MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ackbij1lem2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ackbij1lem2 9645
Description: Lemma for ackbij2 9667. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ackbij1lem2 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6199 . . . 4 suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
21ineq2i 4188 . . 3 (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
3 indi 4252 . . 3 (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}))
4 uncom 4131 . . 3 ((𝐵𝐴) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴})) = ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴))
52, 3, 43eqtri 2850 . 2 (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴))
6 snssi 4743 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵)
7 sseqin2 4194 . . . 4 ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = {𝐴})
86, 7sylib 220 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) = {𝐴})
98uneq1d 4140 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝐵 ∩ {𝐴}) ∪ (𝐵𝐴)) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))
105, 9syl5eq 2870 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵𝐴)))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4   = wceq 1537  wcel 2114  cun 3936  cin 3937  wss 3938  {csn 4569  suc csuc 6195
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-sn 4570  df-suc 6199
This theorem is referenced by:  ackbij1lem15  9658  ackbij1lem16  9659
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator