Theorem brcodir 6112

Description: Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brcodir	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝐴   𝑧,𝐵   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑉   𝑧,𝑊

Proof of Theorem brcodir

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brcog 5843	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵)))
2		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
3		brcnvg 5856	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
4	2, 3	mpan 703	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
5	4	anbi2d 642	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
6	5	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
7	6	exbidv 1953	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
8	1, 7	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450   class class class wbr 5102  ^◡ccnv 5649   ∘ ccom 5654

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659

This theorem is used by:  codir  6113