Theorem dropab1 41954

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq1 4801	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	sps 2180	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2749	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 629	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex2 2442	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex1 2441	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2808	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 5133	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 5133	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2804	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1783  {cab 2715  ⟨cop 4564  {copab 5132

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-13 2372  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-opab 5133

This theorem is referenced by: (None)