Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabsn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by AV, 26-Aug-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabsn | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eleq1 2877 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32ri 579 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
3 | 2 | baib 539 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
4 | 3 | alrimiv 1928 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) |
5 | rabeqsn 4566 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) | |
6 | 4, 5 | sylibr 237 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1536 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 {crab 3110 {csn 4525 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-rab 3115 df-sn 4526 |
This theorem is referenced by: unisn3 4821 sylow3lem6 18749 lineunray 33721 pmapat 37059 dia0 38348 nzss 41021 lco0 44836 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |