P. 23 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2201-2300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqtr4d 2201	An equality transitivity equality deduction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	3eqtrd 2202	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = D )
Theorem	3eqtrrd 2203	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = A )
Theorem	3eqtr2d 2204	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = D )
Theorem	3eqtr2rd 2205	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = A )
Theorem	3eqtr3d 2206	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	3eqtr3rd 2207	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = C )
Theorem	3eqtr4d 2208	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	3eqtr4rd 2209	A deduction from three chained equalities. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = C )
Theorem	syl5eq 2210	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	eqtr2id 2211	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> C = A )
Theorem	eqtr3id 2212	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- B = A   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	eqtr3di 2213	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- A = C   =>    |- ( ph -> B = C )
Theorem	eqtrdi 2214	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- B = C   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	eqtr2di 2215	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- B = C   =>    |- ( ph -> C = A )
Theorem	eqtr4di 2216	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	eqtr4id 2217	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = C )
Theorem	sylan9eq 2218	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ps -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A = C )
Theorem	sylan9req 2219	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ph -> B = A )   &    |- ( ps -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A = C )
Theorem	sylan9eqr 2220	An equality transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ps -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ ph ) -> A = C )
Theorem	3eqtr3g 2221	A chained equality inference, useful for converting from definitions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	3eqtr3a 2222	A chained equality inference, useful for converting from definitions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2015.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	3eqtr4g 2223	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	3eqtr4a 2224	A chained equality inference, useful for converting to definitions. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> C = D )
Theorem	eq2tri 2225	A compound transitive inference for class equality. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- ( A = C -> D = F )   &    |- ( B = D -> C = G )   =>    |- ( ( A = C /\ B = F ) <-> ( B = D /\ A = G ) )
Theorem	eleq1w 2226	Weaker version of eleq1 2228 (but more general than elequ1 2140) not depending on ax-ext 2147 nor df-cleq 2158. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.)
|- ( x = y -> ( x e. A <-> y e. A ) )
Theorem	eleq2w 2227	Weaker version of eleq2 2229 (but more general than elequ2 2141) not depending on ax-ext 2147 nor df-cleq 2158. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
|- ( x = y -> ( A e. x <-> A e. y ) )
Theorem	eleq1 2228	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A e. C <-> B e. C ) )
Theorem	eleq2 2229	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C e. A <-> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eleq12 2230	Equality implies equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
|- ( ( A = B /\ C = D ) -> ( A e. C <-> B e. D ) )
Theorem	eleq1i 2231	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A e. C <-> B e. C )
Theorem	eleq2i 2232	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C e. A <-> C e. B )
Theorem	eleq12i 2233	Inference from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A e. C <-> B e. D )
Theorem	eleq1d 2234	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. C ) )
Theorem	eleq2d 2235	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C e. A <-> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eleq12d 2236	Deduction from equality to equivalence of membership. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. C <-> B e. D ) )
Theorem	eleq1a 2237	A transitive-type law relating membership and equality. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A e. B -> ( C = A -> C e. B ) )
Theorem	eqeltri 2238	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrri 2239	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A = B   &    |- A e. C   =>    |- B e. C
Theorem	eleqtri 2240	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- B = C   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eleqtrri 2241	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = B   =>    |- A e. C
Theorem	eqeltrd 2242	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation, deduction form. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrd 2243	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> B e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrd 2244	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrd 2245	Deduction that substitutes equal classes into membership. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	3eltr3i 2246	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr4i 2247	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- A e. B   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- C e. D
Theorem	3eltr3d 2248	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = C )   &    |- ( ph -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4d 2249	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = A )   &    |- ( ph -> D = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr3g 2250	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- A = C   &    |- B = D   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	3eltr4g 2251	Substitution of equal classes into membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = A   &    |- D = B   =>    |- ( ph -> C e. D )
Theorem	eqeltrid 2252	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrid 2253	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- B = A   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrid 2254	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrid 2255	B membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- A e. B   &    |- ( ph -> C = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrdi 2256	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eqeltrrdi 2257	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> B = A )   &    |- B e. C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrdi 2258	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- B = C   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleqtrrdi 2259	A membership and equality inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. C )
