Theorem bnj98 34712

Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 34721. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj98	⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem bnj98

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3466	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑖 ∈ V
2	1	sucid 6458	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑖
3	2	n0ii 4339	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ suc 𝑖 = ∅
4		df-suc 6382	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑖 = (𝑖 ∪ {𝑖})
5		df-un 3952	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 ∪ {𝑖}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})}
6	4, 5	eqtri 2754	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑖 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})}
7		df1o2 8503	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
8	6, 7	eleq12i 2819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} ∈ {∅})
9		elsni 4650	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} ∈ {∅} → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} = ∅)
10	8, 9	sylbi 216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑖})} = ∅)
11	6, 10	eqtrid 2778	. . . 4 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → suc 𝑖 = ∅)
12	3, 11	mto 196	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o
13	12	pm2.21i 119	. 2 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
14	13	rgenw 3055	1 ⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 845   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  {cab 2703  ∀wral 3051   ∪ cun 3945  ∅c0 4325  {csn 4633  ∪ ciun 5001  suc csuc 6378  ‘cfv 6554  ωcom 7876  1_oc1o 8489   predc-bnj14 34533

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3052  df-v 3464  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-nul 4326  df-sn 4634  df-suc 6382  df-1o 8496

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj150  34721