Theorem bj-ismoore 36078

Description: Characterization of Moore collections. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is implied by either side (this is obvious for the LHS, and is the content of bj-mooreset 36075 for the RHS). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ismoore	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem bj-ismoore

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3492	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		bj-mooreset 36075	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		pweq 4616	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝒫 𝑦 = 𝒫 𝐴)
4		unieq 4919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑦 = ∪ 𝐴)
5	4	ineq1d 4211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) = (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥))
6		id 22	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
7	5, 6	eleq12d 2827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	3, 7	raleqbidv 3342	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9		df-bj-moore 36077	. . 3 ⊢ Moore = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(∪ 𝑦 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝑦}
10	8, 9	elab2g 3670	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
11	1, 2, 10	pm5.21nii 379	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3061  Vcvv 3474   ∩ cin 3947  𝒫 cpw 4602  ∪ cuni 4908  ∩ cint 4950  Moorecmoore 36076

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3951  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-pw 4604  df-uni 4909  df-int 4951  df-bj-moore 36077

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ismoored0  36079  bj-ismoored  36080  bj-ismooredr  36082