Theorem bj-ismooredr 37950

Description: Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the only hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismooredr	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismooredr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elpwi 4563	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
2		bj-ismooredr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ex 418	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 3	syl5 35	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	ralrimiv 3153	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
6		bj-ismoore 37946	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076   ∩ cin 3897   ⊆ wss 3898  𝒫 cpw 4556  ∪ cuni 4866  ∩ cint 4906  Moorecmoore 37944

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3901  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4279  df-pw 4558  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-bj-moore 37945

This theorem is used by:  bj-ismooredr2  37951  bj-discrmoore  37952