Theorem zfreg 9554

Description: The Axiom of Regularity using abbreviations. Axiom 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. This is called the "weak form". Axiom Reg of [BellMachover] p. 480. There is also a "strong form", not requiring that 𝐴 be a set, that can be proved with more difficulty (see zfregs 9697). (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfreg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem zfreg

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		n0 4307	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
2	1	biimpi 219	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3	2	anim2i 628	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		zfregcl 9552	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	imp 411	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
6		disj 4410	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
7	6	rexbii 3112	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	biimpri 231	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
9	3, 5, 8	3syl 19	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   ∩ cin 3904  ∅c0 4286

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-reg 9550

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-dif 3908  df-in 3912  df-nul 4287

This theorem is used by:  zfregfr  9569  en3lp  9579  inf3lem3  9595  tr0elw  37023  ttcwf2  37064  dfttc4  37069  elttcirr  37070  bj-restreg  37769  setindtr  43779