P. 62 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6101-6200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	relimasn 6101*	The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	elrelimasn 6102	Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	elimasng1 6103	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5142 and to prove elimasn1 6104 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶))
Theorem	elimasn1 6104	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5142 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	elimasng 6105	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6103, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6103 to "elimasng".
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elimasn 6106	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6104, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6104 to "elimasn".
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elimasni 6107	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	args 6108*	Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6901 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	elinisegg 6109	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	eliniseg 6110	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	epin 6111	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	epini 6112	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴
Theorem	iniseg 6113*	An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵})
Theorem	inisegn0 6114	Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dffr3 6115*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅))
Theorem	dfse2 6116*	Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V)
Theorem	imass1 6117	Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imass2 6118	Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	ndmima 6119	The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅)
Theorem	relcnv 6120	A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
⊢ Rel ◡𝐴
Theorem	relbrcnvg 6121	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5891 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eliniseg2 6122	Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6110. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	relbrcnv 6123	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5891 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relco 6124	A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cotrg 6125*	Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6128 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6128. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2157. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotrgOLD 6126*	Obsolete version of cotrg 6125 as of 29-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6128. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotrgOLDOLD 6127*	Obsolete version of cotrg 6125 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6128. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotr 6128*	Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6125. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	idrefALT 6129*	Alternate proof of idref 7164 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cnvsym 6130*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2157. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	cnvsymOLD 6131*	Obsolete version of cnvsym 6130 as of 29-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	cnvsymOLDOLD 6132*	Obsolete version of cnvsym 6130 as of 23-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	intasym 6133*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref 6134*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6293. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref2 6135*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	intirr 6136*	Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	brcodir 6137*	Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	codir 6138*	Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	qfto 6139*	A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	xpidtr 6140	A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	trin2 6141	The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	poirr2 6142	A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	trinxp 6143	The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	soirri 6144	A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴
Theorem	sotri 6145	A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	son2lpi 6146	A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	sotri2 6147	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	sotri3 6148	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	poleloe 6149	Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	poltletr 6150	Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	somin1 6151	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴)
Theorem	somincom 6152	Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	somin2 6153	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵)
Theorem	soltmin 6154	Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	cnvopab 6155*	The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-12 2177. (Revised by SN, 7-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ◡{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	cnvopabOLD 6156*	Obsolete version of cnvopab 6155 as of 7-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ◡{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	mptcnv 6157*	The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	cnv0 6158	The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5294, ax-nul 5304, ax-pr 5430. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ◡∅ = ∅
Theorem	cnvi 6159	The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡ I = I
Theorem	cnvun 6160	The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvdif 6161	Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvin 6162	Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	rnun 6163	Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	rnin 6164	The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	rniun 6165	The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵
Theorem	rnuni 6166*	The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥
Theorem	imaundi 6167	Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaundir 6168	The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imadifssran 6169	Condition for the range of a relation to be the range of one its restrictions. (Contributed by AV, 4-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐴)) ⊆ ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) → ran 𝐹 = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	cnvimassrndm 6170	The preimage of a superset of the range of a class is the domain of the class. Generalization of cnvimarndm 6099 for subsets. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) = dom 𝐹)
Theorem	dminss 6171	An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising". (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐴))
Theorem	imainss 6172	An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	inimass 6173	The image of an intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	inimasn 6174	The intersection of the image of singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ {𝐶}) = ((𝐴 “ {𝐶}) ∩ (𝐵 “ {𝐶})))
Theorem	cnvxp 6175	The converse of a Cartesian product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xp0 6176	The Cartesian product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 × ∅) = ∅
Theorem	xpnz 6177	The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is nonempty. (Variation of a theorem contributed by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	xpeq0 6178	At least one member of an empty Cartesian product is empty. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
Theorem	xpdisj1 6179	Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpdisj2 6180	Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpsndisj 6181	Cartesian products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∩ (𝐶 × {𝐷})) = ∅)
Theorem	difxp 6182	Difference of Cartesian products, expressed in terms of a union of Cartesian products of differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) × 𝐷) ∪ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	difxp1 6183	Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	difxp2 6184	Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	djudisj 6185*	Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐶) ∩ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ({𝑦} × 𝐷)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpdifid 6186*	The set of distinct couples in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ I )
Theorem	resdisj 6187	A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	rnxp 6188	The range of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	dmxpss 6189	The domain of a Cartesian product is included in its first factor. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.)
⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	rnxpss 6190	The range of a Cartesian product is included in its second factor. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	rnxpid 6191	The range of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	ssxpb 6192	A Cartesian product subclass relationship is equivalent to the conjunction of the analogous relationships for the factors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷)))
Theorem	xp11 6193	The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is a one-to-one "function" of its two "arguments". In other words, two Cartesian products, at least one with nonempty factors, are equal if and only if their respective factors are equal. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	xpcan 6194	Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	xpcan2 6195	Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ssrnres 6196	Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product): the LHS expresses inclusion in the range of the restricted relation, while the RHS expresses equality with the range of the restricted and corestricted relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	rninxp 6197*	Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝐶𝑦)
Theorem	dminxp 6198*	Two ways to express totality of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (dom (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐶𝑦)
Theorem	imainrect 6199	Image by a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝐺 “ (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)) ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpima 6200	Direct image by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = if((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅, ∅, 𝐵)