| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 62 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31060) |
(31061-32583) |
(32584-50374) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | poirr2 6101 | A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | trinxp 6102 | The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | soirri 6103 | A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sotri 6104 | A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | son2lpi 6105 | A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sotri2 6106 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sotri3 6107 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | poleloe 6108 | Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | poltletr 6109 | Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | somin1 6110 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | somincom 6111 | Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | somin2 6112 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | soltmin 6113 | Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvopab 6114* | The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2169, ax-12 2206. (Revised by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | mptcnv 6115* | The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvun 6116 | The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvdif 6117 | Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvin 6118 | Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnun 6119 | Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnin 6120 | The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-pr 5384 and ax-sep 5240. (Revised by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rninOLD 6121 | Obsolete version of rnin 6120 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rniun 6122 | The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnuni 6123* | The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | imaundi 6124 | Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaundir 6125 | The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imadifssran 6126 | Condition for the range of a relation to be the range of one its restrictions. (Contributed by AV, 4-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐴)) ⊆ ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) → ran 𝐹 = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimassrndm 6127 | The preimage of a superset of the range of a class is the domain of the class. Generalization of cnvimarndm 6062 for subsets. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) = dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dminss 6128 | An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising". (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | imainss 6129 | An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | inimass 6130 | The image of an intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | inimasn 6131 | The intersection of the image of singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ {𝐶}) = ((𝐴 “ {𝐶}) ∩ (𝐵 “ {𝐶}))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvxp 6132 | The converse of a Cartesian product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | xp0OLD 6133 | Obsolete version of xp0 5740 as of 1-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 × ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | xpnz 6134 | The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is nonempty. (Variation of a theorem contributed by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpeq0 6135 | At least one member of an empty Cartesian product is empty. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | xpdisj1 6136 | Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpdisj2 6137 | Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 × 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpsndisj 6138 | Cartesian products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∩ (𝐶 × {𝐷})) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | difxp 6139 | Difference of Cartesian products, expressed in terms of a union of Cartesian products of differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) × 𝐷) ∪ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difxp1 6140 | Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | difxp2 6141 | Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | djudisj 6142* | Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐶) ∩ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ({𝑦} × 𝐷)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpdifid 6143* | The set of distinct couples in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ I ) | ||
| Theorem | resdisj 6144 | A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rnxp 6145 | The range of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmxpss 6146 | The domain of a Cartesian product is included in its first factor. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnxpss 6147 | The range of a Cartesian product is included in its second factor. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnxpid 6148 | The range of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ssxpb 6149 | A Cartesian product subclass relationship is equivalent to the conjunction of the analogous relationships for the factors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | xp11 6150 | The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is a one-to-one "function" of its two "arguments". In other words, two Cartesian products, at least one with nonempty factors, are equal if and only if their respective factors are equal. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | xpcan 6151 | Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpcan2 6152 | Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ssrnres 6153 | Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product): the LHS expresses inclusion in the range of the restricted relation, while the RHS expresses equality with the range of the restricted and corestricted relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rninxp 6154* | Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝐶𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dminxp 6155* | Two ways to express totality of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (dom (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐶𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | imainrect 6156 | Image by a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝐺 “ (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpima 6157 | Direct image by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = if((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅, ∅, 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpima1 6158 | Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of empty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xpima2 6159 | Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of nonempty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpimasn 6160 | Direct image of a singleton by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sossfld 6161 | The base set of a strict order is contained in the field of the relation, except possibly for one element (note that ∅ Or {𝐵}). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | sofld 6162 | The base set of a nonempty strict order is the same as the field of the relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv3 6163* | The set of all ordered pairs in a class is the same as the double converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfrel2 6164 | Alternate definition of relation. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ ◡◡𝑅 = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel4v 6165* | A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6914 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel4 6166* | A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6914 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv 6167 | The double converse of a class strips out all elements that are not ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnv2 6168 | The double converse of a class equals its restriction to the universe. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ↾ V) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvss 6169 | The double converse of a class is a subclass. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvssOLD 6170 | Obsolete version of cnvcnvss 6169 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvrescnv 6171 | Two ways to express the corestriction of a class. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ◡(◡𝑅 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑅 ∩ (V × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnveqb 6172 | Equality theorem for converse. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnveq0 6173 | A relation empty iff its converse is empty. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ◡𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrel3 6174 | Alternate definition of relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ V) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | elid 6175* | Characterization of the elements of the identity relation. TODO: reorder theorems to move this theorem and dfrel3 6174 after elrid 6025. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | dmresv 6176 | The domain of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ V) = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnresv 6177 | The range of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ↾ V) = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dfrn4 6178 | Range defined in terms of image. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = (𝐴 “ V) | ||
| Theorem | csbrn 6179 | Distribute proper substitution through the range of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rescnvcnv 6180 | The restriction of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvres 6181 | The double converse of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡(𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imacnvcnv 6182 | The image of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmsnn0 6183 | The domain of a singleton is nonzero iff the singleton argument is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ dom {𝐴} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rnsnn0 6184 | The range of a singleton is nonzero iff the singleton argument is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ran {𝐴} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dmsn0 6185 | The domain of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom {∅} = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cnvsn0 6186 | The converse of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ◡{∅} = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | dmsn0el 6187 | The domain of a singleton is empty if the singleton's argument contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 → dom {𝐴} = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | relsn2 6188 | A singleton is a relation iff it has a nonempty domain. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2013.) Make hypothesis an antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel {𝐴} ↔ dom {𝐴} ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmsnopg 6189 | The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the first member. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | dmsnopss 6190 | The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is a subset of the singleton of the first member (with no sethood assumptions on 𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} ⊆ {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | dmpropg 6191 | The domain of an unordered pair of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) → dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉} = {𝐴, 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | dmsnop 6192 | The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the first member. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | dmprop 6193 | The domain of an unordered pair of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉} = {𝐴, 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | dmtpop 6194 | The domain of an unordered triple of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉} = {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸} | ||
| Theorem | cnvcnvsn 6195 | Double converse of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Unlike cnvsn 6202, this does not need any sethood assumptions on 𝐴 and 𝐵.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ◡◡{〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = ◡{〈𝐵, 𝐴〉} | ||
| Theorem | dmsnsnsn 6196 | The domain of the singleton of the singleton of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ dom {{{𝐴}}} = {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | rnsnopg 6197 | The range of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the second member. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | rnpropg 6198 | The range of a pair of ordered pairs is the pair of second members. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ran {〈𝐴, 𝐶〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsng 6199 | Converse of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ◡{〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {〈𝐵, 𝐴〉}) | ||
| Theorem | rnsnop 6200 | The range of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the second member. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ran {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {𝐵} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |