Theorem rabexgf 42567

Description: A version of rabexg 5255 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabexgf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabexgf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rabexgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 3073	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		simpl 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	ss2abi 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
4		rabexgf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
5	4	abid2f 2939	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
6	3, 5	sseqtri 3957	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴
7	1, 6	eqsstri 3955	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
8		ssexg 5247	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
9	7, 8	mpan 687	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2715  Ⅎwnfc 2887  {crab 3068  Vcvv 3432   ⊆ wss 3887

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904

This theorem is referenced by:  rabexf  42683  stoweidlem27  43568  stoweidlem35  43576