P. 339 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33801-33900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	extdggt0 33801	Degrees of field extension are greater than zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 0 < (𝐸[:]𝐹))
Theorem	fldexttr 33802	Field extension is a transitive relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → 𝐸/FldExt𝐾)
Theorem	fldextid 33803	The field extension relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹/FldExt𝐹)
Theorem	extdgid 33804	A trivial field extension has degree one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 ∈ Field → (𝐸[:]𝐸) = 1)
Theorem	fldsdrgfldext 33805	A sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹/FldExt𝐺)
Theorem	fldsdrgfldext2 33806	A sub-sub-division-ring of a field forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺/FldExt𝐻)
Theorem	extdgmul 33807	The multiplicativity formula for degrees of field extensions. Given 𝐸 a field extension of 𝐹, itself a field extension of 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐾 is the product of the degrees of the extensions 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 and 𝐹/FldExt𝐾. Proposition 1.2 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸[:]𝐾) = ((𝐸[:]𝐹) ·e (𝐹[:]𝐾)))
Theorem	finextfldext 33808	A finite field extension is a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FinExt𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FldExt𝐹)
Theorem	finexttrb 33809	The extension 𝐸 of 𝐾 is finite if and only if 𝐸 is finite over 𝐹 and 𝐹 is finite over 𝐾. Corollary 1.3 of [Lang] , p. 225. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FldExt𝐾) → (𝐸/FinExt𝐾 ↔ (𝐸/FinExt𝐹 ∧ 𝐹/FinExt𝐾)))
Theorem	extdg1id 33810	If the degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1, then 𝐸 and 𝐹 are identical. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1) → 𝐸 = 𝐹)
Theorem	extdg1b 33811	The degree of the extension 𝐸/FldExt𝐹 is 1 iff 𝐸 and 𝐹 are the same structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → ((𝐸[:]𝐹) = 1 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐹))
Theorem	fldgenfldext 33812	A subfield 𝐹 extended with a set 𝐴 forms a field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿/FldExt𝐾)
Theorem	fldextchr 33813	The characteristic of a subfield is the same as the characteristic of the larger field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (chr‘𝐹) = (chr‘𝐸))
Theorem	evls1fldgencl 33814	Closure of the subring polynomial evaluation in the field extention. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))
Theorem	ccfldsrarelvec 33815	The subring algebra of the complex numbers over the real numbers is a left vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) ∈ LVec
Theorem	ccfldextdgrr 33816	The degree of the field extension of the complex numbers over the real numbers is 2. (Suggested by GL, 4-Aug-2023.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (ℂfld[:]ℝfld) = 2
Theorem	fldextrspunlsplem 33817*	Lemma for fldextrspunlsp 33818: First direction. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:𝐻⟶𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 finSupp (0g‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑓)(.r‘𝐿)𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝐺 ↑m 𝐵)(𝑎 finSupp (0g‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐿 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑏)(.r‘𝐿)𝑏)))))
Theorem	fldextrspunlsp 33818	Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33820. The subring generated by the union of two field extensions 𝐺 and 𝐻 is the vector sub- 𝐺 space generated by a basis 𝐵 of 𝐻. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (LBasis‘((subringAlg ‘𝐽)‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((LSpan‘((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐺))‘𝐵))
Theorem	fldextrspunlem1 33819	Lemma for fldextrspunfld 33820. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐺)) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldextrspunfld 33820	The ring generated by the union of two field extensions is a field. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)
Theorem	fldextrspunlem2 33821	Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RingSpan‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))
Theorem	fldextrspundgle 33822	Inequality involving the degree of two different field extensions 𝐼 and 𝐽 of a same field 𝐹. Part of the proof of Proposition 5, Chapter 5, of [BourbakiAlg2] p. 116. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ≤ (𝐽[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldextrspundglemul 33823	Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, 𝐽 / 𝐾 being finite, and the composiste field 𝐸 = 𝐼𝐽, the degree of the extension of the composite field 𝐸 / 𝐾 is at most the product of the field extension degrees of 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐾) ≤ ((𝐼[:]𝐾) ·e (𝐽[:]𝐾)))
Theorem	fldextrspundgdvdslem 33824	Lemma for fldextrspundgdvds 33825. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸[:]𝐼) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	fldextrspundgdvds 33825	Given two finite extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾 of the same field 𝐾, the degree of the extension 𝐼 / 𝐾 divides the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾, 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) ∥ (𝐸[:]𝐾))
Theorem	fldext2rspun 33826*	Given two field extensions 𝐼 / 𝐾 and 𝐽 / 𝐾, 𝐼 / 𝐾 being a quadratic extension, and the degree of 𝐽 / 𝐾 being a power of 2, the degree of the extension 𝐸 / 𝐾 is a power of 2 , 𝐸 being the composite field 𝐼𝐽. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐿 ↾s 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼[:]𝐾) = 2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐿 ↾s (𝐿 fldGen (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐸[:]𝐾) = (2↑𝑛))
21.3.11.1  Algebraic numbers
Syntax	cirng 33827	Integral subring of a ring.
