Theorem rabexgf 46040

Description: A version of rabexg 5299 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabexgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabexgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rabexgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3414	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		simpl 488	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ss2abi 4014	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
4		rabexgf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
5	4	abid2f 2953	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
6	3, 5	sseqtri 3979	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴
7	1, 6	eqsstri 3977	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
8		ssexg 5281	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
9	7, 8	mpan 703	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  Ⅎwnfc 2908  {crab 3413  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916

This theorem is used by:  rabexf  46148  stoweidlem27  47036  stoweidlem35  47044