Theorem dropab2 44447

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab2	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 4855	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	sps 2186	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2747	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex1 2446	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex2 2447	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2802	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 5187	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 5187	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2796	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779  {cab 2714  ⟨cop 4612  {copab 5186

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2377  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-opab 5187

This theorem is referenced by: (None)