P. 397 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39601-39700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eldisjn0elb 39601	Two forms of disjoint elements when the empty set is not an element of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	disjxrn 39602	Two ways of saying that a range Cartesian product is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ∩ ≀ ◡𝑆) ⊆ I )
Theorem	disjxrnres5 39603*	Disjoint range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅))
Theorem	disjorimxrn 39604	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∨ Disj 𝑆) → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimxrn 39605	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimres 39606	Disjointness condition for restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Disj (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjimin 39607	Disjointness condition for intersection. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjiminres 39608	Disjointness condition for intersection with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjimxrnres 39609	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjALTV0 39610	The null class is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ∅
Theorem	disjALTVid 39611	The class of identity relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Disj I
Theorem	disjALTVidres 39612	The class of identity relations restricted is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjALTVinidres 39613	The intersection with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjALTVxrnidres 39614	The class of range Cartesian product with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjsuc 39615*	Disjoint range Cartesian product, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ suc 𝐴)) ↔ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsim 39616	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (implication form): under the Disjs condition on QMap 𝑅, the coset assignment is injective on dom 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsbi 39617	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (biconditional form). Convenience version of qmapeldisjsim 39616. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	rnqmapeleldisjsim 39618	Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21.27.20  Antisymmetry
Definition	df-antisymrel 39619	Define the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel4 39620	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel5 39621*	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	antisymrelres 39622*	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	antisymrelressn 39623	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jun-2024.)
⊢ AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.27.21  Partitions: disjoints on domain quotients
Definition	df-parts 39624	Define the class of all partitions, cf. the comment of df-disjs 39545. Partitions are disjoints on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to disjoints). This is a more general meaning of partition than we we are familiar with: the conventional meaning of partition (e.g. partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 39545) is what we call membership partition here, cf. dfmembpart2 39629. The binary partitions relation and the partition predicate are the same, that is, (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴) if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39632. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Parts = ( DomainQss ↾ Disjs )
Definition	df-part 39625	Define the partition predicate (read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅). Alternative definition is dfpart2 39628. The binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39632. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-membparts 39626	Define the class of member partition relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ MembParts = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Parts 𝑎}
Definition	df-membpart 39627	Define the member partition predicate, or the disjoint restricted element relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) A alternative definition is dfmembpart2 39629. Member partition is the conventional meaning of partition (see the notes of df-parts 39624 and dfmembpart2 39629), we generalize the concept in df-parts 39624 and df-part 39625. Member partition and comember equivalence are the same by mpet 39709. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	dfpart2 39628	Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfmembpart2 39629	Alternate definition of the conventional membership case of partition. Partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	brparts 39630	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	brparts2 39631	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	brpartspart 39632	Binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq1 39633	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq2 39634	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq12 39635	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq1i 39636	Equality theorem for partition, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴)
Theorem	parteq1d 39637	Equality theorem for partition, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	partsuc2 39638	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part ((𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	partsuc 39639	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
21.27.22  Partition-Equivalence Theorems
Theorem	disjim 39640	The "Divide et Aequivalere" Theorem: every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation: generalization of the former prter1 39760, cf. eldisjim 39643. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	disjimi 39641	Every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	detlem 39642	If a relation is disjoint, then it is equivalent to the equivalent cosets of the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjim 39643	If the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint, then it has equivalent coelements (former prter1 39760). Special case of disjim 39640. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 13-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 8-Feb-2018.) ( Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → CoElEqvRel 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjim2 39644	Alternate form of eldisjim 39643. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → EqvRel ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel0 39645	The null class is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ∅
