Theorem dropab2 39178

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab2	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 4541	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	sps 2209	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2781	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 609	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex1 2477	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex2 2478	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2890	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 4848	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 4848	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2830	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 382  ∀wal 1629   = wceq 1631  ∃wex 1852  {cab 2757  ⟨cop 4323  {copab 4847

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1870  ax-4 1885  ax-5 1991  ax-6 2057  ax-7 2093  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2203  ax-13 2408  ax-ext 2751

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 829  df-3an 1073  df-tru 1634  df-ex 1853  df-nf 1858  df-sb 2050  df-clab 2758  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2767  df-nfc 2902  df-rab 3070  df-v 3353  df-dif 3727  df-un 3729  df-in 3731  df-ss 3738  df-nul 4065  df-if 4227  df-sn 4318  df-pr 4320  df-op 4324  df-opab 4848

This theorem is referenced by: (None)