Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ackbij1lem1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for ackbij2 9862. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ackbij1lem1 | ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-suc 6224 | . . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) | |
2 | 1 | ineq2i 4129 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) |
3 | indi 4193 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) | |
4 | 2, 3 | eqtri 2765 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) |
5 | disjsn 4632 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
6 | 5 | biimpri 231 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅) |
7 | 6 | uneq2d 4082 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅)) |
8 | un0 4310 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) | |
9 | 7, 8 | eqtrdi 2794 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
10 | 4, 9 | eqtrid 2789 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 = wceq 1543 ∈ wcel 2110 ∪ cun 3869 ∩ cin 3870 ∅c0 4242 {csn 4546 suc csuc 6220 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-ext 2708 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-tru 1546 df-fal 1556 df-ex 1788 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-ral 3066 df-rab 3070 df-v 3415 df-dif 3874 df-un 3876 df-in 3878 df-nul 4243 df-sn 4547 df-suc 6224 |
This theorem is referenced by: ackbij1lem15 9853 ackbij1lem16 9854 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |