Theorem ackbij1lem1 10259

Description: Lemma for ackbij2 10282. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ackbij1lem1	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6390	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
2	1	ineq2i 4217	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
3		indi 4284	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
4	2, 3	eqtri 2765	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
5		disjsn 4711	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
6	5	biimpri 228	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅)
7	6	uneq2d 4168	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅))
8		un0 4394	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2793	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
10	4, 9	eqtrid 2789	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108   ∪ cun 3949   ∩ cin 3950  ∅c0 4333  {csn 4626  suc csuc 6386

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3062  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-nul 4334  df-sn 4627  df-suc 6390

This theorem is referenced by:  ackbij1lem15  10273  ackbij1lem16  10274