Theorem dropab1 43884

Description: Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dropab1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Proof of Theorem dropab1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq1 4874	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	sps 2174	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
3	2	eqeq2d 2739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩))
4	3	anbi1d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	drex2 2437	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	drex1 2436	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	abbidv 2797	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)})
8		df-opab 5211	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 5211	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2793	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1532   = wceq 1534  ∃wex 1774  {cab 2705  ⟨cop 4635  {copab 5210

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-13 2367  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-opab 5211

This theorem is referenced by: (None)