Theorem ackbij1lem1 10218

Description: Lemma for ackbij2 10241. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ackbij1lem1	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6370	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
2	1	ineq2i 4170	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
3		indi 4237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
4	2, 3	eqtri 2788	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
5		disjsn 4679	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
6	5	biimpri 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅)
7	6	uneq2d 4122	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅))
8		un0 4351	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2816	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
10	4, 9	eqtrid 2812	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ∪ cun 3904   ∩ cin 3905  ∅c0 4286  {csn 4591  suc csuc 6366

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ral 3082  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-nul 4287  df-sn 4592  df-suc 6370

This theorem is used by:  ackbij1lem15  10232  ackbij1lem16  10233