Theorem bj-ismooredr 37604

Description: Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the only hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismooredr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elpwi 4564	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
2		bj-ismooredr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ex 416	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 3	syl5 34	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	ralrimiv 3155	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
6		bj-ismoore 37600	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sylibr 236	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3078   ∩ cin 3905   ⊆ wss 3906  𝒫 cpw 4557  ∪ cuni 4867  ∩ cint 4907  Moorecmoore 37598

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pow 5324

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-pw 4559  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-bj-moore 37599

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ismooredr2  37605  bj-discrmoore  37606