Theorem	eleq2s 2260	Substitution of equal classes into a membership antecedent. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> ph )   &    |- C = B   =>    |- ( A e. C -> ph )
Theorem	eqneltrd 2261	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )
Theorem	eqneltrrd 2262	If a class is not an element of another class, an equal class is also not an element. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> -. A e. C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B e. C )
Theorem	neleqtrd 2263	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. B )
Theorem	neleqtrrd 2264	If a class is not an element of another class, it is also not an element of an equal class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> -. C e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. C e. A )
Theorem	cleqh 2265*	Establish equality between classes, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. See also cleqf 2332. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( A = B <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> x e. B ) )
Theorem	nelneq 2266	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1997.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ -. B e. C ) -> -. A = B )
Theorem	nelneq2 2267	A way of showing two classes are not equal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ -. A e. C ) -> -. B = C )
Theorem	eqsb1lem 2268*	Lemma for eqsb1 2269. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	eqsb1 2269*	Substitution for the left-hand side in an equality. Class version of equsb3 1939. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x = A <-> y = A )
Theorem	clelsb1 2270*	Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2143). (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ y / x ] x e. A <-> y e. A )
Theorem	clelsb2 2271*	Substitution for the second argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb2 2144). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A e. x <-> A e. y )
Theorem	hbxfreq 2272	A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfrbi 1460 for equivalence version. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2007.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( y e. B -> A. x y e. B )   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )
Theorem	hblem 2273*	Change the free variable of a hypothesis builder. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- ( z e. A -> A. x z e. A )
Theorem	abeq2 2274*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a class builder). Theorem 5.1 of [Quine] p. 34. This theorem shows the relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions with class variables. Note that abbi 2279 and its relatives are among those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction for each class variable. Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph (that has a free variable x) to a theorem with a class variable A, we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify, where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. Conversely, to convert a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph, we substitute { x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph are new set and wff variables not already in the wff. For more information on class variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = { x | ph } <-> A. x ( x e. A <-> ph ) )
Theorem	abeq1 2275*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
|- ( { x | ph } = A <-> A. x ( ph <-> x e. A ) )
Theorem	abeq2i 2276	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.)
|- A = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ph )
Theorem	abeq1i 2277	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1994.)
|- { x | ph } = A   =>    |- ( ph <-> x e. A )
Theorem	abeq2d 2278	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )
Theorem	abbi 2279	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) <-> { x | ph } = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi2i 2280*	Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x e. A <-> ph )   =>    |- A = { x | ph }
Theorem	abbii 2281	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { x | ps }
Theorem	abbid 2282	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbidv 2283*	Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = { x | ch } )
Theorem	abbi2dv 2284*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = { x | ps } )
Theorem	abbi1dv 2285*	Deduction from a wff to a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> x e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x | ps } = A )
Theorem	abid2 2286*	A simplification of class abstraction. Theorem 5.2 of [Quine] p. 35. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- { x | x e. A } = A
Theorem	sb8ab 2287	Substitution of variable in class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | [ y / x ] ph }
Theorem	cbvabw 2288*	Version of cbvab 2289 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvab 2289	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	cbvabv 2290*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
Theorem	clelab 2291*	Membership of a class variable in a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	clabel 2292*	Membership of a class abstraction in another class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. A <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ A. x ( x e. y <-> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbab 2293*	The right-hand side of the second equality is a way of representing proper substitution of y for x into a class variable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- ( x = y -> A = { z | [ y / x ] z e. A } )
2.1.3  Class form not-free predicate
Syntax	wnfc 2294	Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate for classes.
wff F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcjust 2295*	Justification theorem for df-nfc 2296. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. y F/ x y e. A <-> A. z F/ x z e. A )
Definition	df-nfc 2296*	Define the not-free predicate for classes. This is read " x is not free in A". Not-free means that the value of x cannot affect the value of A, e.g., any occurrence of x in A is effectively bound by a quantifier or something that expands to one (such as "there exists at most one"). It is defined in terms of the not-free predicate df-nf 1449 for wffs; see that definition for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A <-> A. y F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfci 2297*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x y e. A   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcii 2298*	Deduce that a class A does not have x free in it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )   =>    |- F/_ x A
Theorem	nfcr 2299*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x y e. A )
Theorem	nfcrii 2300*	Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( y e. A -> A. x y e. A )