Theorem intirr 6093

Description: Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
intirr	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem intirr

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4174	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∩ I ) = ( I ∩ 𝑅)
2	1	eqeq1i 2735	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅)
3		disj2 4423	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅ ↔ I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅))
4		reli 5791	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
5		ssrel 5747	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel I → ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
7	2, 3, 6	3bitri 297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
8		equcom 2018	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
9		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
10	9	ideq 5818	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		df-br 5110	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
12	8, 10, 11	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
13		opex 5426	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
14	13	biantrur 530	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
15		eldif 3926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
17		df-br 5110	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
18	16, 17	xchnxbir 333	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
19	12, 18	imbi12i 350	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
20	19	2albii 1820	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
21		breq2 5113	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
22	21	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
23	22	equsalvw 2004	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
24	23	albii 1819	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
25	7, 20, 24	3bitr2i 299	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3913   ∩ cin 3915   ⊆ wss 3916  ∅c0 4298  ⟨cop 4597   class class class wbr 5109   I cid 5534  Rel wrel 5645

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5389

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-in 3923  df-ss 3933  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-br 5110  df-opab 5172  df-id 5535  df-xp 5646  df-rel 5647

This theorem is referenced by:  hartogslem1  9501  hausdiag  23538