Theorem	det0 39646	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation if and only if the null class is disjoint (which it is, see disjALTV0 39610). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ∅ ↔ EqvRel ≀ ∅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss0 39647	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ∅
Theorem	eqvrelid 39648	The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel I
Theorem	eqvrel1cossidres 39649	The cosets by a restricted identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel1cossinidres 39650	The cosets by an intersection with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39651	The cosets by a range Cartesian product with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detid 39652	The cosets by the identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj I ↔ EqvRel ≀ I )
Theorem	eqvrelcossid 39653	The cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ I
Theorem	detidres 39654	The cosets by the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detinidres 39655	The cosets by the intersection with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the intersection with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	detxrnidres 39656	The cosets by the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjlem14 39657*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664, partim2 39666 and petlem 39671 via disjlem17 39658, (general version of the former prtlem14 39755). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝑦]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem17 39658*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664, partim2 39666 and petlem 39671 via disjlem18 39659, (general version of the former prtlem17 39757). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem18 39659*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664, partim2 39666 and petlem 39671 via disjlem19 39660, (general version of the former prtlem18 39758). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))
Theorem	disjlem19 39660*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664, partim2 39666 and petlem 39671 via disjdmqs 39663, (general version of the former prtlem19 39759). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝐴] ≀ 𝑅)))
Theorem	disjdmqsss 39661	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664 via disjdmqs 39663. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ⊆ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqscossss 39662	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39664 via disjdmqs 39663. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqs 39663	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to the domain quotient of the cosets by it. Lemma for partim2 39666 and petlem 39671 via disjdmqseq 39664. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqseq 39664	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to a class if and only if the domain quotient of the cosets by it is equal to the class. General version of eldisjn0el 39665 (which is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39762). Lemma for partim2 39666 and petlem 39671. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjn0el 39665	Special case of disjdmqseq 39664 (perhaps this is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39762). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim2 39666	Disjoint relation on its natural domain implies an equivalence relation on the cosets of the relation, on its natural domain, cf. partim 39667. Lemma for petlem 39671. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim 39667	Partition implies equivalence relation by the cosets of the relation on its natural domain, cf. partim2 39666. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ≀ 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	partimeq 39668	Partition implies that the class of coelements on the natural domain is equal to the class of cosets of the relation, cf. erimeq 39520. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ∼ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjlem19 39669*	Special case of disjlem19 39660 (together with membpartlem19 39670, this is former prtlem19 39759). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	membpartlem19 39670*	Together with disjlem19 39660, this is former prtlem19 39759. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( MembPart 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	petlem 39671	If you can prove that the equivalence of cosets on their natural domain implies disjointness (e.g. eqvrelqseqdisj5 39703), or converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39554), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. Lemma for the Partition Equivalence Theorem pet2 39720. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petlemi 39672	If you can prove disjointness (e.g. disjALTV0 39610, disjALTVid 39611, disjALTVidres 39612, disjALTVxrnidres 39614, search for theorems containing the ' |- Disj ' string), or the same with converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39554), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet02 39673	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ∅ ∧ (dom ∅ / ∅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ∅ ∧ (dom ≀ ∅ / ≀ ∅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet0 39674	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∅ Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ∅ ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petid2 39675	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj I ∧ (dom I / I ) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ I ∧ (dom ≀ I / ≀ I ) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petid 39676	A class is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( I Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ I ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petidres2 39677	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petidres 39678	A class is a partition by identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it, cf. eqvrel1cossidres 39649. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petinidres2 39679	Class 𝐴 is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petinidres 39680	A class is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossinidres 39295, disjALTVinidres 39613 and eqvrel1cossinidres 39650. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petxrnidres2 39681	Class 𝐴 is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petxrnidres 39682	A class is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossxrnidres 39297, disjALTVxrnidres 39614 and eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39651. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvreldisj1 39683*	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj2 39684, eqvreldisj3 39685). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 3-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj2 39684	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj3 39685). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ElDisj (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj3 39685	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. qsdisj2 8799). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (◡ E ↾ (𝐴 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	eqvreldisj4 39686	Intersection with the converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ∩ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvreldisj5 39687	Range Cartesian product with converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj2 39688	Implication of eqvreldisj2 39684, lemma for The Main Theorem of Equivalences mainer 39704. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ElDisj 𝐴)
Theorem	disjimeldisjdmqs 39689	Disj implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Supplies the carrier-disjointness half of the Disjs pattern: under Disj 𝑅, the coset family is element-disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjsim1 39690	An element of the class of disjoint relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → Disj 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjsim2 39691	An element of the class of disjoint relations is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → 𝑅 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	disjsssrels 39692	The class of disjoint relations is a subclass of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs ⊆ Rels
Theorem	eldisjsim3 39693	Disjs implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Exports the carrier-disjointness property in the ElDisjs packaging. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim4 39694	Disjs implies element-disjoint range of QMap. Same as eldisjsim3 39693 but expressed using the block-map range ran QMap 𝑅 (often the more modular expression). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim5 39695	Disjs is closed under QMap. If a relation is "disjoint-structured" (Disjs), then its canonical block map is also "disjoint-structured". This is the second "structure level" in Disjs: it expresses that the property is stable under passing to the canonical block map, a theme that mirrors Pet-grade stability at a different axis. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )
Theorem	eldisjs6 39696	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. A relation 𝑅 is in Disjs iff: it is relation-typed, and its quotient-map QMap 𝑅 is itself disjoint, and its quotient-carrier ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) lies in ElDisjs (element-disjoint carriers). This is the central "stability-by-decomposition" theorem for Disjs: it explains why Disjs is internally well-behaved without adding an external stability clause. It is the exact template that PetParts imitates: for pet 39721, the analogue of "map layer" is the disjointness of the lifted span, the analogue of "carrier layer" is the block-lift fixpoint (BlockLiftFix), and then adds external grade stability (SucMap ShiftStable) which Disjs does not need. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )))
Theorem	eldisjs7 39697*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. 𝑅 ∈ Disjs iff: 𝑅 ∈ Rels, and every 𝑥 belongs to at most one block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) (element-disjointness at the carrier), and every block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier has a unique representative 𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 such that 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅. Provides the "fully expanded" quantifier characterization of the same decomposition as eldisjs6 39696, but without explicitly mentioning QMap. This is the "E*/E!"" view that is closest in spirit to suc11reg 9602-style injectivity and to the "unique generator per block" narrative. It is also the right contrast-point to older one-line criteria like dfdisjs4 39552 (the "u R x" style), because it makes the carrier and representation discipline explicit and type-safe. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅)))
Theorem	dfdisjs6 39698	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via quotient-map stability). Disjs is the class of relations 𝑟 whose quotient-map QMap 𝑟 is again disjoint and whose induced quotient-carrier is element-disjoint. This is the definitional "stability-by-decomposition" packaging of disjointness: it builds Disjs from two internal layers (i) a carrier-layer constraint and (ii) a map-layer closure constraint. This is deliberately different from "u R x" style definitions: it makes the carrier of blocks and the uniqueness-of-representatives discipline first-class and reusable (via QMap) rather than implicit. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (ran QMap 𝑟 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑟 ∈ Disjs )}
Theorem	dfdisjs7 39699*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via carrier disjointness + unique representatives). Ideology-free normal form of dfdisjs6 39698: "blocks cover their elements" (∃*) and "each block has a unique generator" (∃!), expressed entirely at the quotient-carrier level. Same class as dfdisjs6 39698, but presented in fully expanded ∃* / ∃! form over the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟). Makes explicit (a) element-disjointness of the quotient-carrier and (b) unique representative existence for each block. These are exactly the two conditions that rule out type-confusions (blocks vs witnesses) and ensure canonical decomposition. This is the form that best supports analogy arguments with df-petparts 39724 and with successor-style uniqueness patterns. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑟)}
Theorem	fences3 39700	Implication of eqvrelqseqdisj2 39688 and n0eldmqseq 39490, see comment of fences 39714. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))