HomeHome Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
Theorem List (p. 23 of 130)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2201-2300   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremsyl5eleq 2201 B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
 |-  A  e.  B   &    |-  ( ph  ->  B  =  C )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremsyl5eleqr 2202 B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
 |-  A  e.  B   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremsyl6eqel 2203 A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  B  e.  C   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremsyl6eqelr 2204 A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  B  =  A )   &    |-  B  e.  C   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremsyl6eleq 2205 A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  B )   &    |-  B  =  C   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremsyl6eleqr 2206 A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  B )   &    |-  C  =  B   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremeleq2s 2207 Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  -> 
 ph )   &    |-  C  =  B   =>    |-  ( A  e.  C  ->  ph )
 
Theoremeqneltrd 2208 If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  B  e.  C )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  A  e.  C )
 
Theoremeqneltrrd 2209 If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  A  e.  C )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  B  e.  C )
 
Theoremneleqtrd 2210 If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  -.  C  e.  A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  C  e.  B )
 
Theoremneleqtrrd 2211 If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  -.  C  e.  B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  C  e.  A )
 
Theoremcleqh 2212* Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqf 2277. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )   &    |-  ( y  e.  B  ->  A. x  y  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( A  =  B 
 <-> 
 A. x ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  B ) )
 
Theoremnelneq 2213 A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  -.  B  e.  C )  ->  -.  A  =  B )
 
Theoremnelneq2 2214 A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
 |-  ( ( A  e.  B  /\  -.  A  e.  C )  ->  -.  B  =  C )
 
Theoremeqsb3lem 2215* Lemma for eqsb3 2216. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
 |-  ( [ y  /  x ] x  =  A  <->  y  =  A )
 
Theoremeqsb3 2216* Substitution applied to an atomic wff (class version of equsb3 1898). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
 |-  ( [ y  /  x ] x  =  A  <->  y  =  A )
 
Theoremclelsb3 2217* Substitution applied to an atomic wff (class version of elsb3 1925). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
 |-  ( [ y  /  x ] x  e.  A  <->  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremclelsb4 2218* Substitution applied to an atomic wff (class version of elsb4 1926). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
 |-  ( [ y  /  x ] A  e.  x  <->  A  e.  y )
 
Theoremhbxfreq 2219 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1429 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
 |-  A  =  B   &    |-  (
 y  e.  B  ->  A. x  y  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremhblem 2220* Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
 |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )   =>    |-  ( z  e.  A  ->  A. x  z  e.  A )
 
Theoremabeq2 2221* Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2226 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable.

Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable  ph (that has a free variable  x) to a theorem with a class variable  A, we substitute  x  e.  A for  ph throughout and simplify, where  A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable  A to one with  ph, we substitute  { x  |  ph } for  A throughout and simplify, where  x and  ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

 |-  ( A  =  { x  |  ph }  <->  A. x ( x  e.  A  <->  ph ) )
 
Theoremabeq1 2222* Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( { x  |  ph
 }  =  A  <->  A. x ( ph  <->  x  e.  A ) )
 
Theoremabeq2i 2223 Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.)
 |-  A  =  { x  |  ph }   =>    |-  ( x  e.  A  <->  ph )
 
Theoremabeq1i 2224 Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.)
 |- 
 { x  |  ph }  =  A   =>    |-  ( ph  <->  x  e.  A )
 
Theoremabeq2d 2225 Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  { x  |  ps } )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( x  e.  A  <->  ps ) )
 
Theoremabbi 2226 Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  ( A. x (
 ph 
 <->  ps )  <->  { x  |  ph }  =  { x  |  ps } )
 
Theoremabbi2i 2227* Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( x  e.  A  <->  ph )   =>    |-  A  =  { x  |  ph }
 
Theoremabbii 2228 Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  <->  ps )   =>    |- 
 { x  |  ph }  =  { x  |  ps }
 
Theoremabbid 2229 Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  { x  |  ps }  =  { x  |  ch } )
 
Theoremabbidv 2230* Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps 
 <->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  { x  |  ps }  =  { x  |  ch } )
 
Theoremabbi2dv 2231* Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( x  e.  A  <->  ps ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  { x  |  ps } )
 
Theoremabbi1dv 2232* Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps 
 <->  x  e.  A ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  { x  |  ps }  =  A )
 
Theoremabid2 2233* A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
 |- 
 { x  |  x  e.  A }  =  A
 
Theoremsb8ab 2234 Substitution of variable in class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2018.)
 |- 
 F/ y ph   =>    |- 
 { x  |  ph }  =  { y  |  [ y  /  x ] ph }
 
Theoremcbvab 2235 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
 |- 
 F/ y ph   &    |-  F/ x ps   &    |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
 ph 
 <->  ps ) )   =>    |-  { x  |  ph
 }  =  { y  |  ps }
 
Theoremcbvabv 2236* Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
 |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  ( ph  <->  ps ) )   =>    |-  { x  |  ph
 }  =  { y  |  ps }
 
Theoremclelab 2237* Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
 |-  ( A  e.  { x  |  ph }  <->  E. x ( x  =  A  /\  ph )
 )
 
Theoremclabel 2238* Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
 |-  ( { x  |  ph
 }  e.  A  <->  E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  A. x ( x  e.  y  <->  ph ) ) )
 
Theoremsbab 2239* The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of  y for  x into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
 |-  ( x  =  y 
 ->  A  =  { z  |  [ y  /  x ] z  e.  A } )
 
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
 
Syntaxwnfc 2240 Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
 wff  F/_ x A
 
Theoremnfcjust 2241* Justification theorem for df-nfc 2242. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( A. y F/ x  y  e.  A  <->  A. z F/ x  z  e.  A )
 
Definitiondf-nfc 2242* Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read " x is not free in  A". Not-free means that the value of  x cannot affect the value of  A, e.g., any occurrence of  x in  A is effectively bound by a quantifier or something that expands to one (such as "there exists at most one"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1418 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  ( F/_ x A  <->  A. y F/ x  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremnfci 2243* Deduce that a class  A does not have  x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x  y  e.  A   =>    |-  F/_ x A
 
Theoremnfcii 2244* Deduce that a class  A does not have  x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )   =>    |-  F/_ x A
 
Theoremnfcr 2245* Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  F/ x  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremnfcrii 2246* Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |-  ( y  e.  A  ->  A. x  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremnfcri 2247* Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Note that unlike nfcr 2245, this does not require  y and  A to be disjoint.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |- 
 F/ x  y  e.  A
 
Theoremnfcd 2248* Deduce that a class  A does not have  x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ y ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x  y  e.  A )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )
 
Theoremnfceqi 2249 Equality theorem for class not-free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  A  =  B   =>    |-  ( F/_ x A 
 <-> 
 F/_ x B )
 
Theoremnfcxfr 2250 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  A  =  B   &    |-  F/_ x B   =>    |-  F/_ x A
 
Theoremnfcxfrd 2251 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  A  =  B   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )
 
Theoremnfceqdf 2252 An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  (
 F/_ x A  <->  F/_ x B ) )
 
Theoremnfcv 2253* If  x is disjoint from  A, then  x is not free in  A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A
 
Theoremnfcvd 2254* If  x is disjoint from  A, then  x is not free in  A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )
 
Theoremnfab1 2255 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x { x  |  ph
 }
 
Theoremnfnfc1 2256  x is bound in  F/_ x A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x F/_ x A
 
Theoremclelsb3f 2257 Substitution applied to an atomic wff (class version of elsb3 1925). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |-  ( [ y  /  x ] x  e.  A  <->  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremnfab 2258 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x ph   =>    |-  F/_ x { y  | 
 ph }
 
Theoremnfaba1 2259 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x { y  | 
 A. x ph }
 
Theoremnfnfc 2260 Hypothesis builder for  F/_ y A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |- 
 F/ x F/_ y A
 
Theoremnfeq 2261 Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   &    |-  F/_ x B   =>    |-  F/ x  A  =  B
 
Theoremnfel 2262 Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   &    |-  F/_ x B   =>    |-  F/ x  A  e.  B
 
Theoremnfeq1 2263* Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |- 
 F/ x  A  =  B
 
Theoremnfel1 2264* Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |- 
 F/ x  A  e.  B
 
Theoremnfeq2 2265* Hypothesis builder for equality, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x B   =>    |- 
 F/ x  A  =  B
 
Theoremnfel2 2266* Hypothesis builder for elementhood, special case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x B   =>    |- 
 F/ x  A  e.  B
 
Theoremnfcrd 2267* Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x  y  e.  A )
 
Theoremnfeqd 2268 Hypothesis builder for equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x  A  =  B )
 
Theoremnfeld 2269 Hypothesis builder for elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x  A  e.  B )
 
Theoremdrnfc1 2270 Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( A. x  x  =  y  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( A. x  x  =  y  ->  ( F/_ x A  <->  F/_ y B ) )
 
Theoremdrnfc2 2271 Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( A. x  x  =  y  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( A. x  x  =  y  ->  ( F/_ z A  <->  F/_ z B ) )
 
Theoremnfabd 2272 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ y ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x { y  |  ps } )
 
Theoremdvelimdc 2273 Deduction form of dvelimc 2274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |- 
 F/ x ph   &    |-  F/ z ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ x A )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  F/_ z B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( z  =  y  ->  A  =  B )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( -.  A. x  x  =  y  ->  F/_ x B ) )
 
Theoremdvelimc 2274 Version of dvelim 1966 for classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   &    |-  F/_ z B   &    |-  (
 z  =  y  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( -.  A. x  x  =  y  ->  F/_ x B )
 
Theoremnfcvf 2275 If  x and  y are distinct, then  x is not free in  y. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
 |-  ( -.  A. x  x  =  y  ->  F/_ x y )
 
Theoremnfcvf2 2276 If  x and  y are distinct, then  y is not free in  x. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
 |-  ( -.  A. x  x  =  y  ->  F/_ y x )
 
Theoremcleqf 2277 Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqh 2212. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   &    |-  F/_ x B   =>    |-  ( A  =  B 
 <-> 
 A. x ( x  e.  A  <->  x  e.  B ) )
 
Theoremabid2f 2278 A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |- 
 { x  |  x  e.  A }  =  A
 
Theoremsbabel 2279* Theorem to move a substitution in and out of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
 |-  F/_ x A   =>    |-  ( [ y  /  x ] { z  | 
 ph }  e.  A  <->  { z  |  [ y  /  x ] ph }  e.  A )
 
2.1.4  Negated equality and membership
 
2.1.4.1  Negated equality
 
Syntaxwne 2280 Extend wff notation to include inequality.
 wff  A  =/=  B
 
Definitiondf-ne 2281 Define inequality. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( A  =/=  B  <->  -.  A  =  B )
 
Theoremneii 2282 Inference associated with df-ne 2281. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
 |-  A  =/=  B   =>    |-  -.  A  =  B
 
Theoremneir 2283 Inference associated with df-ne 2281. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
 |- 
 -.  A  =  B   =>    |-  A  =/=  B
 
Theoremnner 2284 Negation of inequality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2018.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  -.  A  =/=  B )
 
Theoremnnedc 2285 Negation of inequality where equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2018.)
 |-  (DECID  A  =  B  ->  ( -.  A  =/=  B  <->  A  =  B ) )
 
Theoremdcned 2286 Decidable equality implies decidable negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2020.)
 |-  ( ph  -> DECID  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  -> DECID  A  =/=  B )
 
Theoremneqned 2287 If it is not the case that two classes are equal, they are unequal. Converse of neneqd 2301. One-way deduction form of df-ne 2281. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) Allow a shortening of necon3bi 2330. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 22-Nov-2019.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  -.  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A  =/=  B )
 
Theoremneqne 2288 From non-equality to inequality. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
 |-  ( -.  A  =  B  ->  A  =/=  B )
 
Theoremneirr 2289 No class is unequal to itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2018.)
 |- 
 -.  A  =/=  A
 
Theoremeqneqall 2290 A contradiction concerning equality implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  ( A  =/=  B  -> 
 ph ) )
 
Theoremdcne 2291 Decidable equality expressed in terms of  =/=. Basically the same as df-dc 803. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2020.)
 |-  (DECID  A  =  B  <->  ( A  =  B  \/  A  =/=  B ) )
 
Theoremnonconne 2292 Law of noncontradiction with equality and inequality. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.)
 |- 
 -.  ( A  =  B  /\  A  =/=  B )
 
Theoremneeq1 2293 Equality theorem for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  ( A  =/=  C  <->  B  =/=  C ) )
 
Theoremneeq2 2294 Equality theorem for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
 |-  ( A  =  B  ->  ( C  =/=  A  <->  C  =/=  B ) )
 
Theoremneeq1i 2295 Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.)
 |-  A  =  B   =>    |-  ( A  =/=  C  <->  B  =/=  C )
 
Theoremneeq2i 2296 Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.)
 |-  A  =  B   =>    |-  ( C  =/=  A  <->  C  =/=  B )
 
Theoremneeq12i 2297 Inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
 |-  A  =  B   &    |-  C  =  D   =>    |-  ( A  =/=  C  <->  B  =/=  D )
 
Theoremneeq1d 2298 Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A  =/=  C  <->  B  =/=  C ) )
 
Theoremneeq2d 2299 Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( C  =/=  A  <->  C  =/=  B ) )
 
Theoremneeq12d 2300 Deduction for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  A  =  B )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  C  =  D )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( A  =/=  C  <->  B  =/=  D ) )
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11600 117 11601-11700 118 11701-11800 119 11801-11900 120 11901-12000 121 12001-12100 122 12101-12200 123 12201-12300 124 12301-12400 125 12401-12500 126 12501-12600 127 12601-12700 128 12701-12800 129 12801-12900 130 12901-12930
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >