Theorem dropab1 40198

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq1 4671	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	sps 2113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 620	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex2 2378	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex1 2377	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2837	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 4986	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 4986	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2833	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 387  ∀wal 1505   = wceq 1507  ∃wex 1742  {cab 2752  ⟨cop 4441  {copab 4985

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1758  ax-4 1772  ax-5 1869  ax-6 1928  ax-7 1965  ax-8 2052  ax-9 2059  ax-10 2079  ax-11 2093  ax-12 2106  ax-13 2301  ax-ext 2744

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 834  df-3an 1070  df-tru 1510  df-ex 1743  df-nf 1747  df-sb 2016  df-clab 2753  df-cleq 2765  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2912  df-rab 3091  df-v 3411  df-dif 3826  df-un 3828  df-in 3830  df-ss 3837  df-nul 4173  df-if 4345  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-op 4442  df-opab 4986

This theorem is referenced by: (None)