Theorem brcodir 6111

Description: Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brcodir	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝐴   𝑧,𝐵   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑉   𝑧,𝑊

Proof of Theorem brcodir

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brcog 5844	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵)))
2		vex 3455	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
3		brcnvg 5857	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
4	2, 3	mpan 703	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
5	4	anbi2d 642	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
6	5	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
7	6	exbidv 1954	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
8	1, 7	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451   class class class wbr 5103  ^◡ccnv 5650   ∘ ccom 5655

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660

This theorem is used by:  codir  6112