrel2 39635 and dfcnvrefrel3 39636. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrels2 39633	Alternate definition of the class of converse reflexive relations. See the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ 𝑟 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))}
Theorem	dfcnvrefrels3 39634*	Alternate definition of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel2 39635	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel3 39636*	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. A relation is converse reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if for an element of its domain and for an element of its range there is the relation between them, then the two elements are the same, cf. the comment of dfrefrel3 39621. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel4 39637	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel5 39638*	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elcnvrefrels2 39639	Element of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elcnvrefrels3 39640*	Element of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elcnvrefrelsrel 39641	For sets, being an element of the class of converse reflexive relations (df-cnvrefrels 39631) is equivalent to satisfying the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ CnvRefRel 𝑅))
Theorem	cnvrefrelcoss2 39642	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be a converse reflexive relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I )
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels2 39643	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels3 39644*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels4 39645*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels5 39646*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑅) = ∅) ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
21.28.11  Symmetry
Definition	df-syms 39647	Define the class of all symmetric sets. It is used only by df-symrels 39648. Note the similarity of Definitions df-refs 39615, df-syms 39647 and df-trs 39681, cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ Syms = {𝑥 ∣ ◡(𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-symrels 39648	Define the class of symmetric relations. For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate, see elsymrelsrel 39666. Alternate definitions are dfsymrels2 39650, dfsymrels3 39651, dfsymrels4 39656 and dfsymrels5 39657. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of reflexive (df-refrels 39616) and transitive (df-trrels 39682) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = ( Syms ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-symrel 39649	Define the symmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a symmetric relation.) For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations (df-symrels 39648) is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate, see elsymrelsrel 39666. Alternate definitions are dfsymrel2 39658 and dfsymrel3 39659. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡(𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrels2 39650	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. Cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}
Theorem	dfsymrels3 39651*	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}
Theorem	elrelscnveq3 39652*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	elrelscnveq 39653	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅))
Theorem	elrelscnveq2 39654*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	elrelscnveq4 39655*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	dfsymrels4 39656	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 = 𝑟}
Theorem	dfsymrels5 39657*	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}
Theorem	dfsymrel2 39658	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel3 39659*	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel4 39660	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel5 39661*	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elsymrels2 39662	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels3 39663*	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels4 39664	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels5 39665*	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrelsrel 39666	For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations (df-symrels 39648) is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ SymRel 𝑅))
Theorem	symreleq 39667	Equality theorem for symmetric relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ SymRel 𝑆))
Theorem	symrelim 39668	Symmetric relation implies that the domain and the range are equal. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 → dom 𝑅 = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	symrelcoss 39669	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Dec-2021.)
⊢ SymRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	idsymrel 39670	The identity relation is symmetric. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.)
⊢ SymRel I
Theorem	epnsymrel 39671	The membership (epsilon) relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ¬ SymRel E
21.28.12  Reflexivity and symmetry
Theorem	symrefref2 39672	Symmetry is a sufficient condition for the equivalence of two versions of the reflexive relation, see also symrefref3 39673. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅))
Theorem	symrefref3 39673*	Symmetry is a sufficient condition for the equivalence of two versions of the reflexive relation, see also symrefref2 39672. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	refsymrels2 39674	Elements of the class of reflexive relations which are elements of the class of symmetric relations as well (like the elements of the class of equivalence relations dfeqvrels2 39697) can use the restricted version for their reflexive part (see below), not just the ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟 version of dfrefrels2 39618, cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟)}
Theorem	refsymrels3 39675*	Elements of the class of reflexive relations which are elements of the class of symmetric relations as well (like the elements of the class of equivalence relations dfeqvrels3 39698) can use the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 version for their reflexive part, not just the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑟𝑦) version of dfrefrels3 39619, cf. the comment of dfrefrel3 39621. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑦𝑟𝑥))}
Theorem	refsymrel2 39676	A relation which is reflexive and symmetric (like an equivalence relation) can use the restricted version for their reflexive part (see below), not just the ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 version of dfrefrel2 39620, cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	refsymrel3 39677*	A relation which is reflexive and symmetric (like an equivalence relation) can use the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 version for its reflexive part, not just the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) version of dfrefrel3 39621, cf. the comment of dfrefrel3 39621. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elrefsymrels2 39678	Elements of the class of reflexive relations which are elements of the class of symmetric relations as well (like the elements of the class of equivalence relations dfeqvrels2 39697) can use the restricted version for their reflexive part (see below), not just the ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 version of dfrefrels2 39618, cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 39618. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefsymrels3 39679*	Elements of the class of reflexive relations which are elements of the class of symmetric relations as well (like the elements of the class of equivalence relations dfeqvrels3 39698) can use the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 version for their reflexive part, not just the ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) version of dfrefrels3 39619, cf. the comment of dfrefrel3 39621. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefsymrelsrel 39680	For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive and symmetric relations is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive and symmetric relation predicates. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
21.28.13  Transitivity
Definition	df-trs 39681	Define the class of all transitive sets (versus the transitive class defined in df-tr 5212). It is used only by df-trrels 39682. Note the similarity of the definitions of df-refs 39615, df-syms 39647 and df-trs 39681. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Trs = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) ∘ (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-trrels 39682	Define the class of transitive relations. For sets, being an element of the class of transitive relations is equivalent to satisfying the transitive relation predicate, see eltrrelsrel 39690. Alternate definitions are dftrrels2 39684 and dftrrels3 39685. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of reflexive (df-refrels 39616) and symmetric (df-symrels 39648) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ TrRels = ( Trs ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-trrel 39683	Define the transitive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a transitive relation.) For sets, being an element of the class of transitive relations (df-trrels 39682) is equivalent to satisfying the transitive relation predicate, see eltrrelsrel 39690. Alternate definitions are dftrrel2 39686 and dftrrel3 39687. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ (((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dftrrels2 39684	Alternate definition of the class of transitive relations. I'd prefer to define the class of transitive relations by using the definition of composition by [Suppes] p. 63. df-coSUP (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐴𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐵𝑦)} as opposed to the present definition of composition df-co 5659 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥𝐵𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝐴𝑦)} because the Suppes definition keeps the order of 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇 by default in trsinxpSUP (((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∘ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧)) while the present definition of composition disarranges them: trsinxp (((𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) ⊆ (𝑇 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶 )) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑆𝑧) → 𝑥𝑇𝑧) ). This is not mission critical to me, the implication of the Suppes definition is just more aesthetic, at least in the above case. If we swap to the Suppes definition of class composition, I would define the present class of all transitive sets as df-trsSUP and I would consider to switch the definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅 from the present df-coss 39526 to a df-cossSUP. But perhaps there is a mathematical reason to keep the present definition of composition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟}
Theorem	dftrrels3 39685*	Alternate definition of the class of transitive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ TrRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧)}
Theorem	dftrrel2 39686	Alternate definition of the transitive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dftrrel3 39687*	Alternate definition of the transitive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	eltrrels2 39688	Element of the class of transitive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TrRels ↔ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eltrrels3 39689*	Element of the class of transitive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TrRels ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eltrrelsrel 39690	For sets, being an element of the class of transitive relations is equivalent to satisfying the transitive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ TrRels ↔ TrRel 𝑅))
Theorem	trreleq 39691	Equality theorem for the transitive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ TrRel 𝑆))
Theorem	trrelressn 39692	Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' (see ressn2 39557) is transitive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2024.)
⊢ TrRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.28.14  Equivalence relations
Definition	df-eqvrels 39693	Define the class of equivalence relations. For sets, being an element of the class of equivalence relations is equivalent to satisfying the equivalence relation predicate, see eleqvrelsrel 39703. Alternate definitions are dfeqvrels2 39697 and dfeqvrels3 39698. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Nov-2018.)
⊢ EqvRels = (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ TrRels )
Definition	df-eqvrel 39694	Define the equivalence relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation.) For sets, being an element of the class of equivalence relations (df-eqvrels 39693) is equivalent to satisfying the equivalence relation predicate, see eleqvrelsrel 39703. Alternate definitions are dfeqvrel2 39699 and dfeqvrel3 39700. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅))
Definition	df-coeleqvrels 39695	Define the coelement equivalence relations class, the class of sets with coelement equivalence relations. For sets, being an element of the class of coelement equivalence relations is equivalent to satisfying the coelement equivalence relation predicate, see elcoeleqvrelsrel 39705. Alternate definition is dfcoeleqvrels 39730. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ CoElEqvRels = {𝑎 ∣ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) ∈ EqvRels }
Definition	df-coeleqvrel 39696	Define the coelement equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the coelement equivalence relation on 𝐴.) Alternate definition is dfcoeleqvrel 39731. For sets, being an element of the class of coelement equivalence relations is equivalent to satisfying the coelement equivalence relation predicate, see elcoeleqvrelsrel 39705. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ↔ EqvRel ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfeqvrels2 39697	Alternate definition of the class of equivalence relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ EqvRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)}
Theorem	dfeqvrels3 39698*	Alternate definition of the class of equivalence relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ EqvRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑦𝑟𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧))}
Theorem	dfeqvrel2 39699	Alternate definition of the equivalence relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfeqvrel3 39700*	Alternate definition of the equivalence relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))