| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 432 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31525) |
(31526-33048) |
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | hlhillvec 43101 | The final constructed Hilbert space is a vector space. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | hlhildrng 43102 | The star division ring for the final constructed Hilbert space is a division ring. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilsrnglem 43103 | Lemma for hlhilsrng 43104. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((HGMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilsrng 43104 | The star division ring for the final constructed Hilbert space is a division ring. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | hlhil0 43105 | The zero vector for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 = (0g‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhillsm 43106 | The vector sum operation for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilocv 43107 | The orthocomplement for the final constructed Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((ocH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (ocv‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂‘𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | hlhillcs 43108 | The closed subspaces of the final constructed Hilbert space. TODO: hlhilbase 43086 is applied over and over to conclusion rather than applied once to antecedent - would compressed proof be shorter if applied once to antecedent? (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClSubSp‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ran 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilphllem 43109* | Lemma for hlhil 25769. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐿) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) & ⊢ , = (·𝑖‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐽 = ((HDMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((HGMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐽‘𝑦)‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ PreHil) | ||
| Theorem | hlhilhillem 43110* | Lemma for hlhil 25769. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐿) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐿) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿) & ⊢ , = (·𝑖‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐽 = ((HDMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((HGMap‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝐽‘𝑦)‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (ocv‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClSubSp‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Hil) | ||
| Theorem | hlathil 43111 |
Construction of a Hilbert space (df-hil 22015) 𝑈 from a Hilbert
lattice (df-hlat 40501) 𝐾, where 𝑊 is a fixed but arbitrary
hyperplane (co-atom) in 𝐾.
The Hilbert space 𝑈 is identical to the vector space ((DVecH‘𝐾)‘𝑊) (see dvhlvec 42259) except that it is extended with involution and inner product components. The construction of these two components is provided by Theorem 3.6 in [Holland95] p. 13, whose proof we follow loosely. An example of involution is the complex conjugate when the division ring is the field of complex numbers. The nature of the division ring we constructed is indeterminate, however, until we specialize the initial Hilbert lattice with additional conditions found by Maria Solèr in 1995 and refined by René Mayet in 1998 that result in a division ring isomorphic to ℂ. See additional discussion at https://us.metamath.org/qlegif/mmql.html#what 42259. 𝑊 corresponds to the w in the proof of Theorem 13.4 of [Crawley] p. 111. Such a 𝑊 always exists since HL has lattice rank of at least 4 by df-hil 22015. It can be eliminated if we just want to show the existence of a Hilbert space, as is done in the literature. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((HLHil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Hil) | ||
| Syntax | ccsrg 43112 | Extend class notation with the class of all commutative semirings. |
| class CSRing | ||
| Definition | df-csring 43113 | Define the class of all commutative semirings. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ CSRing = {𝑓 ∈ SRing ∣ (mulGrp‘𝑓) ∈ CMnd} | ||
| Theorem | iscsrg 43114 | A commutative semiring is a semiring whose multiplication is a commutative monoid. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CSRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ SRing ∧ 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)) | ||
| Theorem | rhmzrhval 43115 | Evaluation of integers across a ring homomorphism. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℤRHom‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (ℤRHom‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝑀‘𝑋)) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | zndvdchrrhm 43116* | Construction of a ring homomorphism from ℤ/nℤ to 𝑅 when the characteristic of 𝑅 divides 𝑁. (Contributed by metakunt, 4-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (chr‘𝑅) ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (chr‘𝑅) ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑍) ↦ ∪ ((ℤRHom‘𝑅) “ 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍 RingHom 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relogbcld 43117 | Closure of the general logarithm with a positive real base on positive reals, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | relogbexpd 43118 | Identity law for general logarithm: the logarithm of a power to the base is the exponent, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | relogbzexpd 43119 | Power law for the general logarithm for integer powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of an integer is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑁)) = (𝑁 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | logblebd 43120 | The general logarithm is monotone/increasing, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ≤ (𝐵 logb 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | uzindd 43121* | Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the following two are the basis and the induction step, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 8-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘)) → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | fzadd2d 43122 | Membership of a sum in a finite interval of integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑂...𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = (𝑀 + 𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (𝑁 + 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 + 𝐾) ∈ (𝑄...𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | fzne2d 43123 | Elementhood in a finite set of sequential integers, except its upper bound. (Contributed by metakunt, 23-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv2d2 43124* | Equality of functions is determined by their values, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplitnd 43125 | Split a finite interval of integers into two parts. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝐾 − 1)) ∪ (𝐾...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplitnr 43126 | Split a finite interval of integers into two parts. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝐾 − 1)) ∪ (𝐾...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | addassnni 43127 | Associative law for addition. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcomnni 43128 | Commutative law for addition. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mulassnni 43129 | Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mulcomnni 43130 | Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gcdcomnni 43131 | Commutative law for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | gcdnegnni 43132 | Negation invariance for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | neggcdnni 43133 | Negation invariance for gcd. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ( -𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | bccl2d 43134 | Closure of the binomial coefficient, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝐾) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | recbothd 43135 | Take reciprocal on both sides. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝐵) = (𝐶 / 𝐷) ↔ (𝐵 / 𝐴) = (𝐷 / 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdmultiplei 43136 | The GCD of a multiple of a positive integer is the positive integer itself. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀 | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddmzz2nni 43137 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | gcdaddmzz2nncomi 43138 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd ((𝐾 · 𝑀) + 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | gcdnncli 43139 | Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | muldvds1d 43140 | If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | muldvds2d 43141 | If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | nndivdvdsd 43142 | A positive integer divides a natural number if and only if the quotient is a positive integer, a deduction version of nndivdvds 16436. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | nnproddivdvdsd 43143 | A product of natural numbers divides a natural number if and only if a factor divides the quotient, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑁 / 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | coprmdvds2d 43144 | If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | imadomfi 43145 | An image of a function under a finite set is dominated by the set. (Contributed by SN, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ Fun 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 12gcd5e1 43146 | The gcd of 12 and 5 is 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;12 gcd 5) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | 60gcd6e6 43147 | The gcd of 60 and 6 is 6. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 gcd 6) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | 60gcd7e1 43148 | The gcd of 60 and 7 is 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 gcd 7) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | 420gcd8e4 43149 | The gcd of 420 and 8 is 4. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;;420 gcd 8) = 4 | ||
| Theorem | lcmeprodgcdi 43150 | Calculate the least common multiple of two natural numbers. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 & ⊢ (𝐺 · 𝐻) = 𝐴 & ⊢ (𝑀 · 𝑁) = 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | 12lcm5e60 43151 | The lcm of 12 and 5 is 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;12 lcm 5) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | 60lcm6e60 43152 | The lcm of 60 and 6 is 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 lcm 6) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | 60lcm7e420 43153 | The lcm of 60 and 7 is 420. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;60 lcm 7) = ;;420 | ||
| Theorem | 420lcm8e840 43154 | The lcm of 420 and 8 is 840. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (;;420 lcm 8) = ;;840 | ||
| Theorem | lcmfunnnd 43155 | Useful equation to calculate the least common multiple of 1 to n. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lcm‘(1...𝑁)) = ((lcm‘(1...(𝑁 − 1))) lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcm1un 43156 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 1 equals 1. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...1)) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | lcm2un 43157 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 2 equals 2. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...2)) = 2 | ||
| Theorem | lcm3un 43158 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 3 equals 6. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...3)) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | lcm4un 43159 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 4 equals 12. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...4)) = ;12 | ||
| Theorem | lcm5un 43160 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 5 equals 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...5)) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | lcm6un 43161 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 6 equals 60. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...6)) = ;60 | ||
| Theorem | lcm7un 43162 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 7 equals 420. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...7)) = ;;420 | ||
| Theorem | lcm8un 43163 | Least common multiple of natural numbers up to 8 equals 840. (Contributed by metakunt, 25-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (lcm‘(1...8)) = ;;840 | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint1 43164* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint2 43165* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐺 · (𝐹 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint3 43166* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ∫𝐴(𝐺 · (𝐹 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · ∫𝐴(𝐹 · 𝐻) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint4 43167* | Move constants out of integrals or sums and/or commute sum and integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐻 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹 · (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = ∫𝐴(𝐹 · Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | 3factsumint 43168* | Helpful equation for lcm inequality proof. (Contributed by metakunt, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐿[,]𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐹) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐴–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴(𝐹 · Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · 𝐻)) d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐺 · ∫𝐴(𝐹 · 𝐻) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | resopunitintvd 43169 | Restrict continuous function on open unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ ((0(,)1)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | resclunitintvd 43170 | Restrict continuous function on closed unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ ((0[,]1)–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | resdvopclptsd 43171* | Restrict derivative on unit interval. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ (0[,]1) ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem1 43172* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))((( -1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · (𝑥↑𝑘))) d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem2 43173* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))((( -1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · (𝑥↑𝑘)) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem3 43174* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 30-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))((( -1↑𝑘) · ((𝑁 − 𝑀)C𝑘)) · (1 / (𝑀 + 𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem4 43175 | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. F is found in lcmineqlem6 43177. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑀))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) / (𝑀 + 𝐾)) ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem5 43176 | Technical lemma for reciprocal multiplication in deduction form. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · (1 / 𝐶))) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 / 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem6 43177* | Part of lcm inequality lemma, this part eventually shows that F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is an integer. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) · 𝐹) ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem7 43178 | Derivative of 1-x for chain rule application. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (1 − 𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ -1) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem8 43179* | Derivative of (1-x)^(N-M). (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀)))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ( -(𝑁 − 𝑀) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑((𝑁 − 𝑀) − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem9 43180* | (1-x)^(N-M) is continuous. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem10 43181* | Induction step of lcmineqlem13 43184 (deduction form). (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑((𝑀 + 1) − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − (𝑀 + 1)))) d𝑥 = ((𝑀 / (𝑁 − 𝑀)) · ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem11 43182 | Induction step, continuation for binomial coefficients. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / ((𝑀 + 1) · (𝑁C(𝑀 + 1)))) = ((𝑀 / (𝑁 − 𝑀)) · (1 / (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem12 43183* | Base case for induction. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(0[,]1)((𝑡↑(1 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑡)↑(𝑁 − 1))) d𝑡 = (1 / (1 · (𝑁C1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem13 43184* | Induction proof for lcm integral. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (1 / (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem14 43185 | Technical lemma for inequality estimate. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∥ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) ∥ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem15 43186* | F times the least common multiple of 1 to n is a natural number. (Contributed by metakunt, 10-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ∫(0[,]1)((𝑥↑(𝑀 − 1)) · ((1 − 𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))) d𝑥 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lcm‘(1...𝑁)) · 𝐹) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem16 43187 | Technical divisibility lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · (𝑁C𝑀)) ∥ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem17 43188 | Inequality of 2^{2n}. (Contributed by metakunt, 29-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑(2 · 𝑁)) ≤ (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem18 43189 | Technical lemma to shift factors in binomial coefficient. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 + 1) · (((2 · 𝑁) + 1)C(𝑁 + 1))) = (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem19 43190 | Dividing implies inequality for lcm inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 · ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) · ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁)) ∥ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem20 43191 | Inequality for lcm lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 · (2↑(2 · 𝑁))) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem21 43192 | The lcm inequality lemma without base cases 7 and 8. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 4 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 2)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem22 43193 | The lcm inequality lemma without base cases 7 and 8. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 4 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 1))) ∧ (2↑((2 · 𝑁) + 2)) ≤ (lcm‘(1...((2 · 𝑁) + 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem23 43194 | Penultimate step to the lcm inequality lemma. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 9 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑𝑁) ≤ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmineqlem 43195 | The least common multiple inequality lemma, a central result for future use. Theorem 3.1 from https://www3.nd.edu/%7eandyp/notes/AKS.pdf (Contributed by metakunt, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 7 ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑𝑁) ≤ (lcm‘(1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | 3exp7 43196 | 3 to the power of 7 equals 2187. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (3↑7) = ;;;2187 | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq1 43197 | First inequality in inequality chain, proposed by Mario Carneiro (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ 9 < ((;11 / 7)↑5) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq2 43198 | Second inequality in inequality chain, proposed by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((;11 / 7)↑5) ≤ ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq4 43199 | Sharper logarithm inequality chain. (Contributed by metakunt, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 9 < ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lexlogpow5ineq3 43200 | Combined inequality chain for a specific power of the binary logarithm, proposed by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by metakunt, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 3 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 7 < ((2 logb 𝑋)↑5)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |