Theorem bj-ismoore 38217

Description: Characterization of Moore collections. There is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is implied by either side (this is obvious for the LHS, and is the content of bj-mooreset 38214 for the RHS). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismoore	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismoore

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3475	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		bj-mooreset 38214	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		pweq 4574	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝑦 = 𝒫 𝐴)
4		unieq 4881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑦 = ∪ 𝐴)
5	4	ineq1d 4119	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) = (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥))
6		id 23	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
7	5, 6	eleq12d 2858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	3, 7	raleqbidv 3338	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9		df-bj-moore 38216	. . 3 ⊢ Moore = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦}
10	8, 9	elab2g 3637	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
11	1, 2, 10	pm5.21nii 381	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 4092  𝒫 cpw 4560  ∪ cuni 4870  ∩ cint 4910  Moorecmoore 38215

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-nul 4282  df-pw 4562  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-bj-moore 38216

This theorem is used by:  bj-ismoored0  38218  bj-ismoored  38219  bj-ismooredr  38221