| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 339 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | lindsunlem 33801 | Lemma for lindsun 33802. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘𝑈) ∩ (𝑁‘𝑉)) = { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐹 ∖ {𝑂})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)𝐶) ∈ (𝑁‘((𝑈 ∪ 𝑉) ∖ {𝐶}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | lindsun 33802 | Condition for the union of two independent sets to be an independent set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘𝑈) ∩ (𝑁‘𝑉)) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉) ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | lbsdiflsp0 33803 | The linear spans of two disjunct independent sets only have a trivial intersection. This can be seen as the opposite direction of lindsun 33802. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐽 = (LBasis‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑁‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑉)) ∩ (𝑁‘𝑉)) = { 0 }) | ||
| Theorem | dimkerim 33804 | Given a linear map 𝐹 between vector spaces 𝑉 and 𝑈, the dimension of the vector space 𝑉 is the sum of the dimension of 𝐹 's kernel and the dimension of 𝐹's image. Second part of theorem 5.3 in [Lang] p. 141 This can also be described as the Rank-nullity theorem, (dim‘𝐼) being the rank of 𝐹 (the dimension of its image), and (dim‘𝐾) its nullity (the dimension of its kernel). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑉 ↾s (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑈 ↾s ran 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑉 LMHom 𝑈)) → (dim‘𝑉) = ((dim‘𝐾) +𝑒 (dim‘𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | qusdimsum 33805 | Let 𝑊 be a vector space, and let 𝑋 be a subspace. Then the dimension of 𝑊 is the sum of the dimension of 𝑋 and the dimension of the quotient space of 𝑋. First part of theorem 5.3 in [Lang] p. 141. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑊 /s (𝑊 ~QG 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊)) → (dim‘𝑊) = ((dim‘𝑋) +𝑒 (dim‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | fedgmullem1 33806* | Lemma for fedgmul 33808. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑖(.r‘𝐸)𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:𝑌⟶(Base‘(Scalar‘𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = (𝐵 Σg (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ((𝐿‘𝑗)( ·𝑠 ‘𝐵)𝑗)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶((Base‘(Scalar‘𝐶)) ↑m 𝑋)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐺‘𝑗) finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐶))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐿‘𝑗) = (𝐶 Σg (𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖)( ·𝑠 ‘𝐶)𝑖)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝑍 = (𝐴 Σg (𝐻 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐴)𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | fedgmullem2 33807* | Lemma for fedgmul 33808. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑖(.r‘𝐸)𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐺‘𝑗)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (LBasis‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (Base‘((Scalar‘𝐴) freeLMod (𝑌 × 𝑋)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 Σg (𝑊 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐴)𝐷)) = (0g‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 = ((𝑌 × 𝑋) × {(0g‘(Scalar‘𝐴))})) | ||
| Theorem | fedgmul 33808 | The multiplicativity formula for degrees of field extensions. Given 𝐸 a field extension of 𝐹, itself a field extension of 𝐾, we have [𝐸:𝐾] = [𝐸:𝐹][𝐹:𝐾]. Proposition 1.2 of [Lang], p. 224. Here (dim‘𝐴) is the degree of the extension 𝐸 of 𝐾, (dim‘𝐵) is the degree of the extension 𝐸 of 𝐹, and (dim‘𝐶) is the degree of the extension 𝐹 of 𝐾. This proof is valid for infinite dimensions, and is actually valid for division ring extensions, not just field extensions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((subringAlg ‘𝐹)‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) = ((dim‘𝐵) ·e (dim‘𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | dimlssid 33809 | If the dimension of a linear subspace 𝐿 is the dimension of the whole vector space 𝐸, then 𝐿 is the whole space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐸) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐿)) = (dim‘𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lvecendof1f1o 33810 | If an endomorphism 𝑈 of a vector space 𝐸 of finite dimension is injective, then it is bijective. Item (b) of Corollary of Proposition 9 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 298 . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐸) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐸 LMHom 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:𝐵–1-1→𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lactlmhm 33811* | In an associative algebra 𝐴, left-multiplication by a fixed element of the algebra is a module homomorphism, analogous to ringlghm 20259. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 LMHom 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | assalactf1o 33812* | In an associative algebra 𝐴, left-multiplication by a fixed element of the algebra is bijective. See also lactlmhm 33811. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | assarrginv 33813 | If an element 𝑋 of an associative algebra 𝐴 over a division ring 𝐾 is regular, then it is a unit. Proposition 2. in Chapter 5. of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 113. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | assafld 33814 | If an algebra 𝐴 of finite degree over a division ring 𝐾 is an integral domain, then it is a field. Corollary of Proposition 2. in Chapter 5. of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 113. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ AssAlg) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ IDomn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Field) | ||
| Syntax | cfldext 33815 | Syntax for the field extension relation. |
| class /FldExt | ||
| Syntax | cfinext 33816 | Syntax for the finite field extension relation. |
| class /FinExt | ||
| Syntax | cextdg 33817 | Syntax for the field extension degree operation. |
| class [:] | ||
| Definition | df-fldext 33818* | Definition of the field extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ /FldExt = {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ ((𝑒 ∈ Field ∧ 𝑓 ∈ Field) ∧ (𝑓 = (𝑒 ↾s (Base‘𝑓)) ∧ (Base‘𝑓) ∈ (SubRing‘𝑒)))} | ||
| Definition | df-extdg 33819* | Definition of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ [:] = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ (/FldExt “ {𝑒}) ↦ (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝑒)‘(Base‘𝑓)))) | ||
| Definition | df-finext 33820* | Definition of the finite field extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ /FinExt = {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ (𝑒/FldExt𝑓 ∧ (𝑒[:]𝑓) ∈ ℕ0)} | ||
| Theorem | relfldext 33821 | The field extension is a relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ Rel /FldExt | ||
| Theorem | brfldext 33822 | The field extension relation explicited. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Field) → (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)))) | ||
| Theorem | ccfldextrr 33823 | The field of the complex numbers is an extension of the field of the real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℂfld/FldExtℝfld | ||
| Theorem | fldextfld1 33824 | A field extension is only defined if the extension is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | fldextfld2 33825 | A field extension is only defined if the subfield is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | fldextsubrg 33826 | Field extension implies a subring relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | sdrgfldext 33827 | A field 𝐸 and any sub-division-ring 𝐹 of 𝐸 form a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fldextress 33828 | Field extension implies a structure restriction relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | brfinext 33829 | The finite field extension relation explicited. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸/FinExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐸[:]𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)) | ||
| Theorem | extdgval 33830 | Value of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸[:]𝐹) = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘(Base‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | fldextsdrg 33831 | Deduce sub-division-ring from field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | fldextsralvec 33832 | The subring algebra associated with a field extension is a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → ((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘(Base‘𝐹)) ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | extdgcl 33833 | Closure of the field extension degree operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸[:]𝐹) ∈ ℕ0*) | ||
| Theorem | extdggt0 33834 | Degrees of field extension are greater than zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 0 < (𝐸[:]𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fldexttr 33835 | Field extension is a transitive relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → 𝐸/FldExt𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | fldextid 33836 | The field extension relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹/FldExt𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | extdgid 33837 | A trivial field extension has degree one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸 ∈ Field → (𝐸[:]𝐸) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | fldsdrgfldext 33838 | A sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹/FldExt𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fldsdrgfldext2 33839 | A sub-sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺/FldExt𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | extdgmul 33840 | The multiplicativity formula for degrees of field extensions. Given 𝐸 a field extension of 𝐹, itself a field extension of 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐾 is the product of the degrees of the extensions 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 and 𝐹/FldExt𝐾. Proposition 1.2 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸[:]𝐾) = ((𝐸[:]𝐹) ·e (𝐹[:]𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | finextfldext 33841 | A finite field extension is a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FinExt𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | finexttrb 33842 | The extension 𝐸 of 𝐾 is finite if and only if 𝐸 is finite over 𝐹 and 𝐹 is finite over 𝐾. Corollary 1.3 of [Lang] , p. 225. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸/FinExt𝐾 ↔ (𝐸/FinExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FinExt𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | extdg1id 33843 | If the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1, then 𝐸 and 𝐹 are identical. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | extdg1b 33844 | The degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1 iff 𝐸 and 𝐹 are the same structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → ((𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenfldext 33845 | A subfield 𝐹 extended with a set 𝐴 forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿/FldExt𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | fldextchr 33846 | The characteristic of a subfield is the same as the characteristic of the larger field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (chr‘𝐹) = (chr‘𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | evls1fldgencl 33847 | Closure of the subring polynomial evaluation in the field extention. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) | ||
| Theorem | ccfldsrarelvec 33848 | The subring algebra of the complex numbers over the real numbers is a left vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) ∈ LVec | ||
