Theorem List for New Foundations Explorer - 3201-3300 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
Type | Label | Description |
Statement |
|
Theorem | cbvreucsf 3201 |
A more general version of cbvreuv 2838 that has no distinct variable
restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution.
(Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cbvrabcsf 3202 |
A more general version of cbvrab 2858 with no distinct variable
restrictions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cbvralv2 3203* |
Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal
quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier
domain. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cbvrexv2 3204* |
Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential
quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier
domain. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
|
|
2.1.10 Define boolean set
operations
|
|
Syntax | cnin 3205 |
Extend class notation to include anti-intersection (read: "the
anti-intersection of and ").
|
&ncap |
|
Syntax | ccompl 3206 |
Extend class notation to include complement. (read: "the complement of
" ).
|
∼ |
|
Syntax | cdif 3207 |
Extend class notation to include class difference (read: " minus
").
|
|
|
Syntax | cun 3208 |
Extend class notation to include union of two classes (read: "
union ").
|
|
|
Syntax | cin 3209 |
Extend class notation to include the intersection of two classes (read:
"
intersect ").
|
|
|
Syntax | csymdif 3210 |
Extend class notation to include the symmetric difference of two
classes.
|
|
|
Theorem | ninjust 3211* |
Soundness theorem for df-nin 3212. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Definition | df-nin 3212* |
Define the anti-intersection of two classes. This operation is used
implicitly after Axiom P1 of [Hailperin] p. 6, though there does not
seem to be any notation for it in the literature. (Contributed by SF,
10-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
|
|
Definition | df-compl 3213 |
Define the complement of a class. Compare nic-dfneg 1435. (Contributed by
SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼
&ncap |
|
Definition | df-in 3214 |
Define the intersection of two classes. See elin 3220
for membership.
(Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ &ncap |
|
Definition | df-un 3215 |
Define the union of two classes. See elun 3221 for membership. (Contributed
by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ &ncap ∼ |
|
Definition | df-dif 3216 |
Define the difference of two classes. See eldif 3222 for membership.
(Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ |
|
Definition | df-symdif 3217 |
Define the symmetric difference of two classes. Definition IX.9.10,
[Rosser] p. 238. (Contributed by SF,
10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | elning 3218 |
Membership in anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap |
|
Theorem | elcomplg 3219 |
Membership in class complement. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ |
|
Theorem | elin 3220 |
Membership in intersection. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | elun 3221 |
Membership in union. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | eldif 3222 |
Membership in difference. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfdif2 3223* |
Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Mar-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | elsymdif 3224 |
Membership in symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | elnin 3225 |
Membership in anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap |
|
Theorem | elcompl 3226 |
Membership in complement. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ |
|
Theorem | nincom 3227 |
Anti-intersection commutes. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | dblcompl 3228 |
Double complement law. (Contributed by SF, 10-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ ∼ |
|
Theorem | nfnin 3229 |
Hypothesis builder for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
2-Jan-2018.)
|
&ncap |
|
Theorem | nfcompl 3230 |
Hypothesis builder for complement. (Contributed by SF, 2-Jan-2018.)
|
∼ |
|
Theorem | nfin 3231 |
Hypothesis builder for intersection. (Contributed by SF,
2-Jan-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | nfun 3232 |
Hypothesis builder for union. (Contributed by SF, 2-Jan-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | nfdif 3233 |
Hypothesis builder for difference. (Contributed by SF, 2-Jan-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | nfsymdif 3234 |
Hypothesis builder for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
2-Jan-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | nineq1 3235 |
Equality law for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | nineq2 3236 |
Equality law for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | nineq12 3237 |
Equality law for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap |
|
Theorem | nineq1i 3238 |
Equality inference for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | nineq2i 3239 |
Equality inference for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | nineq12i 3240 |
Equality inference for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap
&ncap
|
|
Theorem | nineq1d 3241 |
Equality deduction for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap &ncap |
|
Theorem | nineq2d 3242 |
Equality deduction for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap &ncap |
|
Theorem | nineq12d 3243 |
Equality inference for anti-intersection. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
&ncap &ncap |
|
Theorem | compleq 3244 |
Equality law for complement. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ ∼
|
|
Theorem | compleqi 3245 |
Equality inference for complement. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
∼
∼ |
|
Theorem | compleqd 3246 |
Equality deduction for complement. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
∼ ∼ |
|
Theorem | difeq1 3247 |
Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | difeq2 3248 |
Equality theorem for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq1 3249 |
Equality law for intersection. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq2 3250 |
Equality law for intersection. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq12 3251 |
Equality law for intersection. (Contributed by SF, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq1i 3252 |
Equality inference for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq2i 3253 |
Equality inference for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq12i 3254 |
Equality inference for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq1d 3255 |
Equality deduction for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq2d 3256 |
Equality deduction for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | symdifeq12d 3257 |
Equality inference for symmetric difference. (Contributed by SF,
11-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
2.1.11 Subclasses and subsets
|
|
Syntax | wss 3258 |
Extend wff notation to include the subclass relation. This is
read " is a
subclass of "
or " includes
." When
exists as a
set, it is also read " is a subset of ."
|
|
|
Syntax | wpss 3259 |
Extend wff notation with proper subclass relation.
|
|
|
Definition | df-ss 3260 |
Define the subclass relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18.
For example,
1 , 2 1 , 2 , 3 (ex-ss in set.mm).
Note that (proved in ssid 3291). Contrast this relationship with
the relationship
(as will be defined
in df-pss 3262). For a more
traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3263.
Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3264, dfss4 3490, sspss 3369,
ssequn1 3434, ssequn2 3437, sseqin2 3475, and ssdif0 3610. (Contributed by NM,
27-Apr-1994.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfss 3261 |
Variant of subclass definition df-ss 3260. (Contributed by NM,
3-Sep-2004.)
|
|
|
Definition | df-pss 3262 |
Define proper subclass relationship between two classes. Definition 5.9
of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. For
example, 1 , 2
1 , 2 , 3
(ex-pss in
set.mm). Note that (proved in pssirr 3370).
Contrast this relationship with the relationship (as defined in
df-ss 3260). Other possible definitions are given by dfpss2 3355 and
dfpss3 3356. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfss2 3263* |
Alternate definition of the subclass relationship between two classes.
Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 17. (Contributed by NM,
8-Jan-2002.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfss3 3264* |
Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
14-Oct-1999.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfss2f 3265 |
Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses
instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfss3f 3266 |
Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses
instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM,
20-Mar-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | nfss 3267 |
If is not free in
and , it is not free in .
(Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssel 3268 |
Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssel2 3269 |
Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseli 3270 |
Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
5-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sselii 3271 |
Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
31-May-1999.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseldi 3272 |
Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
25-Jun-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseld 3273 |
Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-1995.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sselda 3274 |
Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
26-Jun-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseldd 3275 |
Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
14-Dec-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssneld 3276 |
If a class is not in another class, it is also not in a subclass of that
class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssneldd 3277 |
If an element is not in a class, it is also not in a subclass of that
class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssriv 3278* |
Inference rule based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM,
5-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssrdv 3279* |
Deduction rule based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-1995.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sstr2 3280 |
Transitivity of subclasses. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
14-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sstr 3281 |
Transitivity of subclasses. Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by
NM, 5-Sep-2003.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sstri 3282 |
Subclass transitivity inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sstrd 3283 |
Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | syl5ss 3284 |
Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | syl6ss 3285 |
Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim,
3-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sylan9ss 3286 |
A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sylan9ssr 3287 |
A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | eqss 3288 |
The subclass relationship is antisymmetric. Compare Theorem 4 of
[Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM,
5-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | eqssi 3289 |
Infer equality from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4 of
[Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM,
9-Sep-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | eqssd 3290 |
Equality deduction from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4
of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM,
27-Jun-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssid 3291 |
Any class is a subclass of itself. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssv 3292 |
Any class is a subclass of the universal class. (Contributed by NM,
31-Oct-1995.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq1 3293 |
Equality theorem for subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq2 3294 |
Equality theorem for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
25-Jun-1998.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq12 3295 |
Equality theorem for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM,
31-May-1999.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq1i 3296 |
An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by
NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq2i 3297 |
An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq12i 3298 |
An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by
NM, 31-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq1d 3299 |
An equality deduction for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sseq2d 3300 |
An equality deduction for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|
|