Theorem intirr 6118

Description: Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
intirr	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem intirr

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4161	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∩ I ) = ( I ∩ 𝑅)
2	1	eqeq1i 2766	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅)
3		disj2 4417	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅ ↔ I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅))
4		reli 5813	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
5		ssrel 5769	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel I → ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
7	2, 3, 6	3bitri 300	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
8		equcom 2046	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
9		vex 3457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
10	9	ideq 5838	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		df-br 5109	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
12	8, 10, 11	3bitr2i 302	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
13		opex 5445	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
14	13	biantrur 539	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
15		eldif 3914	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 281	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
17		df-br 5109	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
18	16, 17	xchnxbir 336	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
19	12, 18	imbi12i 353	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
20	19	2albii 1848	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
21		breq2 5112	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
22	21	notbid 321	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
23	22	equsalvw 2032	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
24	23	albii 1847	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
25	7, 20, 24	3bitr2i 302	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1566   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2141  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3901   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904  ∅c0 4285  ⟨cop 4594   class class class wbr 5108   I cid 5555  Rel wrel 5666

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668

This theorem is referenced by:  hartogslem1  9503  hausdiag  23781