| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 62 of 510) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31454) |
(31455-32977) |
(32978-50912) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | idrefALT 6101* | Alternate proof of idref 7137 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsym 6102* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2194. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | intasym 6103* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref 6104* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6266. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref2 6105* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | intirr 6106* | Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | brcodir 6107* | Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | codir 6108* | Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | qfto 6109* | A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | xpidtr 6110 | A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | trin2 6111 | The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | poirr2 6112 | A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | trinxp 6113 | The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | soirri 6114 | A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sotri 6115 | A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | son2lpi 6116 | A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sotri2 6117 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sotri3 6118 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | poleloe 6119 | Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | poltletr 6120 | Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | somin1 6121 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | somincom 6122 | Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | somin2 6123 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | soltmin 6124 | Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvopab 6125* | The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-12 2213. (Revised by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | mptcnv 6126* | The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvun 6127 | The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvdif 6128 | Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvin 6129 | Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnun 6130 | Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnin 6131 | The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-pr 5390 and ax-sep 5248. (Revised by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rninOLD 6132 | Obsolete version of rnin 6131 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rniun 6133 | The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnuni 6134* | The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | imaundi 6135 | Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaundir 6136 | The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimassrndm 6137 | The preimage of a superset of the range of a class is the domain of the class. Generalization of cnvimarndm 6073 for subsets. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) = dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dminss 6138 | An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising". (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imainss 6139 | An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | inimass 6140 | The image of an intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | inimasn 6141 | The intersection of the image of singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ {𝐶}) = ((𝐴 “ {𝐶}) ∩ (𝐵 “ {𝐶}))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvxp 6142 | The converse of a Cartesian product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-11 2194. (Revised by SN, 26-Aug-2026.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnvxpOLD 6143 | Obsolete version of cnvxp 6142 as of 26-Aug-2026. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | xp0OLD 6144 | Obsolete version of xp0 5747 as of 1-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 × ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | xpnz 6145 | The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is nonempty. (Variation of a theorem contributed by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpeq0 6146 | At least one member of an empty Cartesian product is empty. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | xpdisj1 6147 | Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpdisj2 6148 | Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 × 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpsndisj 6149 | Cartesian products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∩ (𝐶 × {𝐷})) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | difxp 6150 | Difference of Cartesian products, expressed in terms of a union of Cartesian products of differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) × 𝐷) ∪ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difxp1 6151 | Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difxp2 6152 | Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | djudisj 6153* | Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐶) ∩ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ({𝑦} × 𝐷)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpdifid 6154* | The set of distinct couples in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ I ) | ||
| Theorem | xpdifcnvepel 6155* | The set of couples in a Cartesian product, where the second is not an element of the first. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐵 ∖ 𝑥)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ ◡ E ) | ||
| Theorem | resdisj 6156 | A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rnxp 6157 | The range of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmxpss 6158 | The domain of a Cartesian product is included in its first factor. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnxpss 6159 | The range of a Cartesian product is included in its second factor. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnxpid 6160 | The range of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssxpb 6161 | A Cartesian product subclass relationship is equivalent to the conjunction of the analogous relationships for the factors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | xp11 6162 | The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is a one-to-one "function" of its two "arguments". In other words, two Cartesian products, at least one with nonempty factors, are equal if and only if their respective factors are equal. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | xpcan 6163 | Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpcan2 6164 | Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrnres 6165 | Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product): the LHS expresses inclusion in the range of the restricted relation, while the RHS expresses equality with the range of the restricted and corestricted relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rninxp 6166* | Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝐶𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dminxp 6167* | Two ways to express totality of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (dom (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐶𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | imainrect 6168 | Image by a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝐺 “ (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpima 6169 | Direct image by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = if((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅, ∅, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpima1 6170 | Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of empty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpima2 6171 | Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of nonempty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpimasn 6172 | Direct image of a singleton by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sossfld 6173 | The base set of a strict order is contained in the field of the relation, except possibly for one element (note that ∅ Or {𝐵}). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | sofld 6174 | The base set of a nonempty strict order is the same as the field of the relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv3 6175* | The set of all ordered pairs in a class is the same as the double converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfrel2 6176 | Alternate definition of relation. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ ◡◡𝑅 = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel4v 6177* | A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6931 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel4 6178* | A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6931 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv 6179 | The double converse of a class strips out all elements that are not ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv2 6180 | The double converse of a class equals its restriction to the universe. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ↾ V) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvss 6181 | The double converse of a class is a subclass. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvssOLD 6182 | Obsolete version of cnvcnvss 6181 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvrescnv 6183 | Two ways to express the corestriction of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ◡(◡𝑅 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑅 ∩ (V × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnveqb 6184 | Equality theorem for converse. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnveq0 6185 | A relation empty iff its converse is empty. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ◡𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel3 6186 | Alternate definition of relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ V) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | elid 6187* | Characterization of the elements of the identity relation. TODO: reorder theorems to move this theorem and dfrel3 6186 after elrid 6036. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | dmresv 6188 | The domain of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ V) = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnresv 6189 | The range of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ↾ V) = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dfrn4 6190 | Range defined in terms of image. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = (𝐴 “ V) | ||
| Theorem | imadifssran 6191 | Condition for the range of a class to be the range of one of its restrictions. (Contributed by AV, 4-Oct-2025.) Remove antecedent. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 10-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐴)) ⊆ ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) → ran 𝐹 = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imadifssranOLD 6192 | Obsolete version of imadifssran 6191 as of 10-Jul-2026. (Contributed by AV, 4-Oct-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐴)) ⊆ ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) → ran 𝐹 = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | csbrn 6193 | Distribute proper substitution through the range of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rescnvcnv 6194 | The restriction of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvres 6195 | The double converse of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡(𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imacnvcnv 6196 | The image of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmsnn0 6197 | The domain of a singleton is nonzero iff the singleton argument is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ dom {𝐴} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rnsnn0 6198 | The range of a singleton is nonzero iff the singleton argument is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ran {𝐴} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dmsn0 6199 | The domain of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom {∅} = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cnvsn0 6200 | The converse of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ◡{∅} = ∅ | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |