ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfopd Unicode version

Theorem nfopd 3775
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 3774. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 3774 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2008.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfopd.2  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfopd.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfopd  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x <. A ,  B >. )

Proof of Theorem nfopd
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfaba1 2314 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }
2 nfaba1 2314 . . 3  |-  F/_ x { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }
31, 2nfop 3774 . 2  |-  F/_ x <. { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } ,  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } >.
4 nfopd.2 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
5 nfopd.3 . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x B )
6 nfnfc1 2311 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x A
7 nfnfc1 2311 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x F/_ x B
86, 7nfan 1553 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )
9 abidnf 2894 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x A  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }  =  A )
109adantr 274 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A }  =  A )
11 abidnf 2894 . . . . . 6  |-  ( F/_ x B  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }  =  B )
1211adantl 275 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  ->  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B }  =  B )
1310, 12opeq12d 3766 . . . 4  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  ->  <. { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } ,  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } >.  =  <. A ,  B >. )
148, 13nfceqdf 2307 . . 3  |-  ( (
F/_ x A  /\  F/_ x B )  -> 
( F/_ x <. { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } ,  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } >. 
<-> 
F/_ x <. A ,  B >. ) )
154, 5, 14syl2anc 409 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  ( F/_ x <. { z  |  A. x  z  e.  A } ,  { z  |  A. x  z  e.  B } >. 
<-> 
F/_ x <. A ,  B >. ) )
163, 15mpbii 147 1  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x <. A ,  B >. )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 103    <-> wb 104   A.wal 1341    = wceq 1343    e. wcel 2136   {cab 2151   F/_wnfc 2295   <.cop 3579
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728  df-un 3120  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585
This theorem is referenced by:  nfbrd  4027  nfovd  5871
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator