Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ackbij1lem1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for ackbij2 9999. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ackbij1lem1 | ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-suc 6272 | . . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) | |
2 | 1 | ineq2i 4143 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) |
3 | indi 4207 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) | |
4 | 2, 3 | eqtri 2766 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) |
5 | disjsn 4647 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
6 | 5 | biimpri 227 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅) |
7 | 6 | uneq2d 4097 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅)) |
8 | un0 4324 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) | |
9 | 7, 8 | eqtrdi 2794 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
10 | 4, 9 | eqtrid 2790 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 ∪ cun 3885 ∩ cin 3886 ∅c0 4256 {csn 4561 suc csuc 6268 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-ral 3069 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-nul 4257 df-sn 4562 df-suc 6272 |
This theorem is referenced by: ackbij1lem15 9990 ackbij1lem16 9991 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |