Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > brcodir | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
brcodir | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | brcog 5764 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵))) | |
2 | vex 3426 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
3 | brcnvg 5777 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | mpan 686 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) |
5 | 4 | anbi2d 628 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
6 | 5 | adantl 481 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
7 | 6 | exbidv 1925 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
8 | 1, 7 | bitrd 278 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∃wex 1783 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3422 class class class wbr 5070 ◡ccnv 5579 ∘ ccom 5584 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5225 ax-pr 5347 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-op 4565 df-br 5071 df-opab 5133 df-cnv 5588 df-co 5589 |
This theorem is referenced by: codir 6014 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |