Theorem bj-ismooredr 37779

Description: Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the only hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismooredr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elpwi 4568	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
2		bj-ismooredr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ex 417	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 3	syl5 35	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	ralrimiv 3155	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
6		bj-ismoore 37775	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904  𝒫 cpw 4561  ∪ cuni 4871  ∩ cint 4911  Moorecmoore 37773

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-pw 4563  df-uni 4872  df-int 4912  df-bj-moore 37774

This theorem is used by:  bj-ismooredr2  37780  bj-discrmoore  37781