| Theorem | ccfldextdgrr 33849 | The degree of the field extension of the complex numbers over the real numbers is 2. (Suggested by GL, 4-Aug-2023.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld[:]ℝfld) = 2 | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspunlsplem 33850* | Lemma for fldextrspunlsp 33851: First direction. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:𝐻⟶𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 finSupp (0g‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑓)(.r‘𝐿)𝑓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝐺 ↑m 𝐵)(𝑎 finSupp (0g‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑏)(.r‘𝐿)𝑏))))) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspunlsp 33851 | Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33853. The subring generated by the union of two field extensions 𝐺 and 𝐻 is the vector sub- 𝐺 space generated by a basis 𝐵 of 𝐻. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((LSpan‘((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐺))‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspunlem1 33852 | Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33853. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐺)) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspunfld 33853 | The ring generated by the union of two field extensions is a field. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspunlem2 33854 | Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspundgle 33855 | Inequality involving the degree of two different field extensions 𝐼 and 𝐽 of a same field 𝐹. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspundglemul 33856 | Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, 𝐽 / 𝐾 being finite, and the composiste field 𝐸 = 𝐼𝐽, the degree of the extension of the composite field 𝐸 / 𝐾 is at most the product of the field extension degrees of 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐾) ≤ ((𝐼[:]𝐾) ·e (𝐽[:]𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspundgdvdslem 33857 | Lemma for fldextrspundgdvds 33858. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | fldextrspundgdvds 33858 | Given two finite extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐼 / 𝐾 divides the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾, 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∥ (𝐸[:]𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | fldext2rspun 33859* | Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾, 𝐼 / 𝐾 being a quadratic extension, and the degree of 𝐽 / 𝐾 being a power of 2, the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾 is a power of 2 , 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) = 2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐸[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑛)) | ||
| Syntax | cirng 33860 | Integral subring of a ring. |
| class IntgRing | ||
| Definition | df-irng 33861* | Define the subring of elements of a ring 𝑟 integral over a subset 𝑠. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ IntgRing = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝑟 ↾s 𝑠))(◡((𝑟 evalSub1 𝑠)‘𝑓) “ {(0g‘𝑟)})) | ||
| Theorem | irngval 33862* | The elements of a field 𝑅 integral over a subset 𝑆. In the case of a subfield, those are the algebraic numbers over the field 𝑆 within the field 𝑅. That is, the numbers 𝑋 which are roots of monic polynomials 𝑃(𝑋) with coefficients in 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)(◡(𝑂‘𝑓) “ { 0 })) | ||
| Theorem | elirng 33863* | Property for an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 to be integral over a subring 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)((𝑂‘𝑓)‘𝑋) = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | irngss 33864 | All elements of a subring 𝑆 are integral over 𝑆. This is only true in the case of a nonzero ring, since there are no integral elements in a zero ring (see 0ringirng 33866). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | irngssv 33865 | An integral element is an element of the base set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 0ringirng 33866 | A zero ring 𝑅 has no integral elements. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | irngnzply1lem 33867 | In the case of a field 𝐸, a root 𝑋 of some nonzero polynomial 𝑃 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 is integral over 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ dom 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝑃)‘𝑋) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | irngnzply1 33868* | In the case of a field 𝐸, the roots of nonzero polynomials 𝑝 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 are exactly the integral elements over 𝐹. Roots of nonzero polynomials are called algebraic numbers, so this shows that in the case of a field, elements integral over 𝐹 are exactly the algebraic numbers. In this formula, dom 𝑂 represents the polynomials, and 𝑍 the zero polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹) = ∪ 𝑝 ∈ (dom 𝑂 ∖ {𝑍})(◡(𝑂‘𝑝) “ { 0 })) | ||
| Theorem | extdgfialglem1 33869* | Lemma for extdgfialg 33871. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ (0...𝐷) ↦ (𝑛(.g‘(mulGrp‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)))𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝐹 ↑m (0...𝐷))(𝑎 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ ((𝐸 Σg (𝑎 ∘f · 𝐺)) = 𝑍 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ((0...𝐷) × {𝑍})))) | ||
| Theorem | extdgfialglem2 33870* | Lemma for extdgfialg 33871. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ (0...𝐷) ↦ (𝑛(.g‘(mulGrp‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)))𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:(0...𝐷)⟶𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 Σg (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐺)) = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ((0...𝐷) × {𝑍})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | extdgfialg 33871 | A finite field extension 𝐸 / 𝐹 is algebraic. Part of the proof of Proposition 1.1 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹) = 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | calgext 33872 | Syntax for the algebraic field extension relation. |
| class /AlgExt | ||
| Definition | df-algext 33873* | Definition of the algebraic extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ /AlgExt = {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ (𝑒/FldExt𝑓 ∧ (𝑒 IntgRing (Base‘𝑓)) = (Base‘𝑒))} | ||
| Theorem | bralgext 33874 | Express the fact that a field extension 𝐸 / 𝐹 is algebraic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸/AlgExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐶) = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | finextalg 33875 | A finite field extension is algebraic. Proposition 1.1 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FinExt𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/AlgExt𝐹) | ||
| Syntax | cminply 33876 | Extend class notation with the minimal polynomial builder function. |
| class minPoly | ||
| Definition | df-minply 33877* | Define the minimal polynomial builder function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ minPoly = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑒) ↦ ((idlGen1p‘(𝑒 ↾s 𝑓))‘{𝑝 ∈ dom (𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓) ∣ (((𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓)‘𝑝)‘𝑥) = (0g‘𝑒)}))) | ||
| Theorem | ply1annidllem 33878* | Write the set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 as the kernel of the ring homomorphism 𝐹 mapping polynomials 𝑝 to their subring evaluation at a given point 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑃) ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })) | ||
| Theorem | ply1annidl 33879* | The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 forms an ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ply1annnr 33880* | The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is not the whole polynomial ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | ply1annig1p 33881* | The ideal 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is generated by the ideal's canonical generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } & ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (𝐾‘{(𝐺‘𝑄)})) | ||
| Theorem | minplyval 33882* | Expand the value of the minimal polynomial (𝑀‘𝐴) for a given element 𝐴. It is defined as the unique monic polynomial of minimal degree which annihilates 𝐴. By ply1annig1p 33881, that polynomial generates the ideal of the annihilators of 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } & ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | minplycl 33883* | The minimal polynomial is a polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } & ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Base‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ply1annprmidl 33884* | The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is a prime ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 } ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | minplymindeg 33885 | The minimal polynomial of 𝐴 is minimal among the nonzero annihilators of 𝐴 with regard to degree. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ≤ (𝐷‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | minplyann 33886 | The minimal polynomial for 𝐴 annihilates 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘(𝑀‘𝐴))‘𝐴) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | minplyirredlem 33887 | Lemma for minplyirred 33888. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Base‘𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Base‘𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(.r‘𝑃)𝐻) = (𝑀‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = (0g‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Unit‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | minplyirred 33888 | A nonzero minimal polynomial is irreducible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Irred‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | irngnminplynz 33889 | Integral elements have nonzero minimal polynomials. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | minplym1p 33890 | A minimal polynomial is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | minplynzm1p 33891 | If a minimal polynomial is nonzero, then it is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | minplyelirng 33892 | If the minimial polynomial 𝐹 of an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 has nonnegative degree, then 𝑋 is integral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑅 minPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | irredminply 33893 | An irreducible, monic, annihilating polynomial is the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Irred‘𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem1 33894 | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem2 33895* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. Both the ring of polynomials 𝑃 and the field 𝐿 generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴 can be considered as modules over the elements of 𝐹. Then, the evaluation map 𝐺, mapping polynomials to their evaluation at 𝐴, is a module homomorphism between those modules. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃 LMHom ((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem3 33896* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. The quotient 𝑃 / 𝑍 of the vector space 𝑃 of polynomials by the subspace 𝑍 of polynomials annihilating 𝐴 is itself a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem4 33897* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. By lmhmqusker 33509, the surjective module homomorphism 𝐺 described in algextdeglem2 33895 induces an isomorphism with the quotient space. Therefore, the dimension of that quotient space 𝑃 / 𝑍 is the degree of the algebraic field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (𝐿[:]𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem5 33898* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. The subspace 𝑍 of annihilators of 𝐴 is a principal ideal generated by the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{(𝑀‘𝐴)})) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem6 33899* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. By r1pquslmic 33703, the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is isomorphic with the quotient ring 𝑄. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem7 33900* | Lemma for algextdeg 33902. The polynomials 𝑋 of lower degree than the minimal polynomial are left unchanged when taking the remainder of the division by that minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝑋)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |