Theorem ackbij1lem1 10336

Description: Lemma for ackbij2 10359. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ackbij1lem1	⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6394	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
2	1	ineq2i 4117	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
3		indi 4232	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
4	2, 3	eqtri 2786	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
5		disjsn 4673	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
6	5	biimpri 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = ∅)
7	6	uneq2d 4170	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅))
8		un0 4347	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ ∅) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2814	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
10	4, 9	eqtrid 2810	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ∩ cin 4092   ∪ cun 4152  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588  suc csuc 6390

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-sn 4589  df-suc 6394

This theorem is used by:  ackbij1lem15  10350  ackbij1lem16  10351