![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ssrmof | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: "At most one" existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
ssrexf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrmof | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssrexf.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | ssrexf.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | dfss2f 3972 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
4 | 3 | biimpi 215 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
5 | pm3.45 622 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
6 | 5 | alimi 1813 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | moim 2538 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3syl 18 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
9 | df-rmo 3376 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
10 | df-rmo 3376 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
11 | 8, 9, 10 | 3imtr4g 295 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∀wal 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 ∃*wmo 2532 Ⅎwnfc 2883 ∃*wrmo 3375 ⊆ wss 3948 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2703 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-tru 1544 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2534 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2724 df-clel 2810 df-nfc 2885 df-rmo 3376 df-v 3476 df-in 3955 df-ss 3965 |
This theorem is referenced by: 2sqreunnlem1 26949 2sqreunnlem2 26955 disjss1f 31798 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |