Theorem bnj98 35064

Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 35073. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj98	⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem bnj98

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3437	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑖 ∈ V
2	1	sucid 6398	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑖
3	2	n0ii 4274	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ suc 𝑖 = ∅
4		df-suc 6320	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑖 = (𝑖 ∪ {𝑖})
5		df-un 3890	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 ∪ {𝑖}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})}
6	4, 5	eqtri 2764	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑖 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})}
7		df1o2 8406	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
8	6, 7	eleq12i 2834	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} ∈ {∅})
9		elsni 4575	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} ∈ {∅} → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} = ∅)
10	8, 9	sylbi 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} = ∅)
11	6, 10	eqtrid 2788	. . . 4 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → suc 𝑖 = ∅)
12	3, 11	mto 199	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o
13	12	pm2.21i 119	. 2 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
14	13	rgenw 3059	1 ⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 854   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  {cab 2719  ∀wral 3055   ∪ cun 3883  ∅c0 4264  {csn 4558  ∪ ciun 4924  suc csuc 6316  ‘cfv 6489  ωcom 7810  1_oc1o 8392   predc-bnj14 34886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3056  df-v 3435  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-nul 4265  df-sn 4559  df-suc 6320  df-1o 8399

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj150  35073