Theorem intirr 6124

Description: Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
intirr	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem intirr

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4201	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∩ I ) = ( I ∩ 𝑅)
2	1	eqeq1i 2733	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅)
3		disj2 4458	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ∩ 𝑅) = ∅ ↔ I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅))
4		reli 5828	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
5		ssrel 5784	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel I → ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))))
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ( I ⊆ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
7	2, 3, 6	3bitri 297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
8		equcom 2014	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
9		vex 3475	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
10	9	ideq 5855	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		df-br 5149	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
12	8, 10, 11	3bitr2i 299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I )
13		opex 5466	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
14	13	biantrur 530	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
15		eldif 3957	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
17		df-br 5149	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
18	16, 17	xchnxbir 333	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅))
19	12, 18	imbi12i 350	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
20	19	2albii 1815	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (V ∖ 𝑅)))
21		breq2 5152	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
22	21	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
23	22	equsalvw 2000	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
24	23	albii 1814	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
25	7, 20, 24	3bitr2i 299	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1532   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  Vcvv 3471   ∖ cdif 3944   ∩ cin 3946   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4323  ⟨cop 4635   class class class wbr 5148   I cid 5575  Rel wrel 5683

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-id 5576  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685

This theorem is referenced by:  hartogslem1  9566  hausdiag  23562