Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabsn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabsn | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eleq1 2826 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32ri 575 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
3 | 2 | baib 535 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
4 | 3 | alrimiv 1931 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
5 | rabeqsn 4599 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) | |
6 | 4, 5 | sylibr 233 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1537 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 {crab 3067 {csn 4558 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2156 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1784 df-nf 1788 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-rab 3072 df-sn 4559 |
This theorem is referenced by: unisn3 4859 sylow3lem6 19152 lineunray 34376 pmapat 37704 dia0 38993 nzss 41824 lco0 45656 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |