Theorem abbi 2345

Description: Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2225	. 2 |- ( { x | ph } = { x | ps } <-> A. y ( y e. { x | ph } <-> y e. { x | ps } ) )
2		nfsab1 2221	. . . 4 |- F/ x y e. { x | ph }
3		nfsab1 2221	. . . 4 |- F/ x y e. { x | ps }
4	2, 3	nfbi 1637	. . 3 |- F/ x ( y e. { x | ph } <-> y e. { x | ps } )
5		nfv 1576	. . 3 |- F/ y ( ph <-> ps )
6		df-clab 2218	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. { x | ph } <-> [ y / x ] ph )
7		sbequ12r 1820	. . . . 5 |- ( y = x -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ph ) )
8	6, 7	bitrid 192	. . . 4 |- ( y = x -> ( y e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) )
9		df-clab 2218	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. { x | ps } <-> [ y / x ] ps )
10		sbequ12r 1820	. . . . 5 |- ( y = x -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ps ) )
11	9, 10	bitrid 192	. . . 4 |- ( y = x -> ( y e. { x | ps } <-> ps ) )
12	8, 11	bibi12d 235	. . 3 |- ( y = x -> ( ( y e. { x | ph } <-> y e. { x | ps } ) <-> ( ph <-> ps ) ) )
13	4, 5, 12	cbval 1802	. 2 |- ( A. y ( y e. { x | ph } <-> y e. { x | ps } ) <-> A. x ( ph <-> ps ) )
14	1, 13	bitr2i 185	1 |- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )

Syntax hints:   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1395   = wceq 1397   [wsb 1810   e. wcel 2202   {cab 2217

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-11 1554  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224

This theorem is referenced by:  abbii  2347  abbid  2348  rabbi  2711  sbcbi2  3082  dfiota2  5287  iotabi  5296  uniabio  5297