class IntgRing
Definition	df-irng 33828*	Define the subring of elements of a ring 𝑟 integral over a subset 𝑠. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ IntgRing = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝑟 ↾s 𝑠))(◡((𝑟 evalSub1 𝑠)‘𝑓) “ {(0g‘𝑟)}))
Theorem	irngval 33829*	The elements of a field 𝑅 integral over a subset 𝑆. In the case of a subfield, those are the algebraic numbers over the field 𝑆 within the field 𝑅. That is, the numbers 𝑋 which are roots of monic polynomials 𝑃(𝑋) with coefficients in 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)(◡(𝑂‘𝑓) “ { 0 }))
Theorem	elirng 33830*	Property for an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 to be integral over a subring 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (Monic1p‘𝑈)((𝑂‘𝑓)‘𝑋) = 0 )))
Theorem	irngss 33831	All elements of a subring 𝑆 are integral over 𝑆. This is only true in the case of a nonzero ring, since there are no integral elements in a zero ring (see 0ringirng 33833). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆))
Theorem	irngssv 33832	An integral element is an element of the base set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	0ringirng 33833	A zero ring 𝑅 has no integral elements. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆) = ∅)
Theorem	irngnzply1lem 33834	In the case of a field 𝐸, a root 𝑋 of some nonzero polynomial 𝑃 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 is integral over 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ dom 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝑃)‘𝑋) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))
Theorem	irngnzply1 33835*	In the case of a field 𝐸, the roots of nonzero polynomials 𝑝 with coefficients in a subfield 𝐹 are exactly the integral elements over 𝐹. Roots of nonzero polynomials are called algebraic numbers, so this shows that in the case of a field, elements integral over 𝐹 are exactly the algebraic numbers. In this formula, dom 𝑂 represents the polynomials, and 𝑍 the zero polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹) = ∪ 𝑝 ∈ (dom 𝑂 ∖ {𝑍})(◡(𝑂‘𝑝) “ { 0 }))
Theorem	extdgfialglem1 33836*	Lemma for extdgfialg 33838. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ (0...𝐷) ↦ (𝑛(.g‘(mulGrp‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)))𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝐹 ↑m (0...𝐷))(𝑎 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ ((𝐸 Σg (𝑎 ∘f · 𝐺)) = 𝑍 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ((0...𝐷) × {𝑍}))))
Theorem	extdgfialglem2 33837*	Lemma for extdgfialg 33838. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ (0...𝐷) ↦ (𝑛(.g‘(mulGrp‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹)))𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:(0...𝐷)⟶𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 Σg (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐺)) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ((0...𝐷) × {𝑍}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))
Theorem	extdgfialg 33838	A finite field extension 𝐸 / 𝐹 is algebraic. Part of the proof of Proposition 1.1 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dim‘((subringAlg ‘𝐸)‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹) = 𝐵)
21.3.11.2  Algebraic extensions
Syntax	calgext 33839	Syntax for the algebraic field extension relation.
class /AlgExt
Definition	df-algext 33840*	Definition of the algebraic extension relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ /AlgExt = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ (𝑒/FldExt𝑓 ∧ (𝑒 IntgRing (Base‘𝑓)) = (Base‘𝑒))}
Theorem	bralgext 33841	Express the fact that a field extension 𝐸 / 𝐹 is algebraic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸/AlgExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐶) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	finextalg 33842	A finite field extension is algebraic. Proposition 1.1 of [Lang], p. 224. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/FinExt𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸/AlgExt𝐹)
21.3.11.3  Minimal polynomials
Syntax	cminply 33843	Extend class notation with the minimal polynomial builder function.
class minPoly
Definition	df-minply 33844*	Define the minimal polynomial builder function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ minPoly = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑒) ↦ ((idlGen1p‘(𝑒 ↾s 𝑓))‘{𝑝 ∈ dom (𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓) ∣ (((𝑒 evalSub1 𝑓)‘𝑝)‘𝑥) = (0g‘𝑒)})))
Theorem	ply1annidllem 33845*	Write the set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 as the kernel of the ring homomorphism 𝐹 mapping polynomials 𝑝 to their subring evaluation at a given point 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑃) ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 }))
Theorem	ply1annidl 33846*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 forms an ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑃))
Theorem	ply1annnr 33847*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is not the whole polynomial ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑈)
Theorem	ply1annig1p 33848*	The ideal 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is generated by the ideal's canonical generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (𝐾‘{(𝐺‘𝑄)}))
Theorem	minplyval 33849*	Expand the value of the minimal polynomial (𝑀‘𝐴) for a given element 𝐴. It is defined as the unique monic polynomial of minimal degree which annihilates 𝐴. By ply1annig1p 33848, that polynomial generates the ideal of the annihilators of 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝑄))
Theorem	minplycl 33850*	The minimal polynomial is a polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (idlGen1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Base‘𝑃))
Theorem	ply1annprmidl 33851*	The set 𝑄 of polynomials annihilating an element 𝐴 is a prime ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = {𝑞 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∣ ((𝑂‘𝑞)‘𝐴) = 0 }    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑃))
Theorem	minplymindeg 33852	The minimal polynomial of 𝐴 is minimal among the nonzero annihilators of 𝐴 with regard to degree. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ≤ (𝐷‘𝐻))
Theorem	minplyann 33853	The minimal polynomial for 𝐴 annihilates 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘(𝑀‘𝐴))‘𝐴) = 0 )
Theorem	minplyirredlem 33854	Lemma for minplyirred 33855. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Base‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Base‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(.r‘𝑃)𝐻) = (𝑀‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = (0g‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (Unit‘𝑃))
Theorem	minplyirred 33855	A nonzero minimal polynomial is irreducible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Irred‘𝑃))
Theorem	irngnminplynz 33856	Integral elements have nonzero minimal polynomials. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	minplym1p 33857	A minimal polynomial is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	minplynzm1p 33858	If a minimal polynomial is nonzero, then it is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	minplyelirng 33859	If the minimal polynomial 𝐹 of an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 has nonnegative degree, then 𝑋 is integral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑅 minPoly 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆))
Theorem	irredminply 33860	An irreducible, monic, annihilating polynomial is the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Irred‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	algextdeglem1 33861	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) = 𝐾)
Theorem	algextdeglem2 33862*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. Both the ring of polynomials 𝑃 and the field 𝐿 generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴 can be considered as modules over the elements of 𝐹. Then, the evaluation map 𝐺, mapping polynomials to their evaluation at 𝐴, is a module homomorphism between those modules. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃 LMHom ((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐹)))
Theorem	algextdeglem3 33863*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. The quotient 𝑃 / 𝑍 of the vector space 𝑃 of polynomials by the subspace 𝑍 of polynomials annihilating 𝐴 is itself a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ LVec)
Theorem	algextdeglem4 33864*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. By lmhmqusker 33477, the surjective module homomorphism 𝐺 described in algextdeglem2 33862 induces an isomorphism with the quotient space. Therefore, the dimension of that quotient space 𝑃 / 𝑍 is the degree of the algebraic field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (𝐿[:]𝐾))
Theorem	algextdeglem5 33865*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. The subspace 𝑍 of annihilators of 𝐴 is a principal ideal generated by the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{(𝑀‘𝐴)}))
Theorem	algextdeglem6 33866*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. By r1pquslmic 33671, the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is isomorphic with the quotient ring 𝑄. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃)))
Theorem	algextdeglem7 33867*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. The polynomials 𝑋 of lower degree than the minimal polynomial are left unchanged when taking the remainder of the division by that minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
Theorem	algextdeglem8 33868*	Lemma for algextdeg 33869. The dimension of the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is the degree of the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)})    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃)) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))
Theorem	algextdeg 33869	The degree of an algebraic field extension (noted [𝐿:𝐾]) is the degree of the minimal polynomial 𝑀(𝐴), whereas 𝐿 is the field generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴. Part of Proposition 1.4 of [Lang], p. 225. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))
21.3.11.4  Quadratic Field Extensions
Theorem	rtelextdg2lem 33870	Lemma for rtelextdg2 33871: If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then the degree of its field extension is at most 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋})))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 )    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (var1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ⊗ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (algSc‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((2 ∧ 𝑌) ⊕ (((𝑈‘𝐴) ⊗ 𝑌) ⊕ (𝑈‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) ≤ 2)
Theorem	rtelextdg2 33871	If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then it is either in the base field, or the degree of its field extension is exactly 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋})))    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∨ (𝐿[:]𝐾) = 2))
21.3.11.5  Towers of quadratic extentions
Theorem	fldext2chn 33872*	In a non-empty chain 𝑇 of quadratic field extensions, the degree of the final extension is always a power of two. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑒)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑓)    &   ⊢ < = {⟨𝑓, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( < Chain (SubDRing‘𝑊)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Field)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (𝑇‘0)) = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (lastS‘𝑇)) = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿/FldExt𝑄 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛)))
21.3.12  Constructible Numbers This section defines the set of constructible points as complex numbers which can be drawn starting from two points (we take 0 and 1), and taking intersections of circles and lines. This construction is useful for proving the impossibility of doubling the cube (2sqr3nconstr 33925), and of angle trisection (cos9thpinconstr 33935)
Syntax	cconstr 33873	Extend class notation with the set of constructible points.
class Constr
Definition	df-constr 33874*	Define the set of geometrically constructible points, by recursively adding the line-line, line-circle and circle-circle intersections constructions using points in a previous iteration. Definition 7.4. in [Stewart] p. 92. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 19-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Constr = ∪ (rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) “ ω)
Theorem	constrrtll 33875	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-line intersections are solutions of linear equations, and can therefore be completely constructed. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐶 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐶))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐴 + (((((𝐴 − 𝐶) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))) − (((∗‘𝐴) − (∗‘𝐶)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) / ((((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶)) − ((𝐵 − 𝐴) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))))) · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑁)
Theorem	constrrtlc1 33876	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation, non-degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (((((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶)) − (𝐶 · 𝑄)) / 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (-((𝐶 · (((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶))) + ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · ((∗‘𝐸) − (∗‘𝐹)))) / 𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 0))
Theorem	constrrtlc2 33877	In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are one of the original points, in a degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝐴)
Theorem	constrrtcclem 33878	In the construction of constructible numbers, circle-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation. Case of non-degenerate circles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶) · (∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · (∗‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (((𝑄 − ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 + 𝐴))) − (𝑃 − ((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 + 𝐴)))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = -(((((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑃 · 𝐷)) − (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑄 · 𝐴))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	constrrtcc 33879	In the construction of constructible numbers, circle-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶) · (∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · (∗‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (((𝑄 − ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 + 𝐴))) − (𝑃 − ((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 + 𝐴)))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = -(((((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑃 · 𝐷)) − (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑄 · 𝐴))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0)
Theorem	isconstr 33880*	Property of being a constructible number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Constr ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑚))
Theorem	constr0 33881	The first step of the construction of constructible numbers is the pair {0, 1}. In this theorem and the following, we use (𝐶‘𝑁) for the 𝑁-th intermediate iteration of the constructible number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶‘∅) = {0, 1}
Theorem	constrsuc 33882*	Membership in the successor step of the construction of constructible numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶‘𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ ∧ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑋 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑋 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓)))))))
Theorem	constrlim 33883*	Limit step of the construction of constructible numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Lim 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝐶‘𝑛))
Theorem	constrsscn 33884*	Closure of the constructible points in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ ℂ)
Theorem	constrsslem 33885*	Lemma for constrss 33887. This lemma requires the additional condition that 0 is a constructible number; that condition is removed in constrss 33887. (Proposed by Saveliy Skresanov, 23-JUn-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁))
Theorem	constr01 33886*	0 and 1 are in all steps of the construction of constructible points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {0, 1} ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑁))
Theorem	constrss 33887*	Constructed points are in the next generation constructed points. Lemma 7.3 of [Stewart] p. 91. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁))
Theorem	constrmon 33888*	The construction of constructible numbers is monotonous, i.e. if the ordinal 𝑀 is less than the ordinal 𝑁, which is denoted by 𝑀 ∈ 𝑁, then the 𝑀-th step of the constructible numbers is included in the 𝑁-th step. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑀) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑁))
Theorem	constrconj 33889*	If a point 𝑋 of the complex plane is constructible, so is its conjugate (∗‘𝑋). (Proposed by Saveliy Skresanov, 25-Jun-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∗‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))
Theorem	constrfin 33890*	Each step of the construction of constructible numbers is finite. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	constrelextdg2 33891*	If the 𝑁-th step (𝐶‘𝑁) of the construction of constuctible numbers is included in a subfield 𝐹 of the complex numbers, then any element 𝑋 of the next step (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) is either in 𝐹 or in a quadratic extension of 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld ↾s (ℂfld fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘ℂfld))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∨ (𝐿[:]𝐾) = 2))
Theorem	constrextdg2lem 33892*	Lemma for constrextdg2 33893. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓)    &   ⊢ < = {⟨𝑓, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( < Chain (SubDRing‘ℂfld)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘0) = ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ ( < Chain (SubDRing‘ℂfld))((𝑣‘0) = ℚ ∧ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑣)))
Theorem	constrextdg2 33893*	Any step (𝐶‘𝑁) of the construction of constructible numbers is contained in the last field of a tower of quadratic field extensions starting with ℚ. See Theorem 7.11 of [Stewart] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓)    &   ⊢ < = {⟨𝑓, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ ( < Chain (SubDRing‘ℂfld))((𝑣‘0) = ℚ ∧ (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑣)))
Theorem	constrext2chnlem 33894*	Lemma for constrext2chn 33903. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓)    &   ⊢ < = {⟨𝑓, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld ↾s (ℂfld fldGen (ℚ ∪ {𝐴})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛))
Theorem	constrfiss 33895*	For any finite set 𝐴 of constructible numbers, there is a 𝑛 -th step (𝐶‘𝑛) containing all numbers in 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ω 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑛))
Theorem	constrllcllem 33896*	Constructible numbers are closed under line-line intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐺 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐺))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐺))) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr)
Theorem	constrlccllem 33897*	Constructible numbers are closed under line-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐺)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr)
Theorem	constrcccllem 33898*	Constructible numbers are closed under circle-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr)
Theorem	constrcbvlem 33899*	Technical lemma for eliminating the hypothesis of constr0 33881 and co. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑜 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 = (𝑖 + (𝑜 · (𝑗 − 𝑖))) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑘 + (𝑝 · (𝑙 − 𝑘))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑗 − 𝑖)) · (𝑙 − 𝑘))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑜 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 = (𝑖 + (𝑜 · (𝑗 − 𝑖))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑘)) = (abs‘(𝑚 − 𝑞))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑙 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑖)) = (abs‘(𝑗 − 𝑘)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑙)) = (abs‘(𝑚 − 𝑞))))}), {0, 1}) = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1})
Theorem	constrllcl 33900	Constructible numbers are closed under line-line intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐺 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐺))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐺))) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr)