Theorem bj-ismoore 38068

Description: Characterization of Moore collections. There is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is implied by either side (this is obvious for the LHS, and is the content of bj-mooreset 38065 for the RHS). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismoore	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismoore

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3471	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		bj-mooreset 38065	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		pweq 4570	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝑦 = 𝒫 𝐴)
4		unieq 4877	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑦 = ∪ 𝐴)
5	4	ineq1d 4116	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) = (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥))
6		id 23	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
7	5, 6	eleq12d 2854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	3, 7	raleqbidv 3334	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9		df-bj-moore 38067	. . 3 ⊢ Moore = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦}
10	8, 9	elab2g 3633	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
11	1, 2, 10	pm5.21nii 381	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450   ∩ cin 4089  𝒫 cpw 4556  ∪ cuni 4866  ∩ cint 4906  Moorecmoore 38066

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-nul 4279  df-pw 4558  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-bj-moore 38067

This theorem is used by:  bj-ismoored0  38069  bj-ismoored  38070  bj-ismooredr  38072