Theorem dropab2 40770

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab2	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 4796	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	sps 2177	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2830	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex1 2457	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex2 2458	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2883	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 5120	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 5120	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2879	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1529   = wceq 1531  ∃wex 1774  {cab 2797  ⟨cop 4565  {copab 5119

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2170  ax-13 2384  ax-ext 2791

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1534  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2798  df-cleq 2812  df-clel 2891  df-nfc 2961  df-rab 3145  df-v 3495  df-dif 3937  df-un 3939  df-in 3941  df-ss 3950  df-nul 4290  df-if 4466  df-sn 4560  df-pr 4562  df-op 4566  df-opab 5120

This theorem is referenced by: (None)