MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ackbij1lem2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ackbij1lem2 9632
Description: Lemma for ackbij2 9654. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ackbij1lem2 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6165 . . . 4 suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
21ineq2i 4136 . . 3 (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
3 indi 4200 . . 3 (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
4 uncom 4080 . . 3 ((𝐵𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴))
52, 3, 43eqtri 2825 . 2 (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴))
6 snssi 4701 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵)
7 sseqin2 4142 . . . 4 ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = {𝐴})
86, 7sylib 221 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = {𝐴})
98uneq1d 4089 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))
105, 9syl5eq 2845 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4   = wceq 1538  wcel 2111  cun 3879  cin 3880  wss 3881  {csn 4525  suc csuc 6161
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-sn 4526  df-suc 6165
This theorem is referenced by:  ackbij1lem15  9645  ackbij1lem16  9646
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator