| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 432 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31004) |
(31005-32527) |
(32528-50292) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem5c 43101 | Part 2 of Equation 2 of https://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/notes/numberfield/fermatn4.html. (Contributed by SN, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (2 · (𝑅 · 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem5d 43102 | Part 3 of Equation 2 of https://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/notes/numberfield/fermatn4.html. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = ((𝑅↑2) + (𝑆↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem5e 43103 | Satisfy the hypotheses of flt4lem4 43096. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 gcd 𝑆) = 1 ∧ (𝑅 gcd 𝑀) = 1 ∧ (𝑆 gcd 𝑀) = 1) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝑀 · (𝑅 · 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 / 2)↑2) ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ))) | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem5f 43104 | Final equation of https://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/notes/numberfield/fermatn4.html. Given 𝐴↑4 + 𝐵↑4 = 𝐶↑2, provide a smaller solution. This satisfies the infinite descent condition. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) + (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (((√‘(𝐶 + (𝐵↑2))) − (√‘(𝐶 − (𝐵↑2)))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) + (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (((√‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) − (√‘(𝑀 − 𝑁))) / 2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑2) = (((𝑅 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑4) + ((𝑆 gcd (𝐵 / 2))↑4))) | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem6 43105 | Remove shared factors in a solution to 𝐴↑4 + 𝐵↑4 = 𝐶↑2. (Contributed by SN, 24-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐶 / ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑2)) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑4) + ((𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑4)) = ((𝐶 / ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑2))↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | flt4lem7 43106* | Convert flt4lem5f 43104 into a convenient form for nna4b4nsq 43107. TODO-SN: The change to (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 points at some inefficiency in the lemmas. (Contributed by SN, 25-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) = (𝐶↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑙 ∈ ℕ (∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ (¬ 2 ∥ 𝑔 ∧ ((𝑔 gcd ℎ) = 1 ∧ ((𝑔↑4) + (ℎ↑4)) = (𝑙↑2))) ∧ 𝑙 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | nna4b4nsq 43107 | Strengthening of Fermat's last theorem for exponent 4, where the sum is only assumed to be a square. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑4) + (𝐵↑4)) ≠ (𝐶↑2)) | ||
| Theorem | fltltc 43108 | (𝐶↑𝑁) is the largest term and therefore 𝐵 < 𝐶. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fltnltalem 43109 | Lemma for fltnlta 43110. A lower bound for 𝐴 based on pwdif 15824. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) + ((𝑁 − 1) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 1))))) < (𝐴↑𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | fltnlta 43110 | In a Fermat counterexample, the exponent 𝑁 is less than all three numbers (𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶). Note that 𝐴 < 𝐵 (hypothesis) and 𝐵 < 𝐶 (fltltc 43108). See https://youtu.be/EymVXkPWxyc 43108 for an outline. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝐴) | ||
These theorems were added for illustration or pedagogical purposes without the intention of being used, but some may still be moved to main and used, of course. | ||
| Theorem | iddii 43111 | Version of a1ii 2 with the hypotheses switched. The first hypothesis is redundant so this theorem should not normally appear in a proof. Inference associated with idd 24. (Contributed by SN, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | bicomdALT 43112 | Alternate proof of bicomd 223 which is shorter after expanding all parent theorems (as of 8-Aug-2024, bicom 222 depends on bicom1 221 and sylib 218 depends on syl 17). Additionally, the labels bicom1 221 and syl 17 happen to contain fewer characters than bicom 222 and sylib 218. However, neither of these conditions count as a shortening according to conventions 30485. In the first case, the criteria could easily be broken by upstream changes, and in many cases the upstream dependency tree is nontrivial (see orass 922 and pm2.31 923). For the latter case, theorem labels are up to revision, so they are not counted in the size of a proof. (Contributed by SN, 21-May-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | alan 43113 | Alias for 19.26 1872 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | exor 43114 | Alias for 19.43 1884 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rexor 43115 | Alias for r19.43 3106 for easier lookup. (Contributed by SN, 5-Jul-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ruvALT 43116 | Alternate proof of ruv 9513 with one fewer syntax step thanks to using elirrv 9505 instead of elirr 9507. However, it does not change the compressed proof size or the number of symbols in the generated display, so it is not considered a shortening according to conventions 30485. (Contributed by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V | ||
| Theorem | sn-wcdeq 43117 | Alternative to wcdeq 3710 and df-cdeq 3711. This flattens the syntax representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( sn-wcdeq vx vy wph ), illustrating the comment of df-cdeq 3711. (Contributed by SN, 26-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| wff (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sq45 43118 | 45 squared is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ (;45↑2) = ;;;2025 | ||
| Theorem | sum9cubes 43119 | The sum of the first nine perfect cubes is 2025. (Contributed by SN, 30-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...9)(𝑘↑3) = ;;;2025 | ||
| Theorem | sn-isghm 43120* | Longer proof of isghm 19181, unsuccessfully attempting to simplify isghm 19181 using elovmpo 7605 according to an editorial note (now removed). (Contributed by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 GrpHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Grp) ∧ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘(𝑢 + 𝑣)) = ((𝐹‘𝑢) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑣))))) | ||
| Theorem | aprilfools2025 43121 | An abuse of notation. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ {〈“𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑙”〉, 〈“𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠!”〉} ∈ V | ||
It is known that ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, and ax-12 2185 are logically redundant in a weak sense. Practically, they can be replaced with hbn1w 2050, alcomimw 2045, and ax12wlem 2138 as long as you can fully substitute 𝑦 for 𝑥 in the relevant wff (that is, 𝑥 cannot appear in the wff after substituting). This strategy (which I will call a "standard replacement" of axioms) has a lot of potential, for example it works with df-fv 6500 and df-mpt 5168, two very common constructions. But doing a standard replacement of ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, and ax-12 2185 takes unsatisfyingly long. Usually, if another approach is found, that approach is shorter and better. | ||
| Theorem | nfa1w 43122* | Replace ax-10 2147 in nfa1 2157 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 2-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | eu6w 43123* | Replace ax-10 2147, ax-12 2185 in eu6 2575 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | abbibw 43124* | Replace ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185 in abbib 2806 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | absnw 43125* | Replace ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185 in absn 4588 with a substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | euabsn2w 43126* | Replace ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185 in euabsn2 4670 with substitution hypotheses. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | cu3addd 43127 | Cube of sum of three numbers. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶)↑3) = (((((𝐴↑3) + (3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐵))) + ((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑2))) + (𝐵↑3))) + (((3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐶)) + (((3 · 2) · (𝐴 · 𝐵)) · 𝐶)) + (3 · ((𝐵↑2) · 𝐶)))) + (((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐶↑2))) + (3 · (𝐵 · (𝐶↑2)))) + (𝐶↑3)))) | ||
| Theorem | negexpidd 43128 | The sum of a real number to the power of N and the negative of the number to the power of N equals zero if N is a nonnegative odd integer. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (-𝐴↑𝑁)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | rexlimdv3d 43129* | An extended version of rexlimdvv 3194 to include three set variables. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem1 43130 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (((𝐴 + 1)↑2) − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem2 43131 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. Used to show that the denominators in 3cubeslem4 43135 are nonzero. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem3l 43132 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem3r 43133 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem3 43134 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3))) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubeslem4 43135 | Lemma for 3cubes 43136. This is Ryley's explicit formula for decomposing a rational 𝐴 into a sum of three rational cubes. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3) + ((((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)) + (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3))) | ||
| Theorem | 3cubes 43136* | Every rational number is a sum of three rational cubes. See S. Ryley, The Ladies' Diary 122 (1825), 35. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) + (𝑐↑3))) | ||
| Theorem | rntrclfvOAI 43137 | The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by OpenAI, 7-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | moxfr 43138* | Transfer at-most-one between related expressions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ ∃!𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | imaiinfv 43139* | Indexed intersection of an image. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elrfi 43140* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑣))) | ||
| Theorem | elrfirn 43141* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran 𝐹)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | elrfirn2 43142* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets (implicit). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐶))) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cmpfiiin 43143* | In a compact topology, a system of closed sets with nonempty finite intersections has a nonempty intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑙 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑙 ∈ Fin)) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑙 𝑆) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ismrcd1 43144* | Any function from the subsets of a set to itself, which is extensive (satisfies mrcssid 17574), isotone (satisfies mrcss 17573), and idempotent (satisfies mrcidm 17576) has a collection of fixed points which is a Moore collection, and itself is the closure operator for that collection. This can be taken as an alternate definition for the closure operators. This is the first half, ismrcd2 43145 is the second. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ∩ I ) ∈ (Moore‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ismrcd2 43145* | Second half of ismrcd1 43144. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (mrCls‘dom (𝐹 ∩ I ))) | ||
| Theorem | istopclsd 43146* | A closure function which satisfies sscls 23031, clsidm 23042, cls0 23055, and clsun 36526 defines a (unique) topology which it is the closure function on. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∪ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐵) ∧ (cls‘𝐽) = 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ismrc 43147* | A function is a Moore closure operator iff it satisfies mrcssid 17574, mrcss 17573, and mrcidm 17576. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mrCls “ (Moore‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))))) | ||
| Syntax | cnacs 43148 | Class of Noetherian closure systems. |
| class NoeACS | ||
| Definition | df-nacs 43149* | Define a closure system of Noetherian type (not standard terminology) as an algebraic system where all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ NoeACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (ACS‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘𝑔)}) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs 43150* | Expand definition of Noetherian-type closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | nacsfg 43151* | In a Noetherian-type closure system, all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs2 43152 | Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mrefg2 43153* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | mrefg3 43154* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | nacsacs 43155 | A closure system of Noetherian type is algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs3 43156* | A choice-free order equivalent to the Noetherian condition on a closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | incssnn0 43157* | Transitivity induction of subsets, lemma for nacsfix 43158. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nacsfix 43158* | An increasing sequence of closed sets in a Noetherian-type closure system eventually fixates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | constmap 43159 |
A constant (represented without dummy variables) is an element of a
function set.
Note: In the following development, we will be quite often quantifying over functions and points in N-dimensional space (which are equivalent to functions from an "index set"). Many of the following theorems exist to transfer standard facts about functions to elements of function sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mapco2g 43160 | Renaming indices in a tuple, with sethood as antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mapco2 43161 | Post-composition (renaming indices) of a mapping viewed as a point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons 43162 | Extending a one-based mapping by adding a tuple at the end results in another mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons1 43163 | Recover prefix mapping from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ↾ (1...𝑁)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons1cl 43164 | A nonempty mapping has a prefix. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀)) → (𝐴 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons2 43165 | Recover added element from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉})‘𝑀) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mptfcl 43166* | Interpret range of a maps-to notation as a constraint on the definition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Syntax | cmzpcl 43167 | Extend class notation to include pre-polynomial rings. |
| class mzPolyCld | ||
| Syntax | cmzp 43168 | Extend class notation to include polynomial rings. |
| class mzPoly | ||
| Definition | df-mzpcl 43169* | Define the polynomially closed function rings over an arbitrary index set 𝑣. The set (mzPolyCld‘𝑣) contains all sets of functions from (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) to ℤ which include all constants and projections and are closed under addition and multiplication. This is a "temporary" set used to define the polynomial function ring itself (mzPoly‘𝑣); see df-mzp 43170. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ mzPolyCld = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑣)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑣) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))}) | ||
| Definition | df-mzp 43170 | Polynomials over ℤ with an arbitrary index set, that is, the smallest ring of functions containing all constant functions and all projections. This is almost the most general reasonable definition; to reach full generality, we would need to be able to replace ZZ with an arbitrary (semi)ring (and a coordinate subring), but rings have not been defined yet. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ mzPoly = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑣)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpclval 43171* | Substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))}) | ||
| Theorem | elmzpcl 43172* | Double substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ↔ (𝑃 ⊆ (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑃) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃))))) | ||
| Theorem | mzpclall 43173 | The set of all functions with the signature of a polynomial is a polynomially closed set. This is a lemma to show that the intersection in df-mzp 43170 is well-defined. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcln0 43174 | Corollary of mzpclall 43173: polynomially closed function sets are not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl1 43175 | Defining property 1 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all constant functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐹}) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl2 43176* | Defining property 2 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all projections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝐹)) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl34 43177 | Defining properties 3 and 4 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it is closed under pointwise addition and multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpval 43178 | Value of the mzPoly function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) = ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | dmmzp 43179 | mzPoly is defined for all index sets which are sets. This is used with elfvdm 6868 to eliminate sethood antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ dom mzPoly = V | ||
| Theorem | mzpincl 43180 | Polynomial closedness is a universal first-order property and passes to intersections. This is where the closure properties of the polynomial ring itself are proved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpconst 43181 | Constant functions are polynomial. See also mzpconstmpt 43186. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐶}) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpf 43182 | A polynomial function is a function from the coordinate space to the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → 𝐹:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | mzpproj 43183* | A projection function is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑋)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpadd 43184 | The pointwise sum of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpaddmpt 43187. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f + 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmul 43185 | The pointwise product of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpmulmpt 43188. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpconstmpt 43186* | A constant function expressed in maps-to notation is polynomial. This theorem and the several that follow (mzpaddmpt 43187, mzpmulmpt 43188, mzpnegmpt 43190, mzpsubmpt 43189, mzpexpmpt 43191) can be used to build proofs that functions which are "manifestly polynomial", in the sense of being a maps-to containing constants, projections, and simple arithmetic operations, are actually polynomial functions. There is no mzpprojmpt because mzpproj 43183 is already expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpaddmpt 43187* | Sum of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpadd 43184. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmulmpt 43188* | Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 43188. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpsubmpt 43189* | The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpnegmpt 43190* | Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpexpmpt 43191* | Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpindd 43192* | "Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmfp 43193 | Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring) | ||
| Theorem | mzpsubst 43194* | Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzprename 43195* | Simplified version of mzpsubst 43194 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpresrename 43196* | A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcompact2lem 43197* | Lemma for mzpcompact2 43198. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎))))) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcompact2 43198* | Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎))))) | ||
| Theorem | coeq0i 43199 | coeq0 6214 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplit1nn0 43200 